On Jul 3, 2006, at 12:10 PM, James Strachan wrote:
On 7/3/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How timely...i've just spent the last hour or two today looking at
AsyncWeb
after Dan Diephouse telling me about it at ApacheCon in Dublin. I'm
interested how this could be used by Tuscany or Syn
On 7/3/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How timely...i've just spent the last hour or two today looking at AsyncWeb
after Dan Diephouse telling me about it at ApacheCon in Dublin. I'm
interested how this could be used by Tuscany or Synapse, so moving it to
Apache sounds good to me.
Anyo
On Jul 3, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Trustin Lee wrote:
Bringing in AsyncWeb and other possible future contributions will
make this
project quite too big to fit into a subproject. We might need an
incubation
process to find a better place for MINA eventually. Any idea? I
will CC
this message to
How timely...i've just spent the last hour or two today looking at AsyncWeb
after Dan Diephouse telling me about it at ApacheCon in Dublin. I'm
interested how this could be used by Tuscany or Synapse, so moving it to
Apache sounds good to me.
...ant
On 7/3/06, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On 7/4/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 3, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Irving, Dave wrote:
>> So, my proposal is, how about we start creating module(s) in
>> MINA for protocols?
>>
>
> Of course, Im biased - but It would be a shame if we re-wrote http
> support on top of Mina over again,
