On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> ...Have people seen similar cases before...
That doesn't look to be the case and I've just started a VOTE here to
reject such grants in the future.
-Bertrand
Thanks John, I would clarify this on the contributing organization side, and
pass
that along to the mentors. Thanks.
On 9/4/17, 8:13 AM, "John D. Ament" wrote:
Agreed that the grant in question is missing a proper Exhibit A. But
perhaps their intention with
Agreed that the grant in question is missing a proper Exhibit A. But
perhaps their intention with Exhibit A was to list what was excluded,
rather than what was included?
Considering that the committers in question had CLAs on file, I would be
surprised if 3rd Party Code were brought in.
John
Hi Bertrand,
I believe they were supposed to provide a list to go along with that zip file.
Can you double check?
Cheers,
Chris
On 9/4/17, 3:30 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
Hi,
I'm mentoring a podling where a large initial code donation just
Hi,
I'm mentoring a podling where a large initial code donation just happened.
The corresponding software grant points to a large zip file indicating
that the donation consists of that file's contents, "excluding any
third-party and separately licensed material" that it contains.
My