Hi Justin,
I have just signed off and added my comments.
Thank you.
Regards,
Uma
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 6:03 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [MENTORS] Sign off on Incubator Reports
Hi,
The report has been submitted
Hi,
The report has been submitted but we’re still missing some sign offs.
If you haevn't signed off the report please do so over at:
https://whimsy.apache.org/board/agenda/2019-12-18/Incubator
It would be good to see more sign off for:
BatchEE
Druid
Hivemall
Marvin-AI
MesaTEE
Samoa
Spot (still
If a podling you are mentoring completes its report late, and there
are sections of it you are concerned with, should you sign off on it?
I've pinged the community about my concern, but I'm worried it won't
be addressed in time for submission tomorrow.
If I sign off on the report, it looks like
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
If a podling you are mentoring completes its report late, and there
are sections of it you are concerned with, should you sign off on it?
I've pinged the community about my concern, but I'm worried it won't
be addressed in
The podling in question is Stratos.
There was a lengthy discussion on a thread about graduation about
diversity. I raised it as an issue, as while the podling has clearly
shown activity around trying to diversify, the actual non-WSO2 to WSO2
spread had not changed much since I last flagged it as
FWIW as far as I am concerned, you can 'conditionally' sign off on a
report, that is, with comments, if there's things you need to say.
Upayavira
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
The podling in question is Stratos.
There was a lengthy discussion on a thread about
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
FWIW as far as I am concerned, you can 'conditionally' sign off on a
report, that is, with comments, if there's things you need to say.
Upayavira
+1 to that. And its still over a week till the baord meeting and lots of
The deadline is tonight, and the report is supposed to be submitted tomorrow.
On 8 April 2014 14:33, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
FWIW as far as I am concerned, you can 'conditionally' sign off on a
report, that is,
Okay, all sorted. Thanks for the feedback!
On 8 April 2014 14:46, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
The deadline is tonight, and the report is supposed to be submitted tomorrow.
On 8 April 2014 14:33, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Upayavira
Hi all,
I'm having problems posting our incubator board report (Apache Shiro)
to the wiki - apparently my username/password is no longer working.
I've requested a password reset, but have not received the email to do
so. Is there a way someone please post this in the meantime to ensure
the board
Incubator list, please disregard this request - It has been posted.
Thanks!
Les
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Les Hazlewood lhazlew...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having problems posting our incubator board report (Apache Shiro)
to the wiki - apparently my username/password is no
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:01 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
reports: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2009
Nothing for Cassandra, Droids, Lokahi, Pivot, VCL, or WSRP4J. XAP and
Stonehenge really should have had more to say.
I am concerned
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
reports: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2009
Nothing for Cassandra, Droids, Lokahi, Pivot, VCL, or WSRP4J. XAP and
Stonehenge really should have had more to say.
I am concerned about Cassandra. They are new to the Incubator,
but we have not received any
Craig Russell wrote:
I believe that while a podling is getting organized (first three
months) it's unlikely that they will get reporting, and during that
time, the mentors must step up and show the way.
But does that mean advising assisting, or doing the work?
--- Noel
smime.p7s
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I had asked Dave if he would work on [a Marvin-like script], but I don't
know that anything
got finished. Anyone want to take a shot at it?
Upayavira suggested something useful in another thread.
I can do that
Why are we being hectored on Monday when the reports are not even due?
So as an experiment, Craig, here we are with the February report due. And
without prodding, as I did in January, check out the state of the podling
reports: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2009
Nothing for
What about banning any releases until the report has been submitted? And if
necessary, closing off commit karma to make the point stick?
If the project is hibernating, those would effect it, but as Jukka
suggested, we would simply go through the process of suspending the project.
If the project
Provided that we get a Marvin like script for PPMC
I had asked Dave if he would work on that, but I don't know that anything
got finished. Anyone want to take a shot at it?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi Noel,
On Feb 16, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Why are we being hectored on Monday when the reports are not even
due?
So as an experiment, Craig, here we are with the February report
due. And
without prodding, as I did in January, check out the state of the
podling
On 1/19/09, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Craig Russell wrote:
To me it sounds that the Mentors are sleeping
Totally agree, it is the mentors responsibility to make sure their
podlings submit their reports on time.
Totally agree, it is the mentors responsibility to make sure
On Feb 16, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On 1/19/09, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Craig Russell wrote:
To me it sounds that the Mentors are sleeping
Totally agree, it is the mentors responsibility to make sure
their
podlings submit their reports on time.
