[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC6

2023-02-13 Thread Huajie Wang
Hello Incubator Community, I'm cancelling this vote: https://lists.apache.org/thread/zz7h1tmkrnbx06lnzodtbdpwflpvw9mr due to licenses issues. I'll fix them and start a new vote process. Thanks a lot for all your help. Best, Huajie Wang

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC6

2023-02-13 Thread Huajie Wang
thanks for your clarification, this vote is closed, We will fix these issues and start a new vote process. Best, Huajie Wang kezhenxu94 于2023年2月13日周一 15:52写道: > It depends, if you wrote the codes of `AssertUtils.scala` from scratch > without referencing > the Spring's Assert class, you can

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC6

2023-02-12 Thread kezhenxu94
It depends, if you wrote the codes of `AssertUtils.scala` from scratch without referencing the Spring's Assert class, you can definitely said it's your own work and your own IP, but if you copied the content from Spring's, and converted it into Scala, even with some modifications, I still consid

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC6

2023-02-12 Thread Huajie Wang
Thanks for your review and feedback, we will fix this issue, but I have a question: As we all know, spring is developed in java language, while Streampark's AssertUtils.scala[1] is developed in scala. As you can see, the methods and logic in it are very simple. Even if the logic and method names i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC6

2023-02-12 Thread kezhenxu94
Hi, -1 (binding), you cannot change the license header of a third-party's file[1] as you mentioned in LICENSE it's from Spring team[2]. [1] streampark-common/src/main/scala/org/apache/streampark/common/util/AssertUtils.scala [2] https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework > On Feb 10, 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC6

2023-02-12 Thread Huajie Wang
hi Kent Yao: The current download page[1] is just a template, all links are empty links, and there is no content about the release of version 2.0, The previously failed RCs users will download and use. so deleted, I don't konw if this will be the reason for block the release. [1] https://stream

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC6

2023-02-12 Thread 陈卓宇
+1 (non-binding): I checked: 1. All download links are valid 2.The source and distribution packages already exist 3. Checksum and signature are OK 4. LICENSE and NOTICE are exist and NOTICE file year is ok 5. Build successfully on ubuntu22.04 Kent Yao 于2023年2月13日周一 11:46写道:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC6

2023-02-12 Thread Kent Yao
Hi (-1, non-binding): There is a spoiler for 2.0.0 on your download page[1], you shall remove it as it's not been approved yet. The previously failed RCs, e.g. [2] have been deleted, which makes it difficult for others to track the history of the 2.0.0 voting progress. Kent Yao [1] https://s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC6

2023-02-12 Thread Qingrong wang
+1 (non-binding): I checked: 1. All download links are valid 2.The source and distribution packages already exist 3. Checksum and signature are OK 4. LICENSE and NOTICE are exist and NOTICE file year is ok 5. Build successfully on ubuntu22.04 Huajie Wang 于2023年2月10日周五 17:46写道

[VOTE] Release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) 2.0.0-RC6

2023-02-10 Thread Huajie Wang
Hello Incubator Community: This is a call for a vote to release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) version 2.0.0-RC6 The Apache StreamPark community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache StreamPark(Incubating) version 2.0.0-RC6 We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review a