[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.

2013-04-23 Thread Hitesh Shah
Closing out this vote for the votes monitor to catch. 1.2.1 RC1 was voted on and released quite some time back. -- Hitesh - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: genera

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.

2013-03-12 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> At least >> in Hadoop ecosystem I know of no other project that provides a combined >> bundle for the checksums. > > > Have you looked at the Hadoop releases? > > http://www.us.a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.

2013-03-12 Thread Owen O'Malley
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > At least > in Hadoop ecosystem I know of no other project that provides a combined > bundle for the checksums. Have you looked at the Hadoop releases? http://www.us.apache.org/dist/hadoop/common/hadoop-1.1.2/ -- Owen

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.

2013-03-11 Thread sebb
On 11 March 2013 20:17, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb wrote: > > The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be >> separate files for each hash type. >> Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided. >> > > In what way are they "wrong?" It is a perfe

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.

2013-03-11 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb wrote: > > The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be >> separate files for each hash type. >> Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided. >> > > In what way are they "wrong?" It i

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.

2013-03-11 Thread Owen O'Malley
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb wrote: The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be > separate files for each hash type. > Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided. > In what way are they "wrong?" It is a perfectly well defined output format that is the preferred one

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.

2013-03-10 Thread Mahadev Konar
Thanks for taking a look Seb. Let me mix the issues you mentioned and Ill upload a new tarball. thanks mahadev On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb wrote: > On 11 March 2013 00:24, Mahadev Konar wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Ambari 1.2.1 incubat

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.

2013-03-10 Thread sebb
On 11 March 2013 00:24, Mahadev Konar wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Ambari 1.2.1 incubating. A vote > was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 6+1's with 5 of them > binding. > > mahadev (IPMC, PPMC) > ddas (IPMC, PPMC) > acmurthy (IPMC) >

[VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.

2013-03-10 Thread Mahadev Konar
Hi everyone, This is a call for a vote to release Apache Ambari 1.2.1 incubating. A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 6+1's with 5 of them binding. mahadev (IPMC, PPMC) ddas (IPMC, PPMC) acmurthy (IPMC) jitendra (PPMC) yusaku (PPMC) http://mail-archives.apache.org/