Sorry if I'm late to the party, but my 2 cents...
The more I read about this, the more I latch onto Justin's Observers notion.
As a non-Apache Member, non-IPMC, PPMC member for OODT, I feel like I am
qualified to vote on a release in the sense that I am closer to the code than
Justin (sorry to
Unlike the observer role. It's very close to the current signing off of board
reports by mentors but forces them to do a little more than put there name to a
piece of electronic paper.
Personally I imagined my binding vote, as a mentor, to indicate a) the project
debs want this tongi ahead
Sorry damned iPhone autocorrect. First word should be I like
Sent from my mobile device.
On 17 Aug 2010, at 09:38, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
Unlike the observer role. It's very close to the current signing off of board
reports by mentors but forces them to do a little more than
LOL know problem Ross ;)
On 8/17/10 1:46 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
Sorry damned iPhone autocorrect. First word should be I like
Sent from my mobile device.
On 17 Aug 2010, at 09:38, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
Unlike the observer role. It's very close to the
[ CCing gene...@incubator as I think I can now place my finger a bit
as to why I'm discomforted with Greg's proposal in the OODT context ;
and more importantly, another potential experiment at the end; leaving
context in for those on gene...@incubator ]
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Mattmann,
Hey Justin,
Thanks so much for your thoughtful reply. My comments below:
See, here's where I get a bit discomforted by this entire process: I
honestly don't feel that I deserve a vote on OODT releases. I've
known you and Dave for long enough that I have no concerns advising
the OODT
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:08, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hey Justin,
Thanks so much for your thoughtful reply. My comments below:
See, here's where I get a bit discomforted by this entire process: I
honestly don't feel that I deserve a vote on OODT
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
So basically you are moving more towards Joe's proposal, that the PPMC would
have the binding VOTEs in e.g., new committers/PMC members, and on releases?
Of course, with the caveats below, as you
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
You know when to vote and *how* to vote. I see no reason to deny your vote.
Of course. It's always seemed awkward if you can't contribute
technically to suddenly have a binding vote. I'm sure if I *wanted*
to learn how to
