FYI - I prepared a patch "Mention that there is no implicit +1 in
votes" [1] to include this information.
Feel free to give it a review and improve the expression.
Best,
tison.
[1] https://github.com/apache/www-site/pull/338
Ayush Saxena 于2024年1月9日周二 20:56写道：
>
> > I may prepare a patch on
> h
> I may prepare a patch on
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html to mention this
explicitly.
Still doing this would be helpful & maybe an explicit line in the
package release section as well [1], that a RM "can" vote as well, I
have seen couple of folks with this confusion that since you c
Aha. I saw "Here is my +1 (binding)." at the bottom of the first mail now >_<
Best,
tison.
PJ Fanning 于2024年1月8日周一 18:15写道：
>
> Thanks Tison for checking. I did vote on the initial email.
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/og2mtjv4nsgrh1mc96cfxbqzz8poysp8
>
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 11:10, tison
Thanks Tison for checking. I did vote on the initial email.
https://lists.apache.org/thread/og2mtjv4nsgrh1mc96cfxbqzz8poysp8
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 11:10, tison wrote:
>
> Hi PJ,
>
> Congrats.
>
> I was told that the RM who drives the release doesn't implicitly vote
> a +1. So you'd better cast y
Hi PJ,
Congrats.
I was told that the RM who drives the release doesn't implicitly vote
a +1. So you'd better cast your own +1 the next time when running a
release.
But I don't find a policy sentence to mention it. While I think the
argument is valid, I may prepare a patch on
https://www.apache.o
The vote passes with 3 +1s and no negative votes. All votes were binding.
Vote Thread
https://lists.apache.org/thread/og2mtjv4nsgrh1mc96cfxbqzz8poysp8
Votes
Zili Chen (tison)
Matthew de Detrich
PJ Fanning
I will proceed with the release and make the announcements.
Thanks to everyone who partici
