Alex Karasulu and Owen O'Malley have both volunteered on the private
list and communicated to me off list their willingness to be mentors.
So hopefully that is resolved as well.
Alan.
On Mar 12, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Upayavira wrote:
I am concerned that none of the proposed mentors were
Perfect.
Upayavira
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:57 -0700, Alan Gates ga...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Alex Karasulu and Owen O'Malley have both volunteered on the private
list and communicated to me off list their willingness to be mentors.
So hopefully that is resolved as well.
Alan.
On Mar
I am concerned that none of the proposed mentors were Incubator PMC
members at the time of the proposal. I believe Alan Gates is now joining
the Incubator PMC, which is great. However, I'd like to see mentorship
resolved before we proceed.
Upayavira
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:26 +0200, Alex Karasulu
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
I am concerned that none of the proposed mentors were Incubator PMC
members at the time of the proposal. I believe Alan Gates is now joining
the Incubator PMC, which is great. However, I'd like to see mentorship
resolved
On 3/12/2011 4:21 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
I am concerned that none of the proposed mentors were Incubator PMC
members at the time of the proposal. I believe Alan Gates is now joining
the Incubator PMC, which is great.
The committers and mentors (as listed in the original proposal) have
voted for hcatalog as the new name. Web searches I did did not turn
up any conflicts with this name.
Assuming no one is aware of any naming conflicts, what's our next
step? Do we just need Alex to rescind his -1 vote?
Since the only issue raised during voting was the naming problem, now
resolved, I'd say call the vote a success and get on with it.
Craig
On Mar 11, 2011, at 3:43 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
The committers and mentors (as listed in the original proposal) have
voted for hcatalog as the new name.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:13 AM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.comwrote:
Since the only issue raised during voting was the naming problem, now
resolved, I'd say call the vote a success and get on with it.
+1
On Mar 11, 2011, at 3:43 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
The committers and
It's going to be a slap in the face of the OW guys if we let it fly.
I don't know if it matters in these, er, matters, but the OW in HOWL stands
for their trademarked name.
In any event, the community has agreed to change the name, so let's put this
to bed and move on.
--- Noel
I agree we shouldn't move forward until we've come to an agreement on
the naming issue. I have no desire to start this project off with
this hanging over it. I have continued this thread on legal-discuss,
giving more context to hopefully get the best possible input there. I
will also
On Mar 9, 2011, at 8:23 AM, Alan Gates wrote:
Some context here for you. Howl is a project that was recently accepted to
the Incubator. It is a proposed new component in the Hadoop eco system.
There is significant concern in the Incubator that this will clash with the
name of the Howl
There as well existed an open source project called Howl in 2005 or so
which implemented Zeroconf (Apple calls the commercial incarnation
Bonjour).
See: http://www.porchdogsoft.com/ - About
Howl is available in the FreeBSD ports collection and on SF.NET
-
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
We might want to defer entry into the incubator until determining the
trademark issue if one exists.
While I agree that resolving sooner is better than later, I don't
believe that entrance to the incubator should be
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org
wrote:
We might want to defer entry into the incubator until determining the
trademark issue if one exists.
While I agree that resolving sooner is
I think there's agreement in the community of the project formerly
known as Howl that we need to change the name as part of starting out
in the Incubator. We're discussing alternatives and will propose
something, hopefully with clear IP, soon.
Alan.
On Mar 9, 2011, at 1:09 PM, Alex
We are taking it seriously. We (Howl mentors and committers)
discussed this and the consensus seemed to be we wanted to stay with
the name if possible. The feedback on this list was mixed, with many
for changing it and some not worried about it. So we wanted to stick
with it for now and
Hi Alan,
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Alan Gates ga...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
We are taking it seriously. We (Howl mentors and committers) discussed
this and the consensus seemed to be we wanted to stay with the name if
possible. The feedback on this list was mixed, with many for changing
On Mar 8, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Alan Gates ga...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
We are taking it seriously. We (Howl mentors and committers) discussed
this and the consensus seemed to be we wanted to stay with the name if
possible. The
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.comwrote:
On Mar 8, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Alan Gates ga...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
We are taking it seriously. We (Howl mentors and committers) discussed
this
What about the naming conflict with Howl from ObjectWeb
[0]http://howl.ow2.org/?
