r.apache.org <mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>
Cc: Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >
Subject: [IP CLEARANCE] CloudStack Terraform Provider project contribution
Hi Incubator PMC,
The Apache CloudStack PMC has voted to accept the donation of " CloudStack
Ter
r.apache.org <mailto:general@incubator.apache.org>
Cc: Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >
Subject: [IP CLEARANCE] CloudStack Go SDK project contribution
Hi Incubator PMC,
The Apache CloudStack PMC has voted to accept the donation of " CloudStack
Go SDK", which
is
There were no -1 votes, therefore this IP clearance vote passes by lazy
consensus. Thank you!
Kind regards
Paul Angus
From: pau...@apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:51 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Rohit Yadav
Subject: [IP CLEARANCE] CloudStack Terraform
There were no -1 votes, therefore this IP clearance vote passes by lazy
consensus. Thank you!
Kind regards
Paul Angus
From: pau...@apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:51 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Rohit Yadav
Subject: [IP CLEARANCE] CloudStack Go SDK project
Hi Incubator PMC,
The Apache CloudStack PMC has voted to accept the donation of " CloudStack
Go SDK", which
is a web based API for CloudStack [1].
Please vote to accept this contribution.
This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance process [2],
open for a
Hi Incubator PMC,
The Apache CloudStack PMC has voted to accept the donation of " CloudStack
Terraform Provider", which
is a Terraform provider for CloudStack [1].
Please vote to accept this contribution.
This is a lazy consensus majority vote, per the IP clearance process
vote passes by lazy consensus
> On May 1, 2015, at 10:20 AM, sebgoa wrote:
>
> ping on this, would be nice to get at least another pair of eyes on it
>
> On Apr 28, 2015, at 5:03 PM, sebgoa wrote:
>
>> Apache CloudStack is receiving code for a Google GCE interface t
Vote passes by lazy consensus
> On Apr 28, 2015, at 5:03 PM, sebgoa wrote:
>
> Apache CloudStack is receiving code for an EC2 interface to the CloudStack
> API.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-ec2stack.html
>
> Please vote to approve this
Looks sane to me, +1
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:03 AM, sebgoa wrote:
> Apache CloudStack is receiving code for an EC2 interface to the CloudStack
> API.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-ec2stack.html
>
> Please vote to approve this contribution.
>
>
Looks sane to me, +1
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:03 AM, sebgoa wrote:
> Apache CloudStack is receiving code for a Google GCE interface to the
> CloudStack API.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-gstack.html
>
> Please vote to approve this contribution.
ping on this, would be nice to get at least another pair of eyes on it
On Apr 28, 2015, at 5:03 PM, sebgoa wrote:
> Apache CloudStack is receiving code for a Google GCE interface to the
> CloudStack API.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-gstack.html
>
&
ping on this, would be nice to get at least another pair of eyes on it
On Apr 28, 2015, at 5:03 PM, sebgoa wrote:
> Apache CloudStack is receiving code for an EC2 interface to the CloudStack
> API.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-ec2stack.html
>
&
Apache CloudStack is receiving code for a Google GCE interface to the
CloudStack API.
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-gstack.html
Please vote to approve this contribution.
Lazy consensus applies.
If no -1 votes are cast within the next 72 hours, the vote passes.
Thanks
Apache CloudStack is receiving code for an EC2 interface to the CloudStack API.
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-ec2stack.html
Please vote to approve this contribution.
Lazy consensus applies.
If no -1 votes are cast within the next 72 hours, the vote passes.
Thanks
Hi,
This is a heads up and request for help to prepare for a IP clearance request
for two code base to be donated to Apache CloudStack:
ec2stack: https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack
and,
gstack: https://github.com/NOPping/gstack
Its two software there were developed on github by myself
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 02:05:06AM -0500, Chip Childers wrote:
> Citrix has donated a plugin for Apache CloudStack to support RDP
> connectivity for virtual machines running within Hyper-V hypervisors.
