Re: [VOTE] Accept PLC4X into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding -- I just saw this project: very cool! I'm going to check it out. On Dec 14, 2017 3:19 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to start a VOTE to propose the PLC4X project as a podling > into the Apache incubator. > > The ASF voting rules are

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Mynewt podling

Hi, On 7 Jun 2017, at 1:52, aditi hilbert wrote: Hello IPMC, We have had the discussion thread for the graduation of Apache Mynewt podling to TLP open for >72 hours. All the issues raised there have been addressed. I propose that we graduate Apache Mynewt from the incubator. The full text

Re: Slack support?

+1 > On Mar 22, 2017, at 5:43 PM, James Bognar wrote: > > There's interest from me personally. Slack appears to be becoming > popular. HipChat appears to be slowing down in interest. > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:40 PM, John D. Ament >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-incubating-rc1

Hi All - I know there is a lot going on, but I’m hoping for some help getting this release out! Thanks, Sterling On 14 Mar 2017, at 14:17, Sterling Hughes wrote: +1 binding On 12 Mar 2017, at 21:09, marko kiiskila wrote: The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-incubating-rc1

+1 binding On 12 Mar 2017, at 21:09, marko kiiskila wrote: The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-incubating-rc1. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Apache Mynewt is a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-b2-incubating-rc1

The commits under consideration are as follows: blinky: repos: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mynewt-blinky commit a69b409197a845bc75748af564cb08c4ec7701d4 core: repos: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mynewt-core commit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-b1-incubating-rc1

Thanks Justin. I’ll let Chris chime in on the rest of the notices (or just fix them), but I wanted to specifically clarify [5] referenced below. This license is not considered Category X either — do you know what the status of 4-clause BSD is? Its low risk to remove that file, and we can

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 1.0.0-b1-incubating-rc1

+1 Binding. Compiled and ran regression test suites, tested in on both Nordic and Atmel hardware. Sterling On 26 Nov 2016, at 17:18, Christopher Collins wrote: Hello all, I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache Mynewt 1.0.0, beta 1. Apache Mynewt is a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.9.0-incubating-rc3

+1 > On Jun 5, 2016, at 6:52 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > +1 looks good to me now. > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:19 PM Christopher Collins > wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.9.0-incubating-rc1

Hey John, I think the VOTE should be recalled based upon looking at newt. I’ll admit — all my testing was on the git tags for the release, and not the tarballs themselves. As a FYI, what happened is that only the newt directory got released in newt tarball instead of the TLD:

Re: Number of projects in Incubation [was: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.9.0-incubating-rc1]

I just want to clarify here on the thread —- while I think in general there may be problems with too many podlings/inactive mentors, that is not an issue we often face. It is simply that this release came at a time when some of our mentors were busy, and we want to get a release out the door—

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.9.0-incubating-rc1

Hi, It’s been 5 days since the start of the vote thread — we’re waiting on 2 more votes +1 — already passed podling PMC. Can folks jump in? Thanks, Sterling On 25 May 2016, at 7:58, Sterling Hughes wrote: Hi All, Trying to get this out, we have one +1 binding vote on general@ (from me

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.9.0-incubating-rc1

Hi All, Trying to get this out, we have one +1 binding vote on general@ (from me), and need _2_ more votes. The release has passed the podling PMC unanimously -- please help us get this out, as we're approaching the end of the vote window (we may be past it.) This is the 4th release we're

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.9.0-incubating-rc1

+1 binding carries over mynewt dev list Ship it! > On May 22, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Christopher Collins wrote: > > Hello, > > The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release > Apache Mynewt 0.9.0-incubating. We now kindly request that the Incubator >

Re: GitHub vs. the mailing lists

Hi Mike, On 5/18/16 11:51 AM, Mike Jumper wrote: Hello all, Does anyone here have any experience with using GitHub pull requests in a code review workflow which leverages a podling's mailing lists? Since things have only happened if on the mailing lists, it'd be nice if PR activity could

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-incubating

+1 binding carrying over from dev list > On May 2, 2016, at 3:30 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > +1 (binding) carried over from dev list - all usual checks done. > > Thanks, > Justin > > - >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b2-incubating-rc3

