Hello!
Ted Husted wrote:
... Once the IP is cleared, we can move it to the MyFaces area, and
deal with things like new committers as MyFaces project issues.
We faxed the ICLAs and CCLA to the ASF last Wednesday. Additionally we
sent them per snail mail as a precaution.
Is there anything else
On 9/6/05, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I didn't argument against using the incubator infrastructure.
Nobody seemed too interested here, though (in contradiction to the
MyFaces community, who was very interested), that's why Ted probably
thought about going through the
On 9/5/05, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/6/05, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I didn't argument against using the incubator infrastructure.
Nobody seemed too interested here, though (in contradiction to the
MyFaces community, who was very interested), that's
Ok,
I think we can close this vote out - what do you say?
Next step is then to request accounts, right?
regards,
Martin
On 8/31/05, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since a software grant is involved, we do need to incubate the code. So, we
are at the step where
The Incubator PMC MAY
On 8/31/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, as the rules stand right now, if you have a PMC that has voted
to accept the project then you don't even need a vote here; you're
simply good to go.
Yeah, I was surprised too but that's the rules as they are now.
Well, I didn't argument against using the incubator infrastructure.
Nobody seemed too interested here, though (in contradiction to the
MyFaces community, who was very interested), that's why Ted probably
thought about going through the MyFaces sandbox directly as a code
grant is already in place
I would like to call for a vote of the Incubator PMC on the MyFaces proposal
to incubate the Tobago codebase, and if successful, to create a Tobago
subproject within the MyFaces project.
The proposal was first circulated to general@ in message #5937, and is
currently represented on the
Thanks Ted,
well just a note, the MyFaces PMC has already voted for Tobago.
-Matthias
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 09:51 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
I would like to call for a vote of the Incubator PMC on the MyFaces proposal
to incubate the Tobago codebase, and if successful, to create a Tobago
Well,
as Cliff has just pointed out, that should not be enough, at least in
the future.
regards,
Martin
On 8/31/05, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Ted,
well just a note, the MyFaces PMC has already voted for Tobago.
-Matthias
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 09:51 -0400,
doh!
I really have to read all emails first, before writing back...
Sorry for bothering, and thanks Martin for pointing this out to me ...
:-)
-Matthias
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 21:16 +0200, Martin Marinschek wrote:
Well,
as Cliff has just pointed out, that should not be enough, at least in
However, as the rules stand right now, if you have a PMC that has voted
to accept the project then you don't even need a vote here; you're
simply good to go.
Yeah, I was surprised too but that's the rules as they are now.
Sanjiva.
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 21:16 +0200, Martin Marinschek wrote:
Yes, but don't take my personal thoughts/proposals to be policy.
Matthias is right that the current policy does not require an
Incubator PMC vote.
Cliff
On 8/31/05, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well,
as Cliff has just pointed out, that should not be enough, at least in
the
Ok...
so Ted, are we still voting for informative reasons only?
regards,
Martin
On 8/31/05, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but don't take my personal thoughts/proposals to be policy.
Matthias is right that the current policy does not require an
Incubator PMC vote.
Cliff
Since a software grant is involved, we do need to incubate the code. So, we
are at the step where
The Incubator PMC MAY immediately accept the Candidate, or may (at the
discretion of the Incubator PMC) require a successful VOTE by the Incubator
PMC.
If no one responds negatively to the VOTE
14 matches
Mail list logo
