Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

2008-04-13 Thread Kevan Miller
Been traveling. Here's my belated +1 --kevan On Apr 6, 2008, at 7:10 PM, ant elder wrote: Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO. This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging repository, a

[RESULT][VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

2008-04-12 Thread ant elder
Passed with +1s from Matthieu, Paul, and me. Thanks for the reviews everyone. ...ant On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO. > > This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release > artif

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

2008-04-11 Thread Kevan Miller
On Apr 11, 2008, at 3:47 AM, ant elder wrote: On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For files without src license headers, I was referring to files like: ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/ impl/model/SDO.mdl ==C:/Tuscany

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

2008-04-11 Thread Matthieu Riou
On 4/9/08, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Should have voted myself, so +1. > > Anyone else able to review and vote on this? No blockers, +1 from me. Matthieu ...ant > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please vote to approve the 1.1 rele

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

2008-04-11 Thread ant elder
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:35 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/04/2008, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Apr 10, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > > > > > > The files that have this license are listed in the LICENSE [1] file > > > (search for "Apache Tuscany

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

2008-04-11 Thread ant elder
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For files without src license headers, I was referring to files like: > > > > ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/impl/model/SDO.mdl > > > ==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-i

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

2008-04-10 Thread sebb
On 11/04/2008, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 10, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > > > The files that have this license are listed in the LICENSE [1] file > > (search for "Apache Tuscany SDO for Java Subcomponents") and I also > > see a mention of osoa.org in the NO

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

2008-04-10 Thread Kevan Miller
On Apr 10, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: The files that have this license are listed in the LICENSE [1] file (search for "Apache Tuscany SDO for Java Subcomponents") and I also see a mention of osoa.org in the NOTICE [2]. Is this what you were looking for ? For files without src l

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

2008-04-10 Thread Luciano Resende
The files that have this license are listed in the LICENSE [1] file (search for "Apache Tuscany SDO for Java Subcomponents") and I also see a mention of osoa.org in the NOTICE [2]. Is this what you were looking for ? [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sdo/1.1-RC3/LI

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

2008-04-10 Thread Kevan Miller
Hi Ant, Apologies for the slow review. Can you comment on the src files that don't have src license headers? I also note that the commonj src files contain the following copyright statement. I would expect to find it in the base NOTICE file as well as any jar files containing commonj class

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

2008-04-10 Thread Paul Fremantle
+1 from me. Paul On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should have voted myself, so +1. > > Anyone else able to review and vote on this? > >...ant > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please vote to approve the

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

2008-04-09 Thread ant elder
Should have voted myself, so +1. Anyone else able to review and vote on this? ...ant On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO. > > This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release > artif

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

2008-04-06 Thread sebb
On 07/04/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO. > > This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release > artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging > repository, and RAT report are at: > http:

[VOTE] Approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO

2008-04-06 Thread ant elder
Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO. This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging repository, and RAT report are at: http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a The tag for the