Re: GitHub workflows?

2017-03-07 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:34 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: >> For what it's worth, on one dev list I'm on, pull requests make it to the >> dev list, but commenting on a commit via the Github interface

Re: GitHub workflows?

2017-03-07 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Thanks Marvin for the pointers. But my question is not so much whether we can accept pull requests or handle GH issues. It is whether it is ok to be the *primary* workflow and dev@ is an archive. The podling is coming from a GitHub-only culture, and the core team in the same company. S... 1.

Re: GitHub workflows?

2017-03-06 Thread Greg Stein
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:34 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >... > So, the questions I would ask are, are all those comments making it to the > list? And are the podling participants showing through their actions that > they understand inclusiveness, by ensuring that dev

Re: GitHub workflows?

2017-03-06 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Thanks Daniel, I should have thought of that, since that is how I noticed > it. > > So, then the question should have been; > > Are we ok with podlings using GH "Issues" instead of ASF-hosted issue > tracker? > > Are we

Re: GitHub workflows?

2017-03-06 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
On Mon, 06 Mar 2017 10:29:54 +0100, "Raphael Bircher" wrote: > As long as all goes to the list, it's probably ok, but I would prefer ASF > Tools over third party tools. Thy are under the Foundation control. Even > GH is really strong at the moment, you don't know

Re: GitHub workflows?

2017-03-06 Thread Raphael Bircher
Hi Nicolas, * Am .03.2017, 05:53 Uhr, schrieb Niclas Hedhman : Thanks Daniel, I should have thought of that, since that is how I noticed it. So, then the question should have been; Are we ok with podlings using GH "Issues" instead of ASF-hosted issue tracker? Are we ok

Re: GitHub workflows?

2017-03-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
rote: On 03/06/2017 04:56 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: Everyone, I need to get an understanding of the use of GitHub workflows on Apache projects. In GH, it is possible to comment on commits and pull requests. Are those captured by infra@ and replicated somewhere, or is this "lost data" (I su

Re: GitHub workflows?

2017-03-05 Thread Jochen Theodorou
On 06.03.2017 04:56, Niclas Hedhman wrote: Everyone, I need to get an understanding of the use of GitHub workflows on Apache projects. In GH, it is possible to comment on commits and pull requests. Are those captured by infra@ and replicated somewhere, or is this "lost data"

Re: GitHub workflows?

2017-03-05 Thread Niclas Hedhman
easy about it, but does the Incubator as a whole have an opinion/resolution on it? Cheers Niclas On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > On 03/06/2017 04:56 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > Everyone, > > I need to get an understanding

Re: GitHub workflows?

2017-03-05 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 03/06/2017 04:56 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Everyone, > I need to get an understanding of the use of GitHub workflows on Apache > projects. > > In GH, it is possible to comment on commits and pull requests. Are those > captured by infra@ and replicated somewhere, or is t

GitHub workflows?

2017-03-05 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Everyone, I need to get an understanding of the use of GitHub workflows on Apache projects. In GH, it is possible to comment on commits and pull requests. Are those captured by infra@ and replicated somewhere, or is this "lost data" (I suspect) in case GitHub goes out of busines