It sounds like we have consensus. Is there a minimum voting period? Any
chance we could get this through in time for the NiFi proposal to make the
Board meeting this week?
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:26 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 14 June 2015 at 17:52, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
72 hours is customary as minimum. That would miss the Board meeting this
week.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com wrote:
It sounds like we have consensus. Is there a minimum voting period? Any
chance we could get this through in time for the NiFi proposal to make
I was hoping to see how things settle out through the rest of the day
and then kick off a vote tomorrow or Wednesday. We had hoped that if
all goes well we'd be an option for the July meeting. So, no rush I
think.
Thanks
Joe
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org
Niclas,
I agree that the scope could be improved. It is a tough balancing act
of course. How would about this modification:
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Foundation's purpose to establish a Project
I'm +1, please feel free to carry my +1 through to
the VOTE.
Cheers,
Chris
From: jan i [j...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 10:04 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Graduate NiFi from the Apache Incubator
thanks
Hi
Sorry for top posting, I do understand why the resolution is being changed,
however it this
really the correct place to do it. The community must be behind and
agreeing to the resolution,
so changes should in my opinion by discussed on your dev@ list.
The IPMC should be presented with a
On 14 June 2015 at 17:52, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
The community agreed on what we posted originally. Just trying to be
responsive to niclas concerns in the spirit of the discussion thread.
I was not suggesting otherwise.
I have forwarded the thread to our dev list which is where
Adjusted to clarify the 'realtime' reference which can be misleading:
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
Committee charged with the creation and
The community agreed on what we posted originally. Just trying to be
responsive to niclas concerns in the spirit of the discussion thread.
I have forwarded the thread to our dev list which is where the adjustment
to 'interactive' came from. Should these minor rephrasings give pause in
the nifi
It is less generic, but I think I am not in a position to determine what is
suitable. The community + mentors should be a better group to discuss it.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Niclas,
I agree that the scope could be improved. It is a tough balancing
From the peanut gallery;
Doesn't
related to the automated and managed flow of information between
systems
apply to at least half of all software out there?
In other words, the scope is very wide, and could include anything from
SNMP to Apache Mesos and much much more. I think the Board will
On 12 June 2015 at 09:18, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
Although it's not a strict requirement, the board likes to have at
least one ASF member in the new project's PMC.
Unless I missed someone I don't think that's the case in proposed PMC
members list. It looks
Hi Sergio,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Sergio Fernández wik...@apache.org wrote:
...I could jump in case is considered necessary.
Unfortunately I can't promise that much in terms of code contribution...
It's fine IMO to have 1-2 ASF members on the PMC even if they're not
very active in
Hi,
Although it's not a strict requirement, the board likes to have at
least one ASF member in the new project's PMC.
Unless I missed someone I don't think that's the case in proposed PMC
members list. It looks like none of the proposed PMC members are
committers in other projects, which makes
Hi Bertrand,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
The best way to fix this is for one or two of your mentors who are ASF
members to stay on the new PMC, are any of them interested?
Initially I was thinking to step off on graduation.
But I could
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:00 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
...one reason to be in incubator is to learn the apache way and that
seems hard to learn without other apache people on the project...
Not sure what you mean - the Nifi mentors have voted to graduate it,
which indicates that they
Writing as a member and a mentor, I think that the NiFi podling will
do fine without the 'usual' ASF member that Bertrand is asking about.
However, because I think they'll do fine, I'll sign up if it makes
people more comfy, secure in my belief that I will be a maytag
repairman.
On Fri, Jun 12,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:00 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
...one reason to be in incubator is to learn the apache way and that
seems hard to learn without other apache people on the project...
Not
Hello
it would be nice to see a bit of statistics like number of releases in
incubator, growth in incubator…
Mailing lists:
The dev mailing list has 123 legit addresses on it and is quite active
for discussion, votes, feature ideas, etc.. We’ve just recently
created a user list as requested
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com wrote:
...I have no reason to believe either my engagement or the PPMC's
willingness
to reach out to or listen to what I have to say will
thanks for the responses I will cast a +1 at vote time.
sorry for asking the questions, but I was insecure.
rgds
jan i
On Friday, June 12, 2015, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean sure makes more sense than me.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com wrote:
...I have no reason to believe either my engagement or the PPMC's willingness
to reach out to or listen to what I have to say will change upon
graduation, so I don't think they need a checkbox ASF member on the initial
PMC
22 matches
Mail list logo
