Hello!
The vote has been finished with 4 +1 votes and 0 0 and 0 -1.
Thanks to all who voted:
1. Cos
2. Brane
3. Jan
4. Roman
Here is the link to the thread:
+1 (binding)
rgds
jan i.
On 27 May 2015 at 17:17, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
IPMC,
we are one vote short here and the absence of this release is blocking
Apache
Bigtop 1.0 from getting into RC. Could you please take a look and vote?
Thanks
in advance!
cos
On Mon, May
IPMC,
we are one vote short here and the absence of this release is blocking Apache
Bigtop 1.0 from getting into RC. Could you please take a look and vote? Thanks
in advance!
cos
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 01:14PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
Hello!
The Apache Ignite PPMC has voted to release Apache
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
IPMC,
we are one vote short here and the absence of this release is blocking Apache
Bigtop 1.0 from getting into RC. Could you please take a look and vote? Thanks
in advance!
+1
Thanks,
Roman.
Hello!
The Apache Ignite PPMC has voted to release Apache Ignite 1.1.0-incubating.
The vote was based on the release candidate and thread described below.
We now request the IPMC to vote on this release.
Apache Ignite 1.1.0 release (RC7) has been accepted with 7 votes for (1
binding vote):
1.
On 25.05.2015 12:14, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
Hello!
The Apache Ignite PPMC has voted to release Apache Ignite 1.1.0-incubating.
The vote was based on the release candidate and thread described below.
We now request the IPMC to vote on this release.
Apache Ignite 1.1.0 release (RC7) has been
Understood.
--Yakov
2015-05-25 13:24 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org:
Brane's vote is evidently binding as well.
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 01:14PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
Hello!
The Apache Ignite PPMC has voted to release Apache Ignite
1.1.0-incubating.
The vote was based
Brane's vote is evidently binding as well.
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 01:14PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
Hello!
The Apache Ignite PPMC has voted to release Apache Ignite 1.1.0-incubating.
The vote was based on the release candidate and thread described below.
We now request the IPMC to vote on