Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.6-incubating (rc4)

2010-05-09 Thread Thomas Fischer
repository when using it... is this blocking for the release? (just fixed this in trunk) Cheers, Francis On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Thomas Fischer fisc...@seitenbau.net wrote: rat report looks good signatures are ok maven jars are the same as in other distribution - good work

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.6-incubating (rc4)

2010-05-08 Thread Thomas Fischer
rat report looks good signatures are ok maven jars are the same as in other distribution - good work ! source builds However, I found various dependencies which are not compatible with the ASF license. These dependencies are NOT included in any distribution file. However, as I read [1] (which

[RESULT] [IP Clearance] Db Torque Generator

2010-02-10 Thread Thomas Fischer
The vote passed by lazy consesus. No votes were cast. Thomas I have written a replacement for some DB Torque modules that I would like to donate to the ASF. The code base can be found at http://people.apache.org/~tfischer/torque-generator-4-0-proposal.zip The IP clearance form is

[IP Clearance] Db Torque Generator

2010-02-07 Thread Thomas Fischer
I have written a replacement for some DB Torque modules that I would like to donate to the ASF. The code base can be found at http://people.apache.org/~tfischer/torque-generator-4-0-proposal.zip The IP clearance form is available at

incubator group membership for tfischer

2010-02-05 Thread Thomas Fischer
Can someone please add me (tfischer) to the incubator group so I can update the incubator's webste from svn ? I am member of the incubator PMC. Thanks in advance, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: incubator group membership for tfischer

2010-02-05 Thread Thomas Fischer
Can someone please add me (tfischer) to the incubator group so I can update the incubator's webste from svn ? I am member of the incubator PMC. You are already in the incubator group, I'm not sure what goes wrong. Hm, not on minotaur: [tfisc...@minotaur:~]$ groups tfischer tfischer apcvs

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

2009-09-17 Thread Thomas Fischer
+1 (binding) Thomas [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6) Here we go again :-) Hi, We just created an other release candidate for 2.0.5-incubating (rc6). Our community approved the release so we now have a second binding voting round for IPMC Members/Mentors.

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

2009-09-13 Thread Thomas Fischer
I have checked the release and I have found the following issues: - jar files in the maven2 repo and the distribution differ. No idea how this can happen. (see below)) - francis' signature is not in the KEYS.txt on the website. (see below)) Everything else looks good, except the issues sebb

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

2009-09-13 Thread Thomas Fischer
public key is available here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=francisdb Yes, I checked that. But everybody can upload keys to a keyserver and call themselves Francis De Brabandere, so this is no real protection, just convenience. Thomas On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Thomas

Re: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating release, 2nd round

2008-10-03 Thread Thomas Fischer
+1 Good work. Thomas On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, J?rg Reiher wrote: Hello, the community has approved a release of apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy we would now like to request the

Re: [VOTE]apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubatingrelease

2008-09-22 Thread Thomas Fischer
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: Well, IMHO you simply erred on the servlet-api / jsp-api thing (empire-db, as an AL 2.0 licensed project is obviously free to include the jars from Apache tomcat, an AL 2.0 licensed project. The LICENSE and NOTICE files from Tomcat state that

Re: [VOTE]apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubatingrelease

2008-09-22 Thread Thomas Fischer
I'd reckon that we all now agree that the tomcat jars can be included. Assuming that they have not included the jars incorrectly. I will check that the jars in question are those released by tomcat. Perhaps it would be better to double-check with legal? If the jars are ASL licensed, I do

Re: [VOTE]apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubatingrelease

2008-09-22 Thread Thomas Fischer
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, sebb wrote: On 22/09/2008, Thomas Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd reckon that we all now agree that the tomcat jars can be included. Assuming that they have not included the jars incorrectly. I will check that the jars in question are those released

Re: [VOTE]apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubatingrelease

2008-09-19 Thread Thomas Fischer
In fact the jars we had in our struts2-ext 1.0.3 release candidate were taken from Tomcat 5.5. The manifest says: Manifest-Version: 1.0 Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.6.5 Created-By: 1.4.2_11-b06 (Sun Microsystems Inc.) Name: javax/servlet/ Specification-Title: Java API for

Re: [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

2008-09-18 Thread Thomas Fischer
0. There were good reasons for both sides. Regards, Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating andapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating release

2008-09-18 Thread Thomas Fischer
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Rainer Döbele wrote: With the struts-extentions we're in a dilemma. It won't build without servlet-api.jar and jsp-api.jar. There is an info file that informs the user about the requirement for these two jars. Can you point this file out to me ? I am too stupid to find

Re: AW: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.3-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3-incubating release

2008-09-16 Thread Thomas Fischer
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Jörg Reiher wrote: Hello, I've got the following questions regarding the KEYS file and the md5+sha hashes for a release: There is actually a KEYS file located at http://people.apache.org/~reiher/Empire-db-incubating/KEYS Is there something wrong with it or do we have to

Re: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.3-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3-incubating release

2008-09-16 Thread Thomas Fischer
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Rainer D?bele wrote: ... As far as I understand it, there are two major problems with the empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3 release: 1. the missing freemarker info in the NOTICE file (we'll add HSQLDB as well) 2. the inclusion of servlet-api.jar and jsp-api.jar. Plus the

RE: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.3-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3-incubating release

2008-09-06 Thread Thomas Fischer
I checked the Release candidate against the incubator release check list [1] and found the following: - All Files unpack correctly. - The code builds from source. - the status page is not up to date. - All files have a valid md5 sum, sha hash and are signed properly. However, the format of

Re: [vote] JDO out of incubation and into the DB project ( was Re: [discussion] JDO out of incubation)

2005-12-06 Thread Thomas Fischer
+1 Thomas On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: I repurposed the discussion thread for continuity to call for a vote. There has been no concern or objection noted in the last two weeks, so I'll assume that people are comfortable with this. So what say ye? [ ] +1 Graduate JDO