>
> IP Clearance Document:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-cleara
Citrix has donated a plugin for Apache CloudStack to support RDP
connectivity for virtual machines running within Hyper-V hypervisors.
IP Clearance Document:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-rdp-client.html
Please vote to approve this contribution. Lazy consensus applies: if
With no comments, I'll proceed to accept this donation. Thanks.
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 01:50:47PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> Juniper Networks, Inc has dontated a plugin for Apache CloudStack to
> work with their Contrail networking software.
>
> IP Clearance Do
Juniper Networks, Inc has dontated a plugin for Apache CloudStack to
work with their Contrail networking software.
IP Clearance Document:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-contrail-plugin.html
Please vote to approve this contribution. Lazy consensus applies: if no
-1 votes
gt;
> -chip
>
> [1]
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-marvin-test-suite.html
>
> 72 hours have passed with no objections. We will proceed with the import.
Thanks!
Citrix has donated the source code artifact detailed at [1] to the ASF.
This email is to request lazy consensus from the IPMC for the IP
clearance of this donation.
Please reply with questions or concerns if there are any.
-chip
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-marvin
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 09:55:51AM -0400, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Please do it.
Done - thx.
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It looks like I hadn't updated CloudStack's status to graduated soon
> > enough to have the incubator report generation p
Please do it.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It looks like I hadn't updated CloudStack's status to graduated soon
> enough to have the incubator report generation process skip it on the
> wiki.
>
> Anyone mind if I simply remove CloudStack's section from the re
Hi all,
It looks like I hadn't updated CloudStack's status to graduated soon
enough to have the incubator report generation process skip it on the
wiki.
Anyone mind if I simply remove CloudStack's section from the report
page? We'll be reporting directly to the board this month.
http://wiki.apa
Uh, +1 also! Drat, missed the window.
I wanted to mention that the Apache CloudStack PPMC has done a great job
on ensuring their branding comes over cleanly from Citrix, and has
really put work into building an independent community, so kudos are
definitely deserved.
- Shane
On 3/17/2013
After 72 hours, the vote to graduate CloudStack from the incubator has
*passed*. Thank you everyone!
I'll forward a request to be on the agenda of the next board meeting to
board@ momentarily.
+1: 12 binding, 4 non-binding
+0: none
-1: none
Binding votes:
* Noah Slater
* Alex Karasulu
* D
+1 (binding)
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> + 1 (binding)
>
> Great going in a short time (given the size of the project), All the best
> as a TLP,
> Suresh
>
> On Mar 14, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>
> > Apache CloudSta
+ 1 (binding)
Great going in a short time (given the size of the project), All the best as a
TLP,
Suresh
On Mar 14, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
> significant progress with the project since moving o
+1 !
On 14/03/2013, at 12:47 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
> significant progress with the project since moving over to Apache.
>
> We have 31 committers and 13 PPMC members listed on our status page at [1],
>
+1 (binding)
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (non binding)
On 03/14/2013 09:47 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
significant progress with the project since moving over to Apache.
We have 31 committers and 13 PPMC members listed on our status page at [1],
not including the
What Niall said. +1 and congrats.
Danese
On Mar 15, 2013, at 7:08 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Thanks for laying out all the evidence for graduation - this was a
> good vote email.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Niall
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Chip Childers
>
Thanks for laying out all the evidence for graduation - this was a
good vote email.
+1 from me.
Niall
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
> significant progress with the project since moving o
+1!
On Mar 14, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
> significant progress with the project since moving over to Apache.
>
> We have 31 committers and 13 PPMC members listed on our status page at [1],
>
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 14, 2013, at 9:47 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
> significant progress with the project since moving over to Apache.
>
> We have 31 committers and 13 PPMC members listed on our st
+1 non-binding
-- Andrei Savu
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
> +1 non-binding
> --
> Ioan Eugen Stan
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-
+1 non-binding
--
Ioan Eugen Stan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
I've been keeping a bit of an eye on that community and FWIW
I think they are in a reasonable shape.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
> significant progre
+1
Dan
On Mar 14, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
> significant progress with the project since moving over to Apache.
