Re: [VOTE] Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0 rc0

Thanks! On 12/8/18 8:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Also this may help [1] along with the other link I’ve sent. Thanks, Justin 1. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorReleaseChecklist - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0 rc0

Hi, Also this may help [1] along with the other link I’ve sent. Thanks, Justin 1. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorReleaseChecklist - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [VOTE] Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0 rc0

Hi, > I would have confidently thought that bundled software's copyright statements > always had a place in NOTICE. Also, a surprise to me that we want all > licenses in LICENSE. Will try to pick these up for the next release. I take a look at it when done of you want, just ping me. Thanks,

Re: [VOTE] Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0 rc0

I guess I just need to accept that I'll never have a firm grasp on L construction. I'm still a bit befuddled. Thanks for taking the time to explain, Justin. I would have confidently thought that bundled software's copyright statements always had a place in NOTICE. Also, a surprise to me that

[RESULT] [VOTE] Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0 rc0

for (at least) the customary 72hours -- 2018/12/06 2100 GMT. Please note the two IPMC binding votes already from myself and Jitendra. - Josh Forwarded Message Subject: [VOTE] Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0 rc0 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:33:19 -0500 From: Josh Elser To: d

Re: [VOTE] Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0 rc0

Hi, > Are we looking at different things, Justin? The NOTICE file in the directory > you mention only has copyright information for bundled software (and text to > help us know to what product that copyright statement applies). That is not the purpose of NOTICE. > Are you expecting a more

Re: [VOTE] Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0 rc0

Thanks for the quick vote, Justin! On 12/4/18 2:14 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, +1 binding but there probably an issue you’ll need to look into before ether net release. I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE correct - All ASF

Re: [VOTE] Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0 rc0

Hi, +1 binding but there probably an issue you’ll need to look into before ether net release. I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE correct - All ASF files have ASF header - No binary files - Can compile from source The LICENSE

Re: [VOTE] Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0 rc0

tendra. > > - Josh > > ---- Forwarded Message > Subject: [VOTE] Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0 rc0 > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:33:19 -0500 > From: Josh Elser > To: d...@ratis.incubator.apache.org > > Hi, > > Please on the following as Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0: > &g

[VOTE] Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0 rc0

myself and Jitendra. - Josh Forwarded Message Subject: [VOTE] Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0 rc0 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:33:19 -0500 From: Josh Elser To: d...@ratis.incubator.apache.org Hi, Please on the following as Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0: The release artifact (in source form only