On Nov 28, 2007 6:49 PM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007, at 5:49 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
snip
IMHO this involves both a wider and narrower issue
1. for this narrow issue, approval has already been given. insisting
that mentors in particular prepare
On Nov 22, 2007 6:29 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy
Discussion to what? I see the RAT set up thread, but there was no
discussion of a general policy change. Robert said that infrastructure
approval should
On Nov 28, 2007, at 5:49 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Nov 22, 2007 6:29 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy
Discussion to what? I see the RAT set up thread, but there was no
discussion of a general policy
+1 (non binding)
Gilles
2007/11/22, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy,
I'd like to formally propose adopting the policy change in https://
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-71
[ ] +1 Allow podlings with karma to
On Nov 22, 2007 2:03 AM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X ] +1 Allow podlings with karma to set up their own infrastructure
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi,
On Nov 22, 2007 3:03 AM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy,
I'd like to formally propose adopting the policy change in https://
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-71
-0
I think it's valuable to document who
Hi,
+1 to decentralizing where possible. Keep in mind Robert and RAT are
a fairly unique podling situation, so this policy change is largely
theoretical, I don't think it will affect many people in practice.
Yoav
On Nov 22, 2007 6:51 AM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Nov 22,
Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy
Discussion to what? I see the RAT set up thread, but there was no
discussion of a general policy change. Robert said that infrastructure
approval should probably rest with the IPMC in general rather than the
mentors
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy
Discussion to what? I see the RAT set up thread, but there was no
discussion of a general policy change. Robert said that
infrastructure
approval should probably rest
On Nov 21, 2007 5:03 PM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy,
I'd like to formally propose adopting the policy change in https://
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-71
[ ] +1 Allow podlings with karma to set up their
See Robert's message earlier in which he asked if he could set up the
RAT project even though he's not a Mentor on RAT.
He's not a Mentor, but he has all the karma anyone would want.
Craig
On Nov 21, 2007, at 7:08 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007 5:03 PM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL
11 matches
Mail list logo
