There are 5 approving votes, all of which are binding: * Sergio Fernández * Seetharam Venkatesh * Justin Mclean * Jean-Baptise Onofré * John D. Ament
There are no disapproving votes. We'll proceed with this release as staged. Thanks everyone! ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 at 14:10 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating To: <general@incubator.apache.org> The specified duration is over, I'm hereby closing the vote. Thanks a lot for your participation! I'll tally the results in a separate thread. Cheers, Aljoscha On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 at 21:26 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: I'm going to switch my vote to +1 for the release. Other issues are issues outside of this podling's domain. John On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 9:31 AM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 3:23 AM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > So, with respect to the DEPENDENCIES file we're still good to go and > accept > > that a rat check won't work on the release? > > IMO it’s fine. JFYI you you ran rat manually on the release it shows a few > more hits, but none IMO are cause for concern. > > > Agreed, the rat/DEPENDENCIES file is a non-issue for the release. > > -1 due to the kinesis library issue. > > > > It it picked up any source files without headers (which it doesn’t) it > would be OK to fix for the next release. > > Thanks, > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