+1 binding. Personally tested release on Arduino Zero and Simulated environments. Have seen it working on NRF51, NRF52 environments. Sterling On 3/22/16 2:50 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, +1 binding Carried over from the dev list. Did all of my usual checks. Note if you’re compiling on OS X

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mynewt 0.8.0-b1-incubating

+1 binding As Justin mentions this is a bit rough, but it is a v0.8-b1 release, and it's been very good for the podling to go through the process of a full release. Sterling On 2/26/16 7:01 PM, Christopher Collins wrote: Hello, The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to

Re: Release dependant on LGPL

On 2/19/16 6:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Greg Stein wrote: ...Speaking as an IPMC Member, and a Mynewt Mentor … yes, this is fine with a disclaimer in the release notes Except we don't have a standard for release notes, so how

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

me basic statistics from our >>>> current Github >>>> >>>> [...] (tables omitted as they don't render well; see online version [1] >>>> for details) >>>> >>>> This is the ex

Re: [VOTE] Accept Milagro into the Incubator

the proposers to seek incubation at Apache is the coming of >>> new corporate interest: while both corporate teams have open-source >>> experience, their cultures and backgrounds differ. >>> >>> We hope that incubation at Apache may help the teams c

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tempo - A proposal for an enterprise IoT platform

I'd like to also offer to mentor, if you need one. I'm involved with apache mynewt: http://mynewt.incubator.apache.org/ and generally interested in seeing the ASF take on more IoT projects! Sterling On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I can

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Mynewt into the Apache Incubator

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Sterling Hughes <sterl...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > As mentioned in the DISCUSS thread, all feedback has been positive on > the Mynewt proposal, so I'd like to call a VOTE to accept Mynewt as a > new ASF incubator project. > > Th

Re: A question: Is it alright to say no to potential podlings?

Just a note to chime in specifically on Mynewt. The simulated tests are very low overhead, its a single process that requires a virtual timer (i.e. elapsed runtime from OS scheduler vs real time) at a 1ms tick. There is no requirement to have physical hardware testing within the ASF project

[VOTE] Accept Mynewt into the Apache Incubator

ynewt.incubator.apache.org * notificati...@mynewt.incubator.apache.org === Git Directory === We'd like to host the source code using Git. === Issue Tracking === * JIRA Project Mynewt (MYNEWT) == Initial Committers == * Sterling Hughes (sterling at apache.org) * William San Filippo (will at r

Re: [DISCUSS] Mynewt Incubation Proposal

Hi All, All feedback thus far has been positive, so unless anyone objects, I plan to move to a VOTE either tomorrow or Monday. Thanks, Sterling On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Sterling Hughes <sterl...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi! > > We would like to start a discussion on a

Re: [DISCUSS] Mynewt Incubation Proposal

>> We have two types of regression tests currently implemented: >> >> - "Native": Simulated on Linux and Mac OS X. We compile the OS & >> libraries with 32-bit GCC, and then use setjmp() and longjmp() to save >> and restore our task stacks, and signals to provide a timing interval. >> Every egg

Re: [DISCUSS] Mynewt Incubation Proposal

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:24 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Hi Sterling, this looks fascinating. > I have a few questions for you: > > How many arches are you targeting initially? I saw ARM and MIPS > commented below, but not sure if that's the initial list, or just a > few notable. >

[DISCUSS] Mynewt Incubation Proposal

t Mynewt (MYNEWT) == Initial Committers == * Sterling Hughes (sterling at apache.org) * William San Filippo (will at runtime.io) * Christopher Collins (chris at runtime.io) * Aditi Hilbert (aditi at runtime.io) * Marko Kiiskila (marko at runtime.io) * Justin Mclean (jmclean at apache.

Access to Wiki for Project Proposal

Hi All, I’m putting together an incubation proposal for a real time operating system project. Can I please have write access to the Wiki, to create the proposal? Username: “Sterling Hughes” Also, if anyone is interested in championing/mentoring a new project - the company I work for has