Re: [DISCUSS] Maven staging repository mandatory in VOTE

2024-01-24 Thread tison
But yes. Over the years we declared "We release sources ...". So it may be still under-determined. However, improving the release/incubator docs at the ASF level to include a guideline for both what (nice) to do and how to do it should help. The real world relies heavily on binary distributions

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven staging repository mandatory in VOTE

2024-01-24 Thread tison
> if the presence of a staging repo should be mandatory in the VOTE thread. >From a technical view, since the RM anyway stages and releases Maven artifacts, it's not difficult to include a link in the vote thread. Best, tison. tison 于2024年1月24日周三 18:25写道: > > > if a maven release (or more

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven staging repository mandatory in VOTE

2024-01-24 Thread tison
> if a maven release (or more general a release of convenience binaries) > requires a PMC vote or not? If it's an Apache release (endorsed by the ASF, a.k.a. the (P)PMC), it requires. You may search "Maven" on this page [1] to see how OpenDAL stages and releases Maven artifacts. You can also

[DISCUSS] Maven staging repository mandatory in VOTE

2024-01-24 Thread Stamatis Zampetakis
Hey everyone, There are many ASF projects publishing artifacts to Maven repositories and there are certain rules and guidelines [1, 2] in place for those distributions. I assume that the PMC should ensure that the artifacts there conform to the rules before releasing them officially thus I was