On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...It takes about two minutes to make a JIRA. If
the contributor can't spare those two minutes, how are they having time to
make a patch at all?...
...Perhaps this is because I'm accustomed, at both my day job and
- Original Message
From: Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thu, September 16, 2010 7:40:22 AM
Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
...It takes
- Original Message
From: David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 7:33:45 PM
Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 04:22 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
FWIW, what Subversion uses:
http
This seems a very workable approach - going through Jira for everything
is too much work on the part of the contributer.
On the one hand, I want to stand off and let any community make its own way
within the light constraints of the license policy. On the other hand, I am
honestly mystified
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 04:22 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
FWIW, what Subversion uses:
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/community-guide.html#patches
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/community-guide.html#patch-manager
Briefly, all patches go to dev@, and only
On Sep 15, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 7:33:45 PM
Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 04:22 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote
- Original Message
From: Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 8:05:01 PM
Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
On Sep 15, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 19:41 -0400, Benson Margulies wrote:
This seems a very workable approach - going through Jira for everything
is too much work on the part of the contributer.
On the one hand, I want to stand off and let any community make its own way
within the light
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
All patches should be attached to JIRAs with the 'grant' checkbox checked.
Only if they are large do you then have to contemplate asking for a CLA and
going through the clearance process. Or so I understand it.
What is the offical process for accepting patches from non-comitters in
a podling ? Is it enough to insist that contributors that are not
committers have a CLA on file or do I also have to make them file each
patch in jira ?
David
All patches should be attached to JIRAs with the 'grant' checkbox checked.
Only if they are large do you then have to contemplate asking for a CLA and
going through the clearance process. Or so I understand it.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:55 PM, David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com wrote:
What is
David,
Yes, current practice is exactly what Benson outlined.
thanks,
dims
On 09/13/2010 08:58 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
All patches should be attached to JIRAs with the 'grant' checkbox checked.
Only if they are large do you then have to contemplate asking for a CLA and
going through the
So each patch /must/ go via JIRA and get some checkbox filled?
Seriously?
1. Over at Subversion, the practice has been to just say thankyou and
commit the patches. A few times, with large-scale contributions (eg:
someone sent us an SQL backend), we have required filing an ICLA first
--- but that
...@daniel.shahaf.name
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, September 13, 2010 9:43:09 PM
Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
So each patch /must/ go via JIRA and get some checkbox filled?
Seriously?
1. Over at Subversion, the practice has been to just say thankyou and
commit
it is not a good thing.
- Original Message
From: Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, September 13, 2010 9:43:09 PM
Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
So each patch /must/ go via JIRA and get some checkbox filled
email to a committer who commits it is not a good thing.
- Original Message
From: Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, September 13, 2010 9:43:09 PM
Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
So each patch /must/ go via JIRA
Benson Margulies wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 22:03:12 -0400:
However, I thank Joe for pointing out that I was careful to avoid stating a
requirement when I didn't know that one existed.
Thanks for clarifying. To summarize, having all patches go via JIRA is
one possible way of working, but
, September 13, 2010 9:43:09 PM
Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
So each patch /must/ go via JIRA and get some checkbox filled?
Seriously?
1. Over at Subversion, the practice has been to just say thankyou and
commit the patches. A few times, with large-scale contributions
18 matches
Mail list logo
