Hi Folks,
OK, this VOTE has passed with the following tallies including 6 IPMC member
+1s:
+1s:
Chris Mattmann*
Julien Nioche*
Lewis John McGibbney
Henry Saputra
Andrew Hart
Ioannis Canellos
Enis Söztutar*
Marcel Offermans*
Chris Douglas*
Marvin Humphrey*
* - indicates IPMC
I'll go ahead and
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
It doesn't require it, so maybe it's fine to leave out Hadoop.
Even if it did, it would likely be a good idea not to refer to it by
name in the resolution.
+1 Agreed.
I spent some time poking through the mailing
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:23:14AM -0800, Chris Douglas wrote:
I spent some time poking through the mailing lists, JIRA, and some
familiar corners of the source code. The project seems to be in great
shape, particularly w.r.t. the Incubator's graduation criteria. It's
released a couple times,
On Dec 18, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I think the Board might have an issue with the 'purpose' of the
project (I would if I was in the Board). The formulation
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation
First and foremost, thank you for providing comments, opinions and
insight on how we can all make Gora a better project @ ASF.
At this stage a change to either documentation or an opinion regarding
Apache Gora is fine, however I propose that as a community we were
should address the obvious
Hey Marcel,
Thanks for your feedback. Comments below:
On Dec 18, 2011, at 3:28 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
On Dec 18, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I think the Board might have an issue with the 'purpose' of the
project
On Dec 18, 2011, at 18:15 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Dec 18, 2011, at 3:28 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
On Dec 18, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I think the Board might have an issue with the 'purpose' of the
Hey Marcel,
On Dec 18, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
In my view, ORM is middeware, but not all middleware is ORM. That's why I see
it as an extension. More precise, you do state it's not just middleware, but
persistence, storage and retrieval middleware, but even that in my
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote on Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:15:28 -0800:
On Dec 18, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
and, IF it somehow requires Hadoop (see question above) that
definition should probably be extended with something like for
Hadoop.
It doesn't require it, so maybe
Hey Guys,
The Gora community has VOTEd to graduate from the Incubator.
DISCUSS thread here: http://s.apache.org/fm
VOTE thread here: http://s.apache.org/AbC
RESULT thread here: http://s.apache.org/6Wz
In our community VOTE above, 3 IPMC members (myself, Julien
and Enis) VOTEd +1.
The
I think the Board might have an issue with the 'purpose' of the
project (I would if I was in the Board). The formulation
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
maintenance of open-source software related to persistence, storage,
and retrieval middleware for relational and
Hi Niclas,
On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I think the Board might have an issue with the 'purpose' of the
project (I would if I was in the Board). The formulation
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
maintenance of open-source software related
Niclas Hedhman wrote on Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:16:46 +0800:
is very vague and encompassing. When read, it could mean anything. I
recommend a more narrow definition, or risk the Board to reject it.
Or, you know, email board@ and ask.
13 matches
Mail list logo
