Hi all,
the discussions on projects@ lead to the new name
PhotArk
as a play on photo archive. If anybody wants to
change their vote one way or another based on the
name, please do so until Mon 2008-08-18 15:00 GMT.
cheers,
Roland
I realize I hadn't voted earlier although I participated in the name
discussion.
+1 for incubation.
Craig
On Aug 16, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Roland Weber wrote:
Hi all,
the discussions on projects@ lead to the new name
PhotArk
as a play on photo archive. If anybody wants to
change their
+1 for incubation.
sounds like a cool project.
WILL
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I realize I hadn't voted earlier although I participated in the name
discussion.
+1 for incubation.
Craig
On Aug 16, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Roland Weber wrote:
We're still discussing naming options, including
the option to stick with PicaGalley, on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll keep this vote open until we settle on a name,
and a few days longer if that is not PicaGalley.
cheers,
Roland
-
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
I also think the names are too similar
I have re-opened the naming discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should we keep this vote running, or should we start a
new one after we settle for a different
+1
Niall
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
please vote on accepting project PicaGalley
(originally proposed under the name of Caitrin)
for incubation, with the Incubator PMC as the Sponsor.
This vote runs until Sun 2008-08-10 24:00 GMT,
unless
Angela Cymbalak wrote:
This hasn't been discussed but I don't think that there is a
trademark issue.
Picasa and PicaGalley? Why would there be any trademark issue at all? Pica
is hardly something that Google can claim as a prefix. Picasa is a play on
the artist's name, and would be
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 04:05:04 Craig L Russell wrote:
I don't think the names PicaGalley and Picasa are similar at all.
Pica is pronounced with a long i and stress on the i. Picasa has a
short i and stress on the first a. So to me they don't even share
pica, which
Hello Will,
Will Glass-Husain wrote:
Is there a potential trademark issue with Google? I worry about the
similarity in name to Picasa, especially given they both are web-based photo
galleries.
I wasn't aware of that. We came to the name of
PicaGalley from Piccadilly. A Google search
didn't
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure how similar these names are,
except for their starting with pic-a, which
is certainly not uncommon for software that is
meant to handle pictures. But if others share
your concern, I'm open for discussing
Jukka Zitting wrote:
I also think the names are too similar
I have re-opened the naming discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should we keep this vote running, or should we start a
new one after we settle for a different name?
cheers,
Roland
How about phoshow? Photo/Show :)
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
I also think the names are too similar
I have re-opened the naming discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should we keep this vote running, or should we start a
new one
Oops. Sorry:
http://whatstoeatla.blogspot.com/2008/06/phoshowi-swear-i-didnt-make-it-up.html
I was half kidding. I think phoshizzle is out too :(
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:16 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about phoshow? Photo/Show :)
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:14 PM,
I don't think the names PicaGalley and Picasa are similar at all.
Pica is pronounced with a long i and stress on the i. Picasa has a
short i and stress on the first a. So to me they don't even share
pica, which is a very common term in the printing/publishing industry.
The name is nowhere
IMO there is no need to revote on the name change. It is a
technicality, and according to me an exit criterium, not an entry
criterium.
How about calling the project Snapshot (or Snapshots)? Apache
Snapshot does have a ring to it, though it might be confusing as hell
when you're deploying
Will,
This hasn't been discussed but I don't think that there is a
trademark issue. From the Picasa Web site [1] Picasa will:
- Locate and organize all the photos on your computer.
- Edit and add effects to your photos with a few simple clicks.
- Share your photos with others through
+1 Accept PicaGalley for incubation
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--8
[X] +1 Accept PicaGalley for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
It will be interesting to see how this comes together; I hope to see the
I'm not convinced. Picasa has a downloadable desktop app too. And the
names are awfully similar. Wouldn't it be simpler to avoid the hassle
of trademark conflict and pain of renaming later by changing it now?
It sounds like a cool project. Won't argue this further, but it does
seem like
Hi all,
please vote on accepting project PicaGalley
(originally proposed under the name of Caitrin)
for incubation, with the Incubator PMC as the Sponsor.
This vote runs until Sun 2008-08-10 24:00 GMT,
unless major discussions ensue. Votes of IPMC
members are binding, a minimum of three +1 is
+1 of course
When this came in as Caitrin, it was a proposal
for a codebase with no community. Since then, it
has changed into a little community without a
specific codebase, but several codebases to draw
from or use as a starting base. I find this a
much more convincing proposition. Convincing
Sounds interesting. +1
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 20:02 +0200, Roland Weber wrote:
Hi all,
please vote on accepting project PicaGalley
(originally proposed under the name of Caitrin)
for incubation, with the Incubator PMC as the Sponsor.
This vote runs until Sun 2008-08-10 24:00 GMT,
unless
+1
Martijn
(who points at jalbum.net as a photo gallery generating Java product,
though partly LGPL, partly closed source)
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
please vote on accepting project PicaGalley
(originally proposed under the name of
Is there a potential trademark issue with Google? I worry about the
similarity in name to Picasa, especially given they both are web-based photo
galleries.
Apologies if this has already been discussed.
WILL
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
24 matches
Mail list logo
