Hi,
> We tried very hard to only use min-headers in cases where they were
> config/property/test/simple script type files (often used by tooling).
Which according to [1] is not an appropriate use, you also have source files
with the short header. I suggest you check with legal if this is OK.
Hi Justin,
Given the documented rationale of where we use the mini-header
(https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md#project-asf-License-header-policy)
are there specific files (types) or specific files themselves where you
believe they are
Justin Mclean wrote on 06/09/2019 09:50:12 AM:
>
> Sorry to be clearer re the short header issue I suggest you read
> [1]. It may be used with mages, minified JavaScript or PDFs, that’s
> not the case where it’s been used in your releases and this has been
> pointed out several times. If there
Hi,
Sorry to be clearer re the short header issue I suggest you read [1]. It may be
used with mages, minified JavaScript or PDFs, that’s not the case where it’s
been used in your releases and this has been pointed out several times. If
there are other cases where you have confirmed with
> > We've also discussed the use of "short licenses" [5] and we document our
> use of the short licenses
>
> Which I see was some time ago but this keeps happening in your releases.
>
You are correct that we have an outstanding item to tighten our automated
checks inline with the project's
Hi,
> For several of the issues you noted, I opened github defects [1-4] against
> the relevant repos so that we will address them before the next release of
> the corresponding artifacts.
Thanks for that.
> We've also discussed the use of "short licenses" [5] and we document our use
> of
For several of the issues you noted, I opened github defects [1-4] against the
relevant repos so that we will address them before the next release of the
corresponding artifacts. We've also discussed the use of "short licenses" [5]
and we document our use of the short licenses and license
Thank you Justin for the feedback. I opened several defects to address all the
points you've raised.
For reference:
- https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-go/issues/87
- https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-go/issues/86
-
The voting is now closed. The vote has passed.
3 (+1 binding) from Bertrand Delacretaz, Justin Mclean, Matt Sicker
0 (-1 binding)
The vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3bc8d6be4a9c4c7bce6538846a956d379e12a412647cf357521c6f8d@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
Many thanks to
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked all releases:
- incubating in artefact names
- signatures and hashes fine
- NOTICE and LICENSE fine in most cases (but see below)
- Some files have incorrect headers (e.g [1]) or missing headers [2]. This has
been brought up before in previous releases.
- No
Dear IPMC Members,
The Apache OpenWhisk community has voted to release version
1.13.0-incubating of the Apache OpenWhisk Runtimes which comprise the
following 9 project modules with artifacts built from the Git repositories
and commit IDs listed below.
Two binding +1 votes from mentors Matt
11 matches
Mail list logo
