Re: [VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator (revised proposal)

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Lieven Govaerts lieven.govae...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service stack for web mobile applications based on

Re: The podling initial committers issue

I was under the impression that what you describe was the policy - if it is not then is should certainly be clarified. In the event that podlings continue to or are to be given such a choice, I believe that there needs to be a clear understanding between the incoming community and those

Re: The podling initial committers issue

that it is anyone's fault or anyone is right or wrong. We just need the champion/mentor survey questions established. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Sep 25, 2013, at 1:33 PM, larry mccay larry.mc...@gmail.com wrote: That shared understanding seems

Re: [VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Good luck! I would be interested in being a committer on user-grid due to the synergies that seem possible between Apache Knox (incubating) and user-grid. If this is something that you would welcome then I would be happy to join as an initial committer. Regardless, good luck

Re: [VOTE]: Accept Sentry in Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Aug 5, 2013, at 9:23 AM, Shreepadma Venugopalan shreepa...@cloudera.com wrote: Following the discussions last week, I'm calling a vote to accept Sentry as a new project in the Apache Incubator. The proposal draft is available at:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Sentry for Incubator

Correction: I am a member of the PPMC for Knox - sorry for the typo in my previous reply. On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Larry McCay lmc...@hortonworks.com wrote: Hi Shreepadma - Interesting work. Given some more diversity on the mentor list, I would give a +1. Being on the IPMC

Re: [PROPOSAL] Sentry for Incubator

Hi Shreepadma - Interesting work. Given some more diversity on the mentor list, I would give a +1. Being on the IPMC for Knox, I can easily imagine Sentry and Knox being complementary to each other and look forward to contributing to and/or leveraging this work within Knox. I'd be interested

Re: [MENTOR] Re: Missing Release Distribution in Clutch Status?

++ -Original Message- From: larry mccay larry.mc...@gmail.com Reply-To: d...@knox.incubator.apache.org d...@knox.incubator.apache.org Date: Thursday, June 20, 2013 11:46 AM To: d...@knox.incubator.apache.org d...@knox.incubator.apache.org Subject: [MENTOR] Re

<    1   2