Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.2.0-beta-incubating

2015-07-15 Thread amareshwarisr .
> > And I assume you ‘re not using the GPL license version :-) > > Yes > > AFAIK, I have verified all the content wrt licenses and the NOTICE is > fine. > > > From a quick look it seems to me that is not the case as it listing > licences rather than what’s required but I'll take your word for it.

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.2.0-beta-incubating

2015-07-15 Thread Amareshwari Sriramdasu
Hi all, The vote is now closed and passed with 5 +1 votes (4 binding), no -1 votes and no 0 votes. We now have the required number of positive binding votes and will therefore proceed with publishing this release. Thank you all for voting. Binding votes : +1 Amareshwari Sriramadasu +1 Justin Mcl

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.2.0-beta-incubating

2015-07-15 Thread amareshwarisr .
I'm closing the vote as 72 hours passed and required number of votes are received. Closing it on behalf of Jaideep as he is OOO. Thanks all for taking time to vote. On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Those are files required for binary distribution LICENSE files.

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.2.0-beta-incubating

2015-07-15 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Those are files required for binary distribution LICENSE files. Some of > the libraries included in binary distribution are dual licensed along with > GPL. And I assume you ‘re not using the GPL license version :-) > AFAIK, I have verified all the content wrt licenses and the NOTICE is fi

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.2.0-beta-incubating

2015-07-15 Thread amareshwarisr .
Thanks Justin for bringing up issues on the candidate. Responses in-line. > > Minor issues: > - Any reason why are these file included in the source release? > apache-lens-2.2.0-beta-incubating/bin-dist-files/LICENSE-GPLv3 > apache-lens-2.2.0-beta-incubating/bin-dist-files/LICENSE-

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.2.0-beta-incubating

2015-07-14 Thread Chris Douglas
+1 (binding) Verified checksum, signature on src/bin. Built package target from source. NOTICE/LICENSE/DISCLAIMER present, but I only did a cursory check of the dependencies. The DEPENDENCIES file at the top level of the source tarball is empty. -C On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Jaideep Dhok

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.2.0-beta-incubating

2015-07-13 Thread Sharad Agarwal
+1 (binding) On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Jaideep Dhok wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is the call for vote for the following RC to be released as official > Apache Lens 2.2.0-beta-incubating release. This is our third release. > > Apache Lens provides an Unified Analytics interface. Lens

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.2.0-beta-incubating

2015-07-13 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding For the source release I checked: - release contains incubating - signatures and hashes correct - DISCLAIMER exits - LICENSE and NOTICE correct - All source files have Apache headers - No unexpected binaries in release - Can compile from source Minor issues: - Any reason why are t

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.2.0-beta-incubating

2015-07-12 Thread Amareshwari Sriramdasu
+1 (binding). Recasting my vote from dev list. Thanks Amareshwari On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Jaideep Dhok wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is the call for vote for the following RC to be released as official > Apache Lens 2.2.0-beta-incubating release. This is our third release. > > Apa

[VOTE] Release of Apache Lens 2.2.0-beta-incubating

2015-07-11 Thread Jaideep Dhok
Hello everyone, This is the call for vote for the following RC to be released as official Apache Lens 2.2.0-beta-incubating release. This is our third release. Apache Lens provides an Unified Analytics interface. Lens aims to cut the Data Analytics silos by providing a single view of data across