[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
On 06/10/2011 06:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject
On 02/04/2011 10:52 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Note the wording: should.
Sometimes 72 hours is just too long, especially
for security related releases. In that (or any other
special) case RM can call for a shorter, or even
longer window.
Regards
[X] +1 to recommend Traffic Server's graduation
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 03/16/2010 12:22 AM, Nóirín Shirley for the ApacheCon 2010 Planning Team
wrote:
Dear PMC,
ApacheCon 2010 North America is just around the corner, and it's time
to roll out a program for this event! We'll be at the Westin Peachtree
Plaza in Atlanta, GA, from 1st-5th November. Will you be
On 03/05/2010 08:21 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache
trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha:
[X] +1 Publish
[ ] 0 Abstain
[ ] -1 Don't publish, because...
If not too late you have my +1
Regards
--
^TM
On 03/10/2010 05:10 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache
trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha:
[X] +1 Publish
[ ] 0 Abstain
[ ] -1 Don't publish, because...
Regards
--
^TM
-
To
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Since our first draft, we've added a number of mentors and contributors,
and also added and improved on the proposal. I would like this to be
considered our official application, and that the Incubator votes (+ or
-) on our acceptance as a podling.
+1
Regards
--
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 30, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
I'll be interested in this.
Would it be useful for me to don an ASF hat and offer to
help mentoring this? I'll also (naturally) be looking from
httpd/proxy eyes.
Don't we already have 3 Mentor? Any more would be
Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1 (binding) on the singular change of dropping Mladen Turk and Nick Kew
as Mentors since that makes it 5 mentors, which is problematic (3 seems
to be the max).
Otherwise -1 (binding)
This is total nonsense.
You would -1 the project just because me and Nick expressed
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Add me.
Sweet, thanks! I have updated the draft proposal with the three mentors
that we have so far. How many do we need before we could be considered
for a vote?
I'd like to join as well.
We were looking for a mod_jk successor for a long time,
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 2, 2006, at 12:51 PM, Mark Little wrote:
That kind of depends what you're used to now doesn't it? In some
circles really getting involved actively can best be done (can only be
done) with committer rights.
That's not how the ASF works or has ever worked.
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
So far we have 8 binding votes and I was wondering what the official
time period was for the voting window? Is it 72 hours as it is for
everything else? Just want to move on to the next phase of the process
if that is permissible at this point. Here are the votes
Jason van Zyl wrote:
So you wouldn't mind of mine humble non binding -1
vote. Like said, I don't have nothing against
that project, but like in many things in life
even the ASF seems to behave in the spirit of:
Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.
That's very sad :(
I don't think it's that hard
Jim Jagielski wrote:
MINA is expected to propose a move to TLP soon... MINA
started off as a framework for ApacheDS and has grown into
its own very cool codebase.
I'd like to help here as well.
If that happens, I'm willing to help as well.
Although I'm not a huge fun of NIO in Servlet
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 13:52 -0400, Sakala, Adinarayana wrote:
== Initial Committers ==
...
* Hani Suileman
Wow. Interesting. Never imagined Hani'd come our way. See for example
his latest masterpiece from
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 6/21/06, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That kind of person, has nothing in common
with anything ASF stands for thought.
ASF membership is distinct from committership. If Hani evidences
merit for a particular project as judged by his peers on the project
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
And people in general shouldn't be discussed on this list.
Sorry about that. My bad :(.
Regards,
Mladen.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
Anyway, I think it is important that we judge a person by what he does
rather than by what we think we know about him (and a satiric blog is
probably not a good source).
You are completely wrong with that.
There can be no healthy community without at least
minimal mutual
18 matches
Mail list logo
