Re: [VOTE] Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator

2016-09-20 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
* Nfdump: BSD > * Wireshark: GNU General Public License version 2 > * Apache Hadoop: Apache License 2.0 > * Apache Spark: Apache License 2.0 > * JQuery: MIT > * ReactJS: BSD > * Bootstrap: MIT > > Issues related to GPL dependencies will be resolved during incubation. >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-02 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
Xiang Zhong > > * Tianlun Zhang > > * Qian Xu > > * Huafeng Wang > > * Kam Kasravi > > * Weihua Jiang > > * Tomasz Targonski > > * Karol Brejna > > * Gang Wang > > * Mark Chmarny > > * Xinglang Wang > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sentry

2016-02-25 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
t of the projects within the scope of >> responsibility of the Apache Sentry Project; and be it further >> >> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> Apache Sentry Project:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sentry from the Incubator

2016-02-17 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
+1 Binding. Jarcec > On Feb 16, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote: > > Justin, > > Yes, for the release 1.5.0 - voting was restarted on the general > list[1]. We later on did releases 1.5.1 (to fix some issues in 1.5.0) > and 1.6.0. > > [1]: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_m

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

2015-11-25 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
[X] +1, accept Impala into the Incubator (Binding) Jarcec > On Nov 24, 2015, at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > > Hi - > > The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been > sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring Impala > to the ASF Incu

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

2015-11-24 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
t; == Required Resources == > > === Mailing lists === > > * priv...@kudu.incubator.apache.org (PMC) > * comm...@kudu.incubator.apache.org (git push emails) > * iss...@kudu.incubator.apache.org (JIRA issue feed) > * d...@kudu.incubator.apache.org (Gerrit code reviews plus dev dis

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry incubating version 1.6.0 (rc0)

2015-09-16 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
+1 * Signature and checksums fits * Verified top level files (LICENSE, DISCLAMER, …) * Project compiles * Apache Rat is happy with licenses Jarcec > On Sep 15, 2015, at 11:27 PM, Sun, Dapeng wrote: > > Hi IPMC, > > > > This is the incubator release of Apache Sentry, version 1.6.0-incubating

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry incubating version 1.5.1 (rc0)

2015-07-13 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
+1 binding * Signature and checksums are correct * Name correctly contains “-incubating” suffix * Verified top level files (LICENSE, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE) * I was not able to compile the archive with maven 3.0.5, I was getting dependency issues with some pentaho library. The issue goes away with ne

Re: [VOTE] Accept Parquet into the incubator

2014-05-18 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> [ X ] +1 Accept Parquet into the Incubator (non-binding) Jarcec On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 02:15:15PM -0700, Chris Aniszczyk wrote: > Based on the results of the discussion thread: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201405.mbox/%3CCAJg1wMRGhLu4P7LeVQB%2B5K0C-fr-pw2448uj%

Re: Change of IPMC Chair

2014-02-03 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
Congratulations Roman! Jarcec On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 06:11:42PM -0800, Henry Saputra wrote: > Congrats Roman! > > On Monday, February 3, 2014, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > Congratulations to Roman Shaposhnik! The Incubator PMC has voted to > > recommend > > Roman as our ne

Re: [VOTE] Accept DataFu into the Incubator

2013-12-31 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
pache 2.0) > > Cryptography > > DataFu has user-defined functions that use MD5 and SHA provided by Java’s > java.security.MessageDigest. > > Required Resources > > Mailing Lists > > DataFu-private for private PMC discussions (with moderated subscriptions) > DataFu-

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivory - Hadoop data management and processing platform

2013-03-13 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
Hi Srikanth, I've read the proposal and documentation available on Github and the project seems very interesting to me. I'm currently mainly focusing on Apache Sqoop [1] and I can see a lot of opportunities for integration. I'll be more than happy to help with Ivory going forward. In case that y

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

2012-11-01 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
I'm sorry, I probably miss understood the intention here. Jarcec On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 11:21:22PM +0100, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: > > > As was written - the repository was moved in direction SVN -> GIT using &