>
> We have 31 committers and 13 PPMC members listed on our status page at
surroundings.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
> On 03/14/2013 05:47 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> > Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
> > significant progress with the project since moving over to Apache.
> >
> > We have 31 comm
hat is my opinion at least), always give feedback, and
aren't afraid of using bleeding edge tools (even those written by me),
which speaks warmly of your ability to adjust to new surroundings.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 03/14/2013 05:47 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Apache CloudStack entered th
+1
(I figure a second vote from me can't hurt...)
On 14 March 2013 16:47, Chip Childers wrote:
> Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
> significant progress with the project since moving over to Apache.
>
> We have 31 committers and 13 PPMC
Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
significant progress with the project since moving over to Apache.
We have 31 committers and 13 PPMC members listed on our status page at [1],
not including the 8 mentors that helped guide our community through incubation
.
> Establish whether "Apache CloudStack" is a suitable name
>
>
> Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-23
> URL:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-23
&g
s an Apache project.
Thanks to CloudStack PPMC for being diligent as always!
> Establish whether "Apache CloudStack" is a suitable name
>
>
> Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-23
> U
David Nalley created PODLINGNAMESEARCH-23:
-
Summary: Establish whether "Apache CloudStack" is a suitable name
Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-23
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAM
After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.0.1-incubating *passes* with 3
IPMC +1 vote:
+1 (binding)
* Jim Jagielski
* Olivier Lamy
* Alex Karasulu
There were no -1 or +0 votes cast.
Jim, Olivier, and Alex voted on the cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
vote thread [1].
I will be publishing
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) release,
4.0.1-incubating.
This has been voted through on the cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
mailing list (vote thread [1], and results [2]), and now requires a vote
on general@incubator.apache.org.
3 IPMC votes
Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete.
--David
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 5:06 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Citrix wishes to donate to code that enables Juniper SRX and F5 Big IP
> to work in inline mode within CloudStack.
>
> - Code is on people.a
Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete.
--David
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:52 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Citrix wishes to donate code that permits users of CloudStack to reset
> the SSH key of a VM in an automated fashion.
>
> - The code in ques
Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete.
--David
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:31 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Citrix wishes to donate a feature around providing the option to
> assign a public IP as an Elastic IP in Basic Zones in CloudStack.
>
&g
Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete.
--David
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 3:48 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Citrix has offered a donation of code to enable L4-L7 Network Services
> in shared networks using VLAN isolation in CloudStack.
>
> - Cod
form has been submitted to the incubator site. [2]
> - The CloudStack vote to accept the contribution passed [3]
>
> One thing to note on this particular submission is that the copyright
> headers aren't currently in compliance with the ASF guidelines, and
> will need to be cleaned up
Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete.
--David
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:43 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> Citrix has offered donation of egress firewall manipulation for guest
> networks to Apache CloudStack.
>
> - The code was uploaded to R
Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete.
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:30 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> Citrix has documentation it wishes to donate to Apache CloudStack
>
> - The ASF Secretary has recorded an ICLA from the author (Jessica Tomechak).
Citrix wishes to donate to code that enables Juniper SRX and F5 Big IP
to work in inline mode within CloudStack.
- Code is on people.a.o [1]
- Author (Kelven Yang) has signed an ICLA which has been acknowledged
by secretary@
- IP clearance form is up on the incubator website.
- Vote has passed
Citrix wishes to donate code that permits users of CloudStack to reset
the SSH key of a VM in an automated fashion.
- The code in question is on review board [1]
- The author (Harikrishna Patnala) has submitted an ICLA to secretary@
which has been received.
- The IP clearance form is on the
Citrix wishes to donate a feature around providing the option to
assign a public IP as an Elastic IP in Basic Zones in CloudStack.
- The patch is available on people.a.o [1]
- The author (Murali Reddy) has signed an ICLA which has been recorded
as received by secretary@
- The IP Clearance form
Citrix has offered a donation of code to enable L4-L7 Network Services
in shared networks using VLAN isolation in CloudStack.
