+1
On Apr 19, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'm not all to familiar with what the next steps should be.
Update the status page, move the project on the projects index (probably
retired is correct, rather than dormant) to reflect the change.
I assume the wsrp4j mailing list
On 04/20/2010 01:44 AM, David Crossley wrote:
Ate Douma wrote:
What exactly is the standard procedure for a terminated podling, I can't
really find anything on that on the incubator website.
There ain't no exactlies.
Searching for the term Retire has better results. However as far
as i
The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate [WSRP4J]
And I further understand that the intent is to build a new codebase to
implement WSRP 2.0 within the Portals project.
+1
--- Noel
I'm not all to familiar with what the next steps should be.
Update the status page, move the project on the projects index (probably
retired is correct, rather than dormant) to reflect the change.
I assume the wsrp4j mailing list (-dev and -user) should be closed
+1
the svn project under
Ate Douma wrote:
What exactly is the standard procedure for a terminated podling, I can't
really find anything on that on the incubator website.
There ain't no exactlies.
Searching for the term Retire has better results. However as far
as i recall not much actual docs. Searching the mail
+1
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
+1
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the podling
+1, terminate WSRP4J
Carsten
Ate Douma wrote
The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the podling
due to lack of interest to continue the project.
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to ratify
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
[X ] +1, terminate WSRP4J
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
+1
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:10 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
...ant
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the
+1
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the podling due
to lack of interest to continue the project.
I would like to call the
+1
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the podling due
to lack of interest to continue the project.
I would like to call the
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the podling due
to lack of interest to continue the project.
I would like to call the Incubator
The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the
podling due to lack of interest to continue the project.
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to ratify this decision. Please vote on
terminating the WSRP4J
+1
Ralph
On Apr 13, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the podling due to
lack of interest to continue the project.
I would like to call the Incubator PMC
14 matches
Mail list logo
