2012/10/18 Jukka Zitting :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>> Jukka Zitting wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:03:43 +0200:
>>> a separate ripple LDAP group (but no ripple-pmc yet)
>>
>> What would it be needed for?
>
> Nothing, assuming we put the git reposito
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Jukka Zitting wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:03:43 +0200:
>> a separate ripple LDAP group (but no ripple-pmc yet)
>
> What would it be needed for?
Nothing, assuming we put the git repository at
.../incubator-ripple.git and svn at
Jukka Zitting wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:03:43 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
> > live at domains of the form "${podling}.incubator.apache.o
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
> live at domains of the form "${podling}.incubator.apache.org"?
Sounds like we have consensus that this is a good idea. There were
some conc
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote on Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 16:36:20 +:
> I would be +1 for simply ${podling}.apache.org, per:
Infra doesn't have an opinion on this. I think it's technically
possible.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ge
e form "${podling}.incubator.apache.org"?
>
> This is in relation to infra work on streamlining TLP migrations. (Case
> in point: CMS TLP migrations.) This thread is about the
> externally-visible names, not
e form "${podling}.incubator.apache.org"?
>
> This is in relation to infra work on streamlining TLP migrations. (Case
> in point: CMS TLP migrations.) This thread is about the
> externally-visible names, not
, 2012, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> > >
> > wrote:
> > > Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
> > > live at domains of the form "${podling}.in
On Friday, October 12, 2012, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> >
> wrote:
> > Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
> > live at domains of the form "${podling}.incubator.apache.org
sebb wrote on Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 13:05:06 +0100:
> On 12 October 2012 08:31, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
> > live at domains of the form "${podling}.incubator.apache.org"?
> >
> >
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:07 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 October 2012 12:58, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jukka Zitting
>> wrote:
>>> ...I'd even be fine with ${podling}.apache.org especially if
>>> they've already completed the PODLINGNAMESEARCH process
>>
>>
On 12 October 2012 12:58, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
>> ...I'd even be fine with ${podling}.apache.org especially if
>> they've already completed the PODLINGNAMESEARCH process
>
> Agreed - we could just require a visible standard "in
On 12 October 2012 08:31, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
> live at domains of the form "${podling}.incubator.apache.org"?
>
> This is in relation to infra work on streamlining TLP migrations. (Case
> in
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> ...I'd even be fine with ${podling}.apache.org especially if
> they've already completed the PODLINGNAMESEARCH process
Agreed - we could just require a visible standard "incubating" logo on
podling's websites.
-Bertrand
--
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <
nour.moham...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hmm, didn't notice that thread before, but still, as Joe pointed,
> INFRA should give their opinion about it.
>
Does Daniel's original email not qualify for that? ;)
--
NS
Hi
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>> Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
>> live at domains of the form "${podling}.incubator.apache.org&
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
> live at domains of the form "${podling}.incubator.apache.org"?
Not at all. I'd even be fine with ${podling}.apache.org especially if
they
+1
Good idea
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Alexei Fedotov
wrote:
> I like it -
> that will simplify migrations
> 12.10.2012 11:31 пользователь "Daniel Shahaf"
> написал:
>
>> Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
>> l
I like it -
that will simplify migrations
12.10.2012 11:31 пользователь "Daniel Shahaf"
написал:
> Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
> live at domains of the form "${podling}.incubator.apache.org"?
>
> This is in relation t
Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings
live at domains of the form "${podling}.incubator.apache.org"?
This is in relation to infra work on streamlining TLP migrations. (Case
in point: CMS TLP migrations.) This thread is about the
externally-visible
20 matches
Mail list logo