- Code is available on people.a.o [1]
- Author (Murali Reddy) has submitted a ICLA to secretary@, and it's
noted on the committer index as having been received.
- Donation uploaded to people.a.o [1]
- ICLA from the author (Frank Zhang) has been received by the ASF Secretary.
- IP Clearance form has been submitted to the incubator site. [2]
- The CloudStack vote to accept the contribution passed [3]
One thing to note on this particular submission is that
Citrix has offered donation of egress firewall manipulation for guest
networks to Apache CloudStack.
- The code was uploaded to ReviewBoard by the author (Jayapal Reddy) [1]
- The ASF secretary has received an ICLA from Jayapal.
- The IP clearance form has been submitted to the incubator site[2
Citrix has documentation it wishes to donate to Apache CloudStack
- The ASF Secretary has recorded an ICLA from the author (Jessica Tomechak).
- The source code for this documentation was uploaded to people.a.o [1]
- The IP Clearance form has been added to the incubator site [2]
- The CloudStack
Hi
Re-reviewed the report and re-signed it
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:31 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
> > If I read the diffs correctly, Joe just posted an update to the report
> > which removed all the mentor signoffs.
> >
> > Was th
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> If I read the diffs correctly, Joe just posted an update to the report
> which removed all the mentor signoffs.
>
> Was this on purpose?
>
This was on purpose.
See: http://markmail.org/message/w5mjdw3yfuxgrv3v
--David
-
May have simply been to indicate that
there's new content in the report that
needs to be processed by mentors. I'm
not worried about it personally.
>
> From: Benson Margulies
>To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org; "general@incubat
After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.0.0-incubating *passes* with
5 IPMC +1 votes.
+1 (binding)
* Jim Jagielski
* Olivier Lamy
* Brett Porter
* Daniel Kulp
* Noah Slater
There were no -1 or +0 votes cast.
Jim, Oliver, Brett, Daniel and Noah voted on the
cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
Thanks for the clarification Roy.
On 31 October 2012 05:29, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> [generic incubator comments -- nothing specific to CloudStack] ...
>
> On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > On 29 October 2012 14:48, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> >> On Mo
[generic incubator comments -- nothing specific to CloudStack] ...
On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> On 29 October 2012 14:48, Chip Childers wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>> But regardless, you couldn't. A single -1 vote
this list yesterday about the about the waf file, which
> I believe to be resolved now.)
>
>
> On 30 October 2012 18:51, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release
>> 4.0.0-incubating.
>>
; I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release
> 4.0.0-incubating.
>
> This has been voted through on the cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> mailing list (vote thread at [1], results at [2]), and now requires a
> vote on general@incubator.apache.org
>
Hi All,
I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release
4.0.0-incubating.
This has been voted through on the cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
mailing list (vote thread at [1], results at [2]), and now requires a
vote on general@incubator.apache.org
5 IPMC votes have
Thanks for investigating this, Chip.
I am happy with us proceeding, but would caution us to think about
addressing or documenting this in a later release.
I'd say wait until tomorrow to see if anyone else objects then wrap up the
vote.
Let's ship this thing!
On 29 October 2012 16:21, Chip Child
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> Bertrand, is a compressed archive of source a source or a binary?
>
> hehe...right, you said earlier in this thread that the file in
> question is actually just compressed
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>> So, it's no more good (or bad) than shipping a .tar.bz2 of
>> some category A open source code (given the license).
>
> +1
>
> From your description, this is different from
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> So, it's no more good (or bad) than shipping a .tar.bz2 of
> some category A open source code (given the license).
+1
>From your description, this is different from a compiled object file, it's
compressed source. No information is lost
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Bertrand, is a compressed archive of source a source or a binary?
hehe...right, you said earlier in this thread that the file in
question is actually just compressed source code, is that correct?
If yes, it's just weird to include it in
Bertrand, is a compressed archive of source a source or a binary?
On Oct 29, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Nice summary Bertrand.
