[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

Hi all, this vote passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Justin Mclean Jean-Baptiste Onofré Tom Barber No -1s. I will complete the release process. Thanks for your vote. Regards JB On 02/15/2016 10:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi all, I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

No problem sweet cheeks On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Awesome, thanks Tom ! > > Regards > JB > > > On 03/04/2016 10:42 AM, Tom Barber wrote: > >> +1 Binding >> >> Checked and built. Headers look good. License, Notice and Disclaimer look >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

Awesome, thanks Tom ! Regards JB On 03/04/2016 10:42 AM, Tom Barber wrote: +1 Binding Checked and built. Headers look good. License, Notice and Disclaimer look good. Tom On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Gently reminder: we need at lest one

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

+1 Binding Checked and built. Headers look good. License, Notice and Disclaimer look good. Tom On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Gently reminder: we need at lest one more IPMC vote to accept the release. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > > On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

Gently reminder: we need at lest one more IPMC vote to accept the release. Thanks ! Regards JB On 02/15/2016 10:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi all, I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote (take 4, new tentative fixing NOTICE file). A vote was held on developer

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

+1 (binding) Regards JB On 02/15/2016 10:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi all, I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote (take 4, new tentative fixing NOTICE file). A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with +1s. Vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

Hi, > Normally we should only have dual licensed GPL/CDDL unless I have missed > something. Note that most of the GPL/CDDL dual licensed files have this: If you wish your version of this file to be governed by only the CDDL or only the GPL Version 2, indicate your decision by adding

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

> On 16 févr. 2016, at 07:10, Justin Mclean wrote: > > I got this error when compiling - looks like a path may be wrong: > [INFO] Apache Unomi :: Distribution Package ... FAILURE [ 0.568 > s] > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

Hi Justin, Thank you so much for this detailed testing and report. Normally we should only have dual licensed GPL/CDDL unless I have missed something. We are working on a plugin legal-maven-plugin that actually does recursively go down into embedded JARs to make sure we collect everything but

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

HI, > thanks for this awesome review ! No problem, binaries with than many jars are hard to get right. Hopefully none of the jars with jars inside than have more jars inside them :-) I did’t take a huge amount of care so made of made a mistake or two - just trying to find the obvious issues.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

Hi Justin, thanks for this awesome review ! We gonna improve with your comments. Thanks again, Regards JB On 02/16/2016 07:10 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, +1 binding I checked: - incubating in file name - hashes and signatures good - DISCLAIMER exits - Source LICENSE good (although the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - incubating in file name - hashes and signatures good - DISCLAIMER exits - Source LICENSE good (although the short form of the license is prefered) [1] - Source NOICE has a little bit of extra info in it - there's no need to mention MIT software [1] - No unexpected

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 2)

HI, Sorry I posted to the wrong vote thread I’ll repost to the correct one. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 2)

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - incubating in file name - hashes and signatures good - DISCLAIMER exits - Source LICENSE good (although the short form of the license is prefered) [1] - Source NOICE has a little bit of extra info in it - there's no need to mention MIT software [1] - No unexpected

[VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)

Hi all, I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote (take 4, new tentative fixing NOTICE file). A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with +1s. Vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 2)

Hi Justin, thanks for the feedback. For the binary, we gonna fix that. For the NOTICE, as said on another thread, honestly, it's very difficult to know what to include or not. Serge generated the NOTICE file (note that the NOTICE generated is not the same in binary and source distributions)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 2)

HI, > For the NOTICE, as said on another thread, honestly, it's very difficult to > know what to include or not. Just follow the how to [1] and get a couple of people to review. Your mentors should be able to help as well. What matters is what is bundled and how those bundled bits are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 2)

Hi Justin, thanks for the guidance. You are right, it's our role as mentors to help, I missed the binaries in the src distribution (my bad), but the NOTICE looked good to me (in regards of the dependencies usage in assembly and Maven pom). Thanks ! Regards JB On 01/27/2016 05:52 AM, Justin

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 2)

As found by Justin, the src distribution and NOTICE should be updated. I will fix that and re-cut a release. Thanks, Regards JB On 01/26/2016 02:46 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi all, I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote (take 2, new tentative fixing src

[VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 2)

Hi all, I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote (take 2, new tentative fixing src distributions and NOTICE file). A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with +1s. Vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 2)

Hi, Sorry but it’s -1 binding as there are unexpected binary files in the source release. There are a few other things that need to be fixed but they wouldn’t be blockers (IMO) for this release. I checked: - name includes incubating - signatures all good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is OK

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

Hello Niall (and Daniel), Thanks for spending time on checking this. Wow that email from Roy seemed quite aggressive in tone, but I have heard this before and should have remembered it. I also feel partly responsible for this because I setup the initial build project and didn’t do this

[VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

Hi all, I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote. A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 7 +1s. Vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201512.mbox/%3c5679aace.1080...@nanthrax.net%3E Result thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

On 12/28/2015 08:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > The unomi-1.0.0-incubating.tar.gz (or zip) is the unomi distribution. > > It assembles all "binaries" and provide ready to run runtime. > > Do you want a description of each artifact ? I can prepare that if it > helps. I'd prefer what other

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

My bad, I forgot to include unomi--src.[tar.gz|zip] artifact as I do for other project. Anyway, the source are on git based on the tag: https://github.com/apache/incubator-unomi/tree/unomi-root-1.0.0-incubating (I paste github mirror there as it's easier to read). Let see what the others

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

Thanks Jean-Baptiste, howeverthere are no less than 215 java binaries in that RC - I couldn't possibly vote +1 on something I don't know what is, and I'm not about to go reverse engineer it to find out. Other than that it seems okay, but consider this a tentative -1. With regards, Daniel.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

On 12/28/2015 07:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi all, > > I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote. > > A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 7 +1s. > > Vote thread: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

Hi Daniel, sorry, it's on the staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1002/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/ I will upload to dist.apache.org when the release vote will pass. Regards JB On 12/28/2015 07:31 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 12/28/2015

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

The unomi-1.0.0-incubating.tar.gz (or zip) is the unomi distribution. It assembles all "binaries" and provide ready to run runtime. Do you want a description of each artifact ? I can prepare that if it helps. Regards JB On 12/28/2015 07:48 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: Thanks Jean-Baptiste,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > My bad, I forgot to include unomi--src.[tar.gz|zip] artifact as I do > for other project. > > Anyway, the source are on git based on the tag: > >

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

Fair enough, I cancel this vote to prepare a new release containing src distro. Regards JB On 12/28/2015 09:28 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: My bad, I forgot to include unomi--src.[tar.gz|zip] artifact as I do

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

Hi Serge, On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 5:58 PM Serge Huber wrote: > Hello Niall (and Daniel), > > Thanks for spending time on checking this. Wow that email from Roy seemed > quite aggressive in tone, but I have heard this before and should have > remembered it. I also feel partly

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

Hi, You might want to double check LICENSE and NOTICE files as well before calling for another vote. From a quick look I see Apache, MIT, BSD license software mentioned in the NOTICE when it should not be. Please see [1][2][3]. Also the second bit about NOTICE contents bubbling up would also

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

Hi, You might also want to look at [1]. From a quick look I think you are also also missing a disclaimer. Thanks, Justin 1. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

Hi John, > Le 29 déc. 2015 à 00:24, John D. Ament a écrit : > > Hi Serge, > >> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 5:58 PM Serge Huber wrote: >> >> Hello Niall (and Daniel), >> >> Thanks for spending time on checking this. Wow that email from Roy seemed >> quite