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

2012-11-01 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal > > > > > >Cool. > > > > > >Personally I have not the competence to do anything with git except using > > >it (referencing to Craigs mail). > > >Now... how did you do the history transition from svn to

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

2012-11-01 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
I've been participating in three different projects that were moving from SVN to git (flume, sqoop, mrunit) and we did not experienced any issues with that process. Jarcec On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 12:09:43PM -0700, Craig L Russell wrote: > > On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrot

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Roman Shaposhnik to the Apache Incubator PMC

2012-10-19 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
Wow, congratulations Roman! Jarcec On Oct 19, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Welcome! > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > wrote: >> Hey Folks, >> >> The Apache Incubator PMC has VOTEd to add Roman Shaposhnik to our ranks. >> >> Welcome, Roman! Fe

Re: ${podling}.incubator.apache.org

2012-10-12 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
I also like the idea of moving podling name to domain name. However I'm pretty indifferent between $podling.incubator.a.o and $podling.a.o, so I'm +1 on both (just contributor opinion). Jarcec On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 07:24:10AM -0700, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Friday, October 12, 2012, Jukka

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator

2012-06-05 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> [ X ] +1 Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator Jarcec On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:17:57AM -0700, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > This is a call for vote to graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator. > > Flume entered the Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added nine > new committe

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

2012-02-28 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
Hi Alex and Alan, we already moved entire logic to org.apache namespace. We're keeping classes in com.cloudera in place only for compatibility with tools that are based on sqoop (for example various connectors). However those classes do not contain any logic, they are just inheriting from org.ap

'' Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

2012-02-24 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
[ X ] +1 Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator (Non-binding) Jarcec On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:34:09PM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > This is a call for vote to graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator. > > Sqoop entered Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added three > new

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop from Apache

2012-02-19 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
+1. Jarcec On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 09:22:01AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > The Apache Sqoop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we > have added three new committers from diverse organizations and added two > new PPMC members. The codebase of our product has steadily grown an

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop from Apache Incubator

2012-02-19 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
+1 Jarcec On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 01:00:57AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > The Apache Sqoop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we > have added three new committers from diverse organizations and added two > new PPMC members. The codebase of our product has steadily grown and

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-14 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
haposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho > wrote: > > Hi Roman, > > we're definitely open to embrace any Apache policy for naming files. Can > > you point me to some written docs? > > AFAIK, it would be fair to say that

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-14 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
eb 14, 2012 at 02:27:35PM -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho > wrote: > > The vote now passes with 3 +1 binding votes (including 1 from dev list > > vote): > > Tom White > > Patrick Hunt > > Olivier Lamy (de

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-14 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
with the release process. Jarcec On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:33:03PM +0100, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: > I'm closing this vote. I'll sent results shortly. Thanks to everyone who > participated! > > Jarcec > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 06:38:16PM +0100, Jarek Jarcec

Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-14 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
I'm closing this vote. I'll sent results shortly. Thanks to everyone who participated! Jarcec On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 06:38:16PM +0100, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: > This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version > 1.4.1-incubating. > > We already have one

Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-13 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
Thank you for your feedback sir. If it's not an blocker, we will fix that in next release. Jarcec On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:41:00AM +, sebb wrote: > On 10 February 2012 19:27, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: > > This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, vers

[VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-13 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version 1.4.1-incubating. We already have one IPMC vote on dev list (Oliver Lamy) and we're looking for additional two. I'm resending this email again without original "RE:" prefix in subject to stress that this is new vote. Thanks, Jarcec

Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-12 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version 1.4.1-incubating. We already have one IPMC vote on dev list (Oliver Lamy) and we're looking for additional two. *** Please cast your vote by 2012-02-14 *** Dev list vote thread: http://markmail.org/message/alpqeqwliq4xbbcc The list

[VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-10 Thread Jarek Jarcec Cecho
This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version 1.4.1-incubating. We already have one IPMC vote on dev list (Oliver Lamy) and we're looking for additional two. *** Please cast your vote by 2012-02-14 *** Dev list vote thread: http://markmail.org/message/alpqeqwliq4xbbcc The list