Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 07:39, William Guo wrote: > that means if we cannot have category X dependencies in our source release, > but for category B, since we don't bundled in our source release, so it is > fine. That’s correct. > > Correct me if I am wrong. > > Thanks, >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

that means if we cannot have category X dependencies in our source release, but for category B, since we don't bundled in our source release, so it is fine. Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks, William On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:58 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > On 13 April 2018 at

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

On 13 April 2018 at 03:37, Willem Jiang wrote: > Hi Matt, > > I just have different idea about your your explanation. > > If my code has the compile dependency of the JSON library, as the JSON > library code is not bundled in the source code. > I don't think we should

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

Hi Matt, I just have different idea about your your explanation. If my code has the compile dependency of the JSON library, as the JSON library code is not bundled in the source code. I don't think we should add the License of JSON library into my License file. If we use the LGPL license jar

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

Thanks Justin and Matt, then we'll clean up the unbundled dependencies' licenses for our source release. Thanks, Lionel On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > On 12 April 2018 at 22:43, Lionel Liu wrote: > > > > 2. Only things that are

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

On 12 April 2018 at 22:43, Lionel Liu wrote: > > 2. Only things that are actually bundled in the release should be mentioned > in LICENSE. [3][4] > > To my understanding, as a source release, all the dependencies are bundled > when it is built. > The dependencies are not

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

Hi, > I reviewed this JSON license we've mentioned in license file: (The JSON > License) JSON in Java (org.json:json:20140107 - > https://github.com/douglascrockford/JSON-java > ) > It is transitive dependency from

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

Hi Justin, Thanks a lot for your review, I have some questions: 1. The source LICENSE mentions: - JSON licensed software - this is category X and can’t be dependancy even if it is not included in the source release. [1] - CDDL and EPL license software there are category B and cannot be included

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

Thanks for your inputs. ok, we will go through and check our license. Thanks, William On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:53 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > On 12 April 2018 at 18:49, Justin Mclean wrote: > > > The source LICENSE mentions: > > - JSON licensed

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

On 12 April 2018 at 18:49, Justin Mclean wrote: > The source LICENSE mentions: > - JSON licensed software - this is category X and can’t be dependancy even > if it is not included in the source release. [1] > - CDDL and EPL license software there are category B and

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

Hi Dave, For those GPL+CDDL dependencies, we are not packaging them in source release. Thanks, William On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:31 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Apr 9, 2018, at 10:53 PM, William Guo wrote: > > +1 > > > rat passed. > > sha1 checked. >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

Hi, -1 binding The source LICENSE mentions: - JSON licensed software - this is category X and can’t be dependancy even if it is not included in the source release. [1] - CDDL and EPL license software there are category B and cannot be included in a source release. [2] Only things that are

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

> On Apr 9, 2018, at 10:53 PM, William Guo wrote: > > +1 > > > rat passed. > > sha1 checked. > > all GPL are dual licensed either CDDL or 'Apache License version 2.0’ Please see https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html Is

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

hi guys, We need your help to verify our release, Could you please spend some time to vote for us if you are free at the moment. Thanks, William On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:07 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > * Signatures ok > * Disclaimer, notice, license ok > - As an aside, I

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

* Signatures ok * Disclaimer, notice, license ok - As an aside, I like the formatting used in the license file. * Not exactly sure why you distribute the KEYS file with your sources, but it's not a problem. Keys inside the artifact can't be used to verify the artifact. * Rat check ok *

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

+1 rat passed. sha1 checked. all GPL are dual licensed either CDDL or 'Apache License version 2.0' Checked all suspicious license, looks good. Thanks, William On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Lionel Liu wrote: > Hi all, > The Apache Griffin community has

[VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

Hi all, The Apache Griffin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Griffin 0.2.0-rc3. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release candidate. Apache Griffin is data quality service for modern data system, it