On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:34 +0200, "Bernd Fondermann"
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 20:00, Donald Whytock wrote:
>> > What happens to a dormant podling? Are its files still accessible,
>> > and does its licensing still apply?
>>
>> I'd
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> I know that it is early (as in the earliest that the meeting could possibly
>> happen), but we're late. BeanValidation, Bluesky, Isis, and Wave are all
>> missing from the Wiki.
>
> Blu
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:34 +0200, "Bernd Fondermann"
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 20:00, Donald Whytock wrote:
> > What happens to a dormant podling? Are its files still accessible,
> > and does its licensing still apply?
>
> I'd guess that the files remain accessible. However...
> Please
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 20:00, Donald Whytock wrote:
> What happens to a dormant podling? Are its files still accessible,
> and does its licensing still apply?
I'd guess that the files remain accessible. However...
Please use unreleased code, especially from the Incubator, with extreme care.
Nob
...@gmail.com]On Behalf Of Sam Ruby
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 6:49
>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Bluesky status and plans (was: Monthly reports missing)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
&
Noel
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: sa3r...@gmail.com [mailto:sa3r...@gmail.com]On Behalf Of Sam Ruby
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 6:49
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Bluesky status and plans (was: Monthly reports missing)
>>
>>
&g
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> All past struggles aside, if there are no credible plans to produce an
>> ASF project after 2.5 years, then IMHO it is time to begin the process
>> of terminating the incubation of this podling.
>
> I'm not arguing tha
Sam Ruby wrote:
> All past struggles aside, if there are no credible plans to produce an
> ASF project after 2.5 years, then IMHO it is time to begin the process
> of terminating the incubation of this podling.
I'm not arguing that point. As I had replied, we can start the dormancy
discussion w
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Bernd Fondermann
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 16:15, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> We can take that up with the community. They've certainly had their
>> struggles, but seem to come back sporadically.
>
> I've been following the mailing list for a while now and
gmail.com]On Behalf Of Sam Ruby
> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 6:49
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Bluesky status and plans (was: Monthly reports missing)
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> I know that it is early (as in the earlie
neral@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Bluesky status and plans (was: Monthly reports missing)
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> I know that it is early (as in the earliest that the meeting could possibly
> happen), but we're late. BeanValidation, Bluesky, Isis, and Wave are al
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> I know that it is early (as in the earliest that the meeting could possibly
> happen), but we're late. BeanValidation, Bluesky, Isis, and Wave are all
> missing from the Wiki.
Bluesky entered incubation nearly three and half years ago.
12 matches
Mail list logo