Anyone address this serious issue yet? I pointed this out a while back and
frankly am shocked not to see this resolved.
HOWL has been around long before this project: 6 years
[1]http://goo.gl/J0uJR.
So you're
1- If there are still some people in the initial committers list with
no filed ICLA then you should start the process [1].
2- Mentors should start initiating the podling process steps [2].
1- http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html
2- http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html
On
With 9 binding +1 votes and no -1s, the vote passes. I'll take the
naming issue back to the Howl contributors to discuss what we want to
do about it.
What's the next step now?
Alan.
On Feb 22, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
I would like to call a vote on accepting Howl as an
+1
Ralph
On Feb 22, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
I would like to call a vote on accepting Howl as an Incubator project. The
proposal is available at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HowlProposal. You
can see the discussion from the proposal thread at http://tinyurl.com/5w7y9p9.
The naming conflict was brought up but as far as I'm concerned it has
not been resolved.
+1 for incubating.
Change the name, before or after starting incubation. I can suggest to
you it's easier to change the name before starting.
Craig
On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:53 AM, ant elder wrote:
The
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Alan Gates ga...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
I would like to call a vote on accepting Howl as an Incubator project...
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
+1
Sounds like a welcome addition to the Hadoop space.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 2/23/11, Alan Gates ga...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
From: Alan Gates ga...@yahoo-inc.com
Subject: [VOTE] Accept Howl as an Incubator Project
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Wednesday, February 23, 2011, 12
+1
Tommaso
2011/2/23 Alan Gates ga...@yahoo-inc.com
I would like to call a vote on accepting Howl as an Incubator project. The
proposal is available at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HowlProposal.
You can see the discussion from the proposal thread at
http://tinyurl.com/5w7y9p9.
Alan.
+1
However there might be a name conflict with the Howl transaction log over at
object web here:
http://howl.ow2.org/
http://howl.ow2.org/Originally from the title, I immediately thought the
proposal was for OW's HOWL implementation to enter the incubator.
Best,
Alex
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011
+1 (non-binding)
-- leif
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Feb 23, 2011, at 4:55 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
+1
However there might be a name conflict with the Howl transaction log over at
object web here:
http://howl.ow2.org/
http://howl.ow2.org/Originally from the title, I immediately thought the
proposal was for OW's HOWL implementation
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 23, 2011, at 4:55 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
+1
However there might be a name conflict with the Howl transaction log over at
object web here:
http://howl.ow2.org/
http://howl.ow2.org/Originally from the
http://www.porchdogsoft.com/ as well provides a Zeroconf
implementation called Howl and I am not sure whether Porchdog Software
finally got acquired by Apple. The favicon and certain information on
the site could make you think Apple did exactly that.
Cheers
Daniel
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:17
The naming conflict issue was brought up and resolved during the
discussion of the proposal. Please see http://tinyurl.com/5w7y9p9.
Alan.
On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:22 AM, dsh wrote:
http://www.porchdogsoft.com/ as well provides a Zeroconf
implementation called Howl and I am not sure whether
The naming conflict was discussed but it doesn't seem resolved to me -
even just in this vote thread there's a bunch of people bringing it up
again. I'd guess thats just going to continue while the name is kept,
which be avoided by picking a new name now. I expect there will be
enough votes in
+1.
The name can be changed until graduation.
Hadrian
On Feb 23, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Feb 23, 2011, at 4:55 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
+1
However there might be a name conflict with the Howl transaction log over at
object web here:
http://howl.ow2.org/
+1
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1.
The name can be changed until graduation.
Hadrian
On Feb 23, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Feb 23, 2011, at 4:55 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
+1
However there might be a name conflict with the
I would like to call a vote on accepting Howl as an Incubator
project. The proposal is available at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HowlProposal
. You can see the discussion from the proposal thread at http://tinyurl.com/5w7y9p9
.
Alan.
--
Abstract
Howl is a table
37 matches
Mail list logo
