Re: [QUESTION] Code grant or IP clearance?

2023-01-24 Thread Craig Russell
Hi Jason, What Justin said. Most projects ask all contributors for ICLAs, but only require them for "significant" contributors. If a contributor is not particularly active and has a few merged PRs then it's ok to use the Apache License 2.0 clause 5. I expect that most of the significant contr

Re: [QUESTION] Code grant or IP clearance?

2023-01-24 Thread Jason Porter
Thanks Justin. That very well could take some time :) Drools has 215 contributors, jBPM 128, and Kogito 230. Granted there is a large amount of overlap, but that's a lot of contributors. Jason Porter Software Engineer He/Him/His IBM On Jan 23, 2023, at 19:41, Justin Mclean wrote: HI, For K

Re: [QUESTION] Code grant or IP clearance?

2023-01-23 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > For KIE, all of the software that will be part of the podling is already > licensed as ASL 2.0. Do we need to have a code grant, or simply pass an IP > clearance? While it is under ASL 2.0 a grant would be preferred but not required. All incubating projects still need to pass IP clearanc

[QUESTION] Code grant or IP clearance?

2023-01-23 Thread Jason Porter
For KIE, all of the software that will be part of the podling is already licensed as ASL 2.0. Do we need to have a code grant, or simply pass an IP clearance? I realsize that trademarks are a different question and will require a grant. Jason Porter Software Engineer He/Him/His IBM