Re: Incubator cookbook: Podling Releases update

2019-12-02 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:47 PM Craig Russell wrote: > ...I believe that the current cookbook recommendations need an update. [1] ... Thank you Craig and others for these suggestions, I have incorporated them as follows: -Added a new "Two-phase vote on Podling Releases" to keep the

Re: Incubator cookbook: Podling Releases update

2019-11-25 Thread Juan Pan
Hi Bertrand, > So I'd say "votes from the podling dev list should be carried over to the > Incubator PMC vote, by explicitly mentioned them and including a link to the > corresponding vote tally (from lists.apache.org) in the Incubator PMC vote > message”. From my understanding, it means

Re: Incubator cookbook: Podling Releases update

2019-11-25 Thread Juan Pan
Hi Justin, I totally agree with you. Presenting votes and names of none-IMPCs not only helps other IMPCs check and vote, but is respectful for everyone’s effort. Regards, Trista Juan Pan panj...@apache.org Juan Pan(Trista), Apache ShardingSphere On 11/25/2019 15:13,Justin Mclean wrote:

Re: Incubator cookbook: Podling Releases update

2019-11-25 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > So I'd say "votes from the podling dev list should be carried over to > the Incubator PMC vote, by explicitly mentioned them and including a > link to the corresponding vote tally (from lists.apache.org) in the > Incubator PMC vote message”. +1 As usual Bertrand you put it more eloquently

Re: Incubator cookbook: Podling Releases update

2019-11-25 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:47 PM Craig Russell wrote: > ...2. Votes on the dev list should automatically carry over to the general > list... I disagree with making this automatic. It's fine for whoever starts the IPMC vote to indicate that dev list votes carry over, including a link to

Re: Incubator cookbook: Podling Releases update

2019-11-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > How about votes from PPMCs in dev@? As votes from PPMCs are unbinding in > general@, release manages would ignore those votes from dev@, and do not > present their names and votes when summarizing? Or on the contrary? IMO it nice to know how many votes it got on the devlist that were not

Re: Incubator cookbook: Podling Releases update

2019-11-22 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 from me, as long as the podling dev list IPMC votes are clearly indicated in the vote mail to the incubator general list. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Incubator cookbook: Podling Releases update

2019-11-22 Thread Craig Russell
I believe that the current cookbook recommendations need an update. [1] 1. "Binding" should always refer to IPMC members' votes. This is a source of confusion for many podling communities. 2. Votes on the dev list should automatically carry over to the general list. Assuming that there is no