Am 12.06.2011 01:20, schrieb Henri Yandell:
It is a large project; but so what? I thought Harmony had no chance of
being coded and that went very quickly, showing how well maximum
openness can walk the path between corporate, startup and hobby needs.
You think Apache Harmony is a comparable
Am 12.06.2011 01:20, schrieb Henri Yandell:
It is a large project; but so what? I thought Harmony had no chance of
being coded and that went very quickly, showing how well maximum
openness can walk the path between corporate, startup and hobby needs.
You think Apache Harmony is a comparable
On 2011/5/12 9:5 Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com wrote:
Nearly the whole and very active community in Brasil switched to LO. A
lot of very brilliant and active members of the german community are
working now at LO, doing a very good job.
In General, the Brazilian users keeps using
On Jun 12, 2011, at 3:01 AM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 01:20, schrieb Henri Yandell:
It is a large project; but so what? I thought Harmony had no chance of
being coded and that went very quickly, showing how well maximum
openness can walk the path between corporate, startup and
On 6/12/2011 4:03 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Not that much;
* Same players.
* Same importance.
Really?
I'm pretty certain there is 0.05% overlap between the Office Suite
and Java Runtime mechanics of either Sun or IBM. They probably never
even shared so much as a VP, although I could be
Ketih,
I think Italo is incorrect saying voting no would be a defeat for
free software. It is an honest mistake. People don't know what else
could happen, because alternatives are not being discussed.
They have been discussed. Even at this list. We have discussed to say
no to OOo at the ASF.
Hi,
Am 11.06.2011 06:17, schrieb Keith Curtis:
I think LibreOffice people are quiet for various reasons:
Everyone here votes on his own behalf, for his own reasons and at the
time he feels to be the right time.
There is currently no need to vote on anybody's behalf (really - nobody
here
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Ketih,
I think Italo is incorrect saying voting no would be a defeat for
free software. It is an honest mistake. People don't know what else
could happen, because alternatives are not being discussed.
They have
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 11 Jun 2011, at 11:23, Simos Xenitellis simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
The part about the ASF undertaking only a reference implementation for
the ODF format
was not discussed.
Yes it was. In fact it was the suggestion that OO.o should
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Simos Xenitellis
simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
Now that you mention it; the voting started at time (7.02pm local time).
Benson Margulies voted at 7.03pm.
You voted at 7.05pm.
Is the voting start time pre-announced?
The voting time was pre-announced on
I think Italo is incorrect saying voting no would be a defeat for
free software. It is an honest mistake. People don't know what else
could happen, because alternatives are not being discussed.
They have been discussed. Even at this list. We have discussed to say
no to OOo at the ASF. We
On Jun 11, 2011, at 6:23 AM, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Christian Grobmeier
The part about the ASF undertaking only a reference implementation for
the ODF format
was not discussed. This would probably make the Free Software
Foundation (FSF) happy.
The
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 11 Jun 2011, at 11:23, Simos Xenitellis simos.li...@googlemail.com
wrote:
The part about the ASF undertaking only a reference implementation for
the ODF format
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 11 Jun 2011, at 11:23, Simos Xenitellis simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
The part about the ASF undertaking only a reference implementation for
the ODF format
was
/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3cBANLkTi=xbf7sg1nc2jjrd-obxofukki...@mail.gmail.com%3e
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 11:55
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ... ]
Since Oracle was willing to transfer the OOo source code copyrights
For us outsiders, can you explain who is allowed to vote and in what way,
please?
S.
Anyone is allowed to vote. If you vote against, please, explain why.
Most of votes do not count anyway, negative votes are usually
addressed.
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:45 PM,
Simon,
Anyone interested can VOTE. If u see some of the votes they have
(binding) in the text, those are from folks on the incubator pmc.
Ultimately if we see a whole bunch of -1's then we check which way the
pmc voted to decide if the proposal was accepted or not.
So please go ahead and vote to
Awesome, thanks.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.comwrote:
Anyone is allowed to vote. If you vote against, please, explain why.
Most of votes do not count anyway, negative votes are usually
addressed.
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Sorry for ignorance but what does binding - non-binding mean?
--
Ian
Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ)
www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940
The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth,
Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England
binding is used by members of the incubator pmc [1]
-- dims
[1] http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for ignorance but what does binding - non-binding mean?
--
Ian
Ofqual Accredited IT
On 10 June 2011 17:49, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
Simon,
Anyone interested can VOTE. If u see some of the votes they have
(binding) in the text, those are from folks on the incubator pmc.
Ultimately if we see a whole bunch of -1's then we check which way the
pmc voted to
On 6/10/2011 11:45 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
For us outsiders, can you explain who is allowed to vote and in what way,
please?
Everyone is welcome to vote.
Binding votes include all Incubator Project Management Committee members.
Non-binding votes can and do influence the opinions of committee
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 05:45:03PM +0100, Simon Phipps wrote:
For us outsiders, can you explain who is allowed to vote and in what way,
please?
Official policy:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Entry+to+Incubation
Entry Into Incubation
...
In order
Maybe the people from LibreOffice are not voting against because, even
though they believe there could have been better solutions, given the
current situation they prefer that OOo is approved as a podling: see
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/5824 for
a more
25 matches
Mail list logo
