On 25.02.2013 05:44, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Thanks to all who voted. Obviously, I'm +1 (binding) on the proposal.
With 14 +1s (10 binding) the vote passes.
I'll start the work to get the podling started.
thanks,
Arun
On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:26 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Hi Folks,
Thanks
Thanks to all who voted. Obviously, I'm +1 (binding) on the proposal.
With 14 +1s (10 binding) the vote passes.
I'll start the work to get the podling started.
thanks,
Arun
On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:26 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Hi Folks,
Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 02/21/2013 04:52 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
+1 (binding)
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/19/13 8:26 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
+1 (non-binding)
sharad
+1.
Alan.
On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:26 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Hi Folks,
Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to call a VOTE for
acceptance of Apache Tez into the Incubator. I'll let the vote run till into
this weekend (Sun 2/24 6pm PST).
[ ] +1 Accept Apache Tez into
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
+1 (binding)
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/19/13 8:26 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to call a
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
+Vinod
On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:26 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Hi Folks,
Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to call a VOTE for
acceptance of Apache Tez into the Incubator. I'll let the vote run till into
this weekend (Sun 2/24 6pm PST).
[ ] +1
+1 (binding) -C
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to call a VOTE for
acceptance of Apache Tez into the Incubator. I'll let the vote run till into
this weekend (Sun 2/24 6pm PST).
[ ]
+1
2013/2/20 Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com:
Hi Folks,
Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to call a VOTE for
acceptance of Apache Tez into the Incubator. I'll let the vote run till into
this weekend (Sun 2/24 6pm PST).
[ ] +1 Accept Apache Tez into the Incubator
[
+1 (binding).
On Feb 21, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
+1
2013/2/20 Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com:
Hi Folks,
Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to call a VOTE for
acceptance of Apache Tez into the Incubator. I'll let the vote run till into
this weekend
+1 ( non-binding )
-- Hitesh
On Feb 19, 2013, at 8:26 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Hi Folks,
Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to call a VOTE for
acceptance of Apache Tez into the Incubator. I'll let the vote run till into
this weekend (Sun 2/24 6pm PST).
[ ] +1
+1 (non-binding), glad to see that finally the idea of having a DAG AM is
getting traction.
Arun, would you please clarify how Tez is (conceptually) different from the
Workflow AM proposed in MAPREDUCE-4495/OOZIE-1178?
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Hitesh Shah hit...@hortonworks.com wrote:
+1 (binding) -jakob
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.comwrote:
+1 (non-binding), glad to see that finally the idea of having a DAG AM is
getting traction.
Arun, would you please clarify how Tez is (conceptually) different from the
Workflow AM proposed in
Arun, would you please clarify how Tez is (conceptually) different from
the Workflow AM proposed in MAPREDUCE-4495/OOZIE-1178?
I would also like to understand this as well. They seem largely identical,
but the Tez proposal has a set of initial committers disjunctive from those
who performed the
On Feb 20, 2013, at 1:38 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
Arun, would you please clarify how Tez is (conceptually) different from
the Workflow AM proposed in MAPREDUCE-4495/OOZIE-1178?
I would also like to understand this as well. They seem largely identical,
but the Tez proposal has a set of
+1 (binding)
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/19/13 8:26 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to call a VOTE for
acceptance of Apache Tez into the Incubator. I'll let the vote run till
into this weekend (Sun 2/24 6pm PST).
[ ]
Hi Folks,
Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to call a VOTE for
acceptance of Apache Tez into the Incubator. I'll let the vote run till into
this weekend (Sun 2/24 6pm PST).
[ ] +1 Accept Apache Tez into the Incubator
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't accept Apache Tez into
+1 (binding).
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to call a VOTE for
acceptance of Apache Tez into the Incubator. I'll let the vote run till into
this weekend (Sun 2/24 6pm PST).
[ ] +1
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to call a VOTE for
acceptance of Apache Tez into the Incubator. I'll let the vote run till
into this weekend (Sun 2/24 6pm PST).
[ ]
19 matches
Mail list logo