Hi,
The vote to release Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.10.1 has passed with 3 +1
binding votes.
binding votes:
- Christofer Dutz
- Willem Jiang
- Julian Feinauer
Vote thread:
Hi,
my vote is +1 (binding).
I checked:
- Downloaded staged artefacts and checked signature and hash
- Incubating in name
- License and Notice file are fine
- README and RELEASE_NOTES are fine
- No unexpected binaries in source release
- Builds sucessfull on macOS 10.15.5
Great Job Team!
Hi,
> It not a requirement but many project do it so they can link to it from
their download page.
Yes, and I in favor of this view.
Best,
---
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Justin Mclean 于2020年8月20日周四 上午10:22写道：
> Hi,
Hi,
> I checked many projects on [1], few projects put the readme file
> separated with the source-release file.
It not a requirement but many project do it so they can link to it from their
download page. People often want to look at the README before downloading and
installing the software.
Hi,
I checked many projects on [1], few projects put the readme file
separated with the source-release file.
I think the Apache release guideline does not require that.
I agree that an easy-touched README file helps the community
(especially who are not familiar with the project) knowing the
I wouldn't say they have to be there ...
but I personally do like projects that have them there: A README as well as a
RELEASE_NOTES.
Chris
Am 19.08.20, 16:17 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" :
Hi,
> I just have a quick question about the README files. Why do we put them
Hi,
> I just have a quick question about the README files. Why do we put them
into the release directory?
Thanks, Willem. Yes, you are right, we do not need to put the README files
to the SVN
(But they still need to be included in our source-release files)...
We will fix our release process to
+1 （binding）
I just have a quick question about the README files. Why do we put
them into the release directory?
I checked：
Verified the signed the key and hash code.
Incubating in the release kit name.
License and Notice files are good to me.
The maven staging repo looks good.
Git repo
Hi,
@Chris, thanks for your detailed checking and continuous help to IoTDB.
We will fix all the issues you mentioned in the next release version.
We look forward to more votes from IPMCs for this release. :D.
Best,
---
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua
Hi all,
TL/DR:
+1 binding
Longer version:
I started evaluating. As usual the IoTDB release candidate is in very good
shape.
Here some super minor things I noticed:
- It seems the ".plan" templates in
server/src/assembly/resources/tools/logVisualize/plans support comments, then
they should
Hi IPMCs,
We are still looking forward to getting votes from you...
Many thanks!
Best,
---
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Xiangdong Huang 于2020年8月14日周五 上午9:59写道：
> Hello all,
>
> This is a call for vote to release
Hello all,
This is a call for vote to release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) version
0.10.1, which is a bug-fix version of 0.10.0.
The Apache IoTDB community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache
IoTDB (Incubating) version 0.10.1 (with 12 +1 votes).
We now kindly request the
12 matches
Mail list logo