>
>
> On 29 October 2012 15:22, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Chip Childers
>> wrote:
>>> ...Waf is a packagin
Nice summary Bertrand.
On 29 October 2012 15:22, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > ...Waf is a packaging utility, used to create RPMs and DEBs. Work is
> > currently ongoing to remove it (and it's use) from the project
> > entirely
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> ...Waf is a packaging utility, used to create RPMs and DEBs. Work is
> currently ongoing to remove it (and it's use) from the project
> entirely...
> ...That will be several weeks of work (not days),
> which is significantly longer than
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Florian Holeczek
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Noah,
>>>
We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
of the source
example, I'll abort if the advice here is
> that waf needs to be removed in it's current form.
>
This may be an area for project bylaws.
On CouchDB, as the release manager, I added this to our release process:
"The release manager has the power to abort a vote at any point and fo
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> On 29 October 2012 14:48, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>> > Thanks for following up Chip. Though I do just want to clarify one
>> > misconception.
>> >
>> > On 29 October 2012 13:21, Chip Chi
Veto or none veto, binding or non-binding, a -1 vote is an indication of a
problem. Process for process sake is pointless and unproductive, so I don't
care about the technicalities. A good RM should be looking for excuses to
halt the release. (Even though he may strongly want the release to be
succ
Le 10/29/12 3:39 PM, Noah Slater a écrit :
Thanks for following up Chip. Though I do just want to clarify one
misconception.
On 29 October 2012 13:21, Chip Childers wrote:
I actually have more than enough votes right now to close the thread
out on the project's dev list, and open up a vote fo
On 29 October 2012 14:48, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Thanks for following up Chip. Though I do just want to clarify one
> > misconception.
> >
> > On 29 October 2012 13:21, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I actually have more than enough
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Thanks for following up Chip. Though I do just want to clarify one
> misconception.
>
> On 29 October 2012 13:21, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>>
>> I actually have more than enough votes right now to close the thread
>> out on the project's dev li
Thanks for following up Chip. Though I do just want to clarify one
misconception.
On 29 October 2012 13:21, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> I actually have more than enough votes right now to close the thread
> out on the project's dev list, and open up a vote for the IPMC.
No you don't.
To me, this
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Florian Holeczek wrote:
>> Hi Noah,
>>
>>> We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
>>> of the source:
>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudst
Hi all,
I'm the RM for the release, so I wanted to provide some context to
Noah's question. Some of this has already been mentioned on the
project's vote thread, but I'll bring it up again here to see if there
are any thoughts to help us decide if this is a blocker or not. At
this point, I'm hol
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Florian Holeczek wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
>> We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
>> of the source:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=waf;hb=HEAD
>>
>> It seems to be a sort of
Hi Noah,
> We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
> of the source:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=waf;hb=HEAD
>
> It seems to be a sort of hybrid source/binary file. Very strange.
>
> Can we ship this?
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> ...We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
> of the source:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=waf;hb=HEAD
>
> It seems to be a sort of hybrid source/binary
Hey,
We're just voting on our first release, and I spotted this file in the root
of the source:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=waf;hb=HEAD
It seems to be a sort of hybrid source/binary file. Very strange.
Can we ship this?
Thanks,
--
NS
p the CloudStack project with ASF.
Looking forward to it, and thanks all!
-kevin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
Matt Hogstrom
m...@hogstrom.org
A Day Without Nuclear Fusion Is a Day Without Sunshine
On Apr 9, 2012, at 9:32 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
> The proposal is available at [1] and I have also
I believe this [VOTE] is ready to be wrapped up Kevin ;)
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2012, at 9:32 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
>
> > Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the
> Incubator. The proposal is available
On Apr 9, 2012, at 9:32 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
> The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
> vote with:
> +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
> +0: don't
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
+1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
PS. Unless you've already done so, please get in touch with the ASF
infra team as soon as possible on the various i
On 10/04/2012, at 11:32 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
> The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
> vote with:
> +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
> +0: don't
+1! (binding)
Arun
On Apr 10, 2012, at 7:02 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
> The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
> vote with:
> +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
