Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans 11.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 4]

On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 10:08 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > The LICENSE file has a table that maps a file to its license "key" and > the > > license is then stored in the (top-level) "licenses" directory (in the > > header of the table, there is a note about that: "text is in file in > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans 11.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 4]

Hi Justin, Some more questions on the LICENSE(/NOTICE). On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:43 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > I think there some more work to do on licensing here, and these will be > needed to be fixed in a later release: > - You are not compiling with the terms of the licenses of the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans 11.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 4]

Hi Justin, On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 7:58 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > > I assume we are taking about files like: > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/blob/master/java/java.hints/test/unit/data/org/netbeans/test/java/hints/AddCast1.java > > Those are some of the files yes but

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans 11.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 4]

Hi Justin, Thanks for the comments. One particular question/comment at this time: On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 2:43 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > - There are a number (100’s) of source files that do not have ASF headers, > Please run rat and please add headers to .java, .jsp and .php files that > are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I wonder where exactly (most) of these files come from. > > Sorry, many apologies, and my mistake as I looked at your last release by > accident. Changing my vote to +0 (binding). > > I can still see the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

Hi Justin, I wonder where exactly (most) of these files come from. I just did: $ wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans-java/incubating-9.0-rc1-rc1/incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-rc1-source.zip [this is the URL from the first e-mail in this thread] $

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:44 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > > > On 2018-05-23 20:57, Emilian Bold wrote: > >> Ate, could we get a vote on this release? >> > > Sure :-) > > >> If you look at https://cwiki.apache.org/confl >> uence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+RC1 we are already

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:20 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Quote from Apache Legal FAQ: > > https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#prohibited > > > > "[...] For example, using a GPL'ed tool during the build is OK, however > > including GPL'ed source code is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: [snip] > Apache Felix is using those as well, I think? > > They may well do but TLP don’t always get things 100% right (the lucerne > NOTICE file for instance) so IMO we should try and work what is the right > hing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I guess I originally misunderstood the requirements here - I though that > > these only need to be in the top-level of a release (we are not releasing > > the jars separatelly). Should be fairly easy to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

Thanks a lot for a thorough review! Will take some time to go through that and fix, but a few questions: On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I did this fairly quickly so may of made a mistake or two and may of > missed something. A number of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > One of the issue raised as the NOTICE file in the binary distribution. As > > far as I can tell, it is unclear what specifically we should do about it. > > (Yes, it contains a lot of text, but my

Re: License headers on test data (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2)

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 1:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > > > > > > - Specific call outs in the README about test data licensing not be > > Apache > > > license > > > > > > > This is one of the things that are very unclear to me. If we are talking > > about files like

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote: > > > Am 22.01.2018 um 11:01 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > >> I am not sure what the point is of spending time on putting rat exclusions >> together if they’re simply going to be ignored when it comes to IPMC >> members

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:36 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 5:33 AM Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > The very last thing you’ll find us doing is ignoring your advice. We have > > taken everything everyone has said

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 12:39 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > In many/most cases, the issues picked up by Justin are issues that are > not > > visible if our rat exclusions are taken into account. Now, of course, > what > > we can do is discuss those rat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 2:14 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Could please the FAQ be updated with exact requirements (or the point > > removed), to avoid further confusion? > > It [1] seems clear to me i.e. there’s an exception for test data but not > test code. > Yes.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Hi Justing, > > It’s Justin actually. > Opops, sorry. > > > Regarding the Java files and .pass files: as NetBeans is (among other > > things) a Java IDE, it has tests that take a Java file (often very

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

Hi Justing, Thanks for the comments. I guess it will take some time for us to fully go through the list and resolve it. I have a few comments/questions inline if I may. On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > It -1 (binding) as there may be GPL

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

Hello, On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > git clone of the Linus' repo takes 3 minutes. > > The hg clone of netbeans took 5 HOURS! > > Also checking out all the files or swapping branches in the git repo takes > about 45 seconds in GIT, but much