On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 3:50 PM Jim Apple wrote:
> Thank you for the responses.
>
> >> 5. Make sure the Whimsy page applies to all projects. For instance,
> >> Impala releases are source tarballs, so if "Binary Distribution
> >> Licensing" means something about a non-source-tarball release
> >> a
Thank you for the responses.
>> 5. Make sure the Whimsy page applies to all projects. For instance,
>> Impala releases are source tarballs, so if "Binary Distribution
>> Licensing" means something about a non-source-tarball release
>> artefact, it's not meaningful for Impala.
>>
>
> Hmm that's int
Jim,
Thanks for the input!
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:22 PM Jim Apple wrote:
> Here are some suggestions:
>
> 1. Only make this the reporting structure for new podlings.
> Grandfather in old podlings to the old structure, since they may
> already have workflows built around it. Impala does.
>
S
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Jim Apple wrote:
> Here are some suggestions:
>
> 1. Only make this the reporting structure for new podlings.
> Grandfather in old podlings to the old structure, since they may
> already have workflows built around it. Impala does.
We don't need to delete the old
Here are some suggestions:
1. Only make this the reporting structure for new podlings.
Grandfather in old podlings to the old structure, since they may
already have workflows built around it. Impala does.
2. Provide a clear description of the meaning and formatting of each
field in comments on th
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:04 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Jim,
>
> For your specific cases, if all you want is to remove red text:
>
> - for :sga: enter the date in -MM-DD format of when the ASF Secretary
> acknowledged your SGA. Based on the records I have its 2016-03-15
> - For the :asfCopyri
John, can you confirm appropriate values for Edgent in order to clear up all
the red under “Licensing”?
From http://incubator.apache.org/projects/edgent.html these seem to be the
appropriate values (from that copyrights section as well as 1.0.0 release date
of 2016-12-15):
:sga:2016-03-11
:asf
Jim,
For your specific cases, if all you want is to remove red text:
- for :sga: enter the date in -MM-DD format of when the ASF Secretary
acknowledged your SGA. Based on the records I have its 2016-03-15
- For the :asfCopyright: and :distributionRights: attributes, I would use
2017-01-20 as
I'm confused. The message to podlings@ said "If you're not sure what
to fill out, feel free to reach out."
It sounds like there is no set way yet to fill it out.
What can I do to get the bolded, red, inaccurate scare messages off of
our whimsy page?
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:30 PM, John D. Ament
Good points Dave. To be honest, since this is a prototype I don't have
answers any more than "If you think it should do that, we can make it do
that"
What I did have in mind:
---
:issueTracker: jira|github|bugzilla
:wiki: if using confluence, their space key
:jira: if using jira, their issue key
Hi John -
These are excellent questions. I see each of these as being tuples of various
kinds.
For example :sga: could have multiple grants each of which has a date and a
file name to refer to in the foundation records.
The path to the source repository is missing completely.
Some of these it
11 matches
Mail list logo