Re: [DISCUSS] MADlib Incubation Proposal

On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Atri Sharma wrote: > Now that HAWQ vote is closed can we also have a consensus on this proposal > please? I think that would make sense. I'll start a voting thread soon. Thanks, Roman.

Re: [DISCUSS] MADlib Incubation Proposal

Now that HAWQ vote is closed can we also have a consensus on this proposal please? On 3 Sep 2015 02:07, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: > Hi! > > on the heels of the HAWQ proposal, I'd like > to follow with a discussion of accepting MADlib's > community into the ASF Incubator: >

[DISCUSS] MADlib Incubation Proposal

Hi! on the heels of the HAWQ proposal, I'd like to follow with a discussion of accepting MADlib's community into the ASF Incubator: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MADlibProposal There was an extensive discussion within the existing open source community and the overall consensus is

Re: [DISCUSS] MADlib Incubation Proposal

I am very happy to see this proposal. I think combination of HAWQ and MADlib makes it possible to have heavy production level analytics on top of Hadoop (which is fantastic!). That said, given MADlib 's flexibility, I feel it would be a great addition to Apache big data stack in general and I am