Incubator-SVN-Clutch-Analysis-part-1 build job

FYI, I just cancelled the following Incubator-SVN-Clutch-Analysis-part-1 build run: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Incubator/job/Incubator-SVN-Clutch-Analysis-part-1/1599/ It had been running for 2 days and 10 hours, where normally it should take only a couple of minutes. Not sure why it got

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Celix - Websocket pubsub admin

Thanks for your input as well Matt! Next time we'll discuss upfront whether IP clearance is necessary or not. Consider this case as a "better safe than sorry" one. With that said, 72 hours have passed so the vote is closed with the following results: +1: Furkan Kamaci Matt Sicker Roy

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Celix - Websocket pubsub admin

> Given it was already had a ASF license header and from a ASF project why was IP clearance even needed? I assume the person involved has signed a ICLA? The individual contributors all submitted an ICLA and a CCLA for the company is already present. We were following IP clearance because the

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Celix - Websocket pubsub admin

> Thales has been sending SGAs for all their Celix PRs lately. Thales indeed sent 3 SGAs already. 1 definitely required: a complete new component (HTTP admin). This websocket pubsub admin and a tcp pubsub admin. All those were approached the same. -- Roy

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Celix - Websocket pubsub admin

The donation was developed by duplicating an existing Celix component (pubsub_admin_zmq)[1] to a new component (pubsub_admin_websocket)[2]. Then the contents of the files has been changed to use websockets instead of ZeroMQ. All this time the ASF header was kept in place. [1]

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Celix - Websocket pubsub admin

Hi Justin, Thanks for reviewing. Isn't this actually part of the IP clearance form which describes the following: > Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have been updated to reflect the new ASF copyright. Having a look at other IP clearances they are more or less doing the

[IP CLEARANCE] Apache Celix - Websocket pubsub admin

Hi all, Apache Celix received a donation which adds an additional pubsub admin to Celix. This pubsub admin uses websockets as communication technique and can be used next to the existing ZeroMQ, TCP or UDP multicast pubsub admins. No new third party dependencies are added. The IP clearance form

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Celix - TCP pubsub admin

With no -1 votes being cast, this IP clearance vote passes by lazy consensus. I'll update the IP clearance form [1] to include the result. Roy [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/celix-pubsub-admin-tcp.html Op wo 24 jul. 2019 om 18:07 schreef Roy Lenferink : > Hi all, > > Apa

[IP CLEARANCE] Apache Celix - TCP pubsub admin

Hi all, Apache Celix received a donation which adds an additional pubsub admin to Celix. This pubsub admin uses TCP as communication technique and can be used next to the existing ZeroMQ or UDP multicast pubsub admins. No third party dependencies are added. The IP clearance form can be found at:

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Celix - HTTP admin

With no -1 votes being cast, this IP clearance vote passes by lazy consensus. I'll update the IP clearance form [1] to include the result. Roy [1] https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/celix-http-admin.html On 2019/07/12 08:57:00, Roy Lenferink wrote: > Hi all, > > Apache Celix

[IP CLEARANCE] Apache Celix - HTTP admin

Hi all, Apache Celix received a donation which adds an HTTP admin service to Celix. This HTTP admin service can be used to serve a set of specified resources over an HTTP endpoint. The HTTP admin supports the use of websockets as well. The IP clearance form can be found at:

Re: [DISCUSS] Mandatory relocation of Apache git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

/Incubator%20Site/ Op di 11 dec. 2018 om 17:43 schreef Roy Lenferink : > Perfect. I have created an issue with INFRA for this and will post a > message to the list once the repo has been migrated. > > In the meantime I tried to update the Jenkins job responsible for > generating the In

Re: [DISCUSS] Mandatory relocation of Apache git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

Perfect. I have created an issue with INFRA for this and will post a message to the list once the repo has been migrated. In the meantime I tried to update the Jenkins job responsible for generating the Incubator website, but I noticed I haven't got enough permisssions to do so. Can a PMC chair

[DISCUSS] Mandatory relocation of Apache git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

Hi all, The Apache Incubator is still having a repository on git-wip-us as well [1]. Does anyone have a problem with moving over the incubator repository to gitbox voluntarily? This means integrated access and easy PRs (write access to the GitHub repo). We need to document support for the

Re: Request to join the IPMC

Hi Chris, Since you're already a Foundation member you can express your interest by sending an e-mail to private@incubator.a.o. [1] As a foundation member you can subscribe to private@incubator.a.o as well. [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/pmc.html#joining_the_ipmc Regards, Roy Op di 28

Re: [VOTE] Heron to enter Apache Incubator

+1 Op vr 16 jun. 2017 om 22:49 schreef Julien Le Dem > +1 > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 1:46 PM, William Markito Oliveira < > mark...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 >