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
A practical problem [is] that reports are submitted right up to the
deadline
Yes, that's something I discussed last month, and again today with Craig.
Asking the mentors to submit a confidential report (on private)
whenever a report is missed would be reasonable
Craig.Russell wrote:
Note that last month, I was not complaining about the messages, just
the timing. Apologies if that wasn't clear.
I knew it had to do with the timing, and just that, Craig. No worries.
My point is that people are not getting the reports done on time. Sure
*some* do, such
Craig Russell wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
A practical problem with this approach is that reports are submitted
right up to the deadline
I'm not sure I understand your point. The deadline is the Wednesday a
week ahead of the board meeting.
I believe that Robert was pointing out
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
What about banning any releases until the report has been submitted? And if
necessary, closing off commit karma to make the point stick?
To me, that sounds better than confidential reports. It's public,
transparent,
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Provided that we get a Marvin like script for PPMC
I had asked Dave if he would work on that, but I don't know that anything
got finished. Anyone want to take a shot at it?
Upayavira suggested something useful in another thread.
I can do that - when i find the
David Crossley wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I had asked Dave if he would work on [a Marvin-like script], but I don't
know that anything
got finished. Anyone want to take a shot at it?
Upayavira suggested something useful in another thread.
I can do that - when i find the time.
Thanks.
On Feb 16, 2009, at 6:58 PM, David Crossley wrote:
If we keep relying on mentors, then we are not
training the podlings in the ASF way. We are actually
training them to leave it all up to someone else.
I believe that while a podling is getting organized (first three
months) it's unlikely
On 2/17/09, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
On Feb 16, 2009, at 6:58 PM, David Crossley wrote:
If we keep relying on mentors, then we are not
training the podlings in the ASF way. We are actually
training them to leave it all up to someone else.
I believe that while a podling
Craig Russell wrote:
To me it sounds that the Mentors are sleeping
Totally agree, it is the mentors responsibility to make sure their
podlings submit their reports on time.
Totally agree, it is the mentors responsibility to make sure their
podlings submit their reports on time.
Provided that we get a Marvin like script for PPMC's to get notified
of a pending report, in my opinion:
- the first missing report should be dealt with by the Mentors on the
podling-dev list (to engage the community), and the podling has to
report the next month.
- the second consecutive missing
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
...On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
I think that it is, unfortunately, time to have a discussion as to the
consequences of what happens when a
On Jan 13, 2009, at 2:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Niclas Hedhman
nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
...On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com
wrote:
I think that it is, unfortunately, time to have a discussion as
to the
Where are the reports for BlueSky, Cassandra, Imperius, JSPWiki, Stonehenge,
Lucene.net, Sanselan, Tashi, Thrift, and VCL? This is unacceptable to have
so many projects disregarding the need to report.
At the least, BlueSky, Lucene.net, Olio, and RCF have missed the report a
few times now. What
I think that it is, unfortunately, time to have a discussion as to the
consequences of what happens when a project misses its report. Perhaps not
a one-off, but on a becoming regular process.
Rather than put my two cents in on this to start, I'll open the topic, and
ask for contributions of
Sanselan is there now. Thank you.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
I think that it is, unfortunately, time to have a discussion as to the
consequences of what happens when a project misses its report. Perhaps not
a one-off, but on a becoming regular process.
Termination after three
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
JSecurity: I really don't need to go follow URLs into SVN (or tracking down
e-mails as with some others) when assembling the report. Please follow the
practice of putting your report in the Wiki.
I'm happy to put it in
Les Hazlewood wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
JSecurity: I really don't need to go follow URLs into SVN (or tracking down
e-mails as with some others) when assembling the report. Please follow the
practice of putting your report in the Wiki.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
What is policy? I'm just trying to learn - thanks for any guidance!
Just as I said : write down the report (either as a simple mail, or in SVN),
and when validated by the team, then push the content to the wiki
Les Hazlewood wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
What is policy? I'm just trying to learn - thanks for any guidance!
Just as I said : write down the report (either as a simple mail, or in SVN),
and when validated by the team, then
Beautimous. That's my preference :)
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Les Hazlewood wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
What is policy? I'm just trying to learn - thanks for any guidance!
Put it in svn 2 weeks before your report is due, send message to your
private list (or dev if that is your process) telling your PPMC
members to look at the report, augment it and ensure it reflects your
status. Then a few days before the due date send a reminder that the
report is now close to
On Jan 12, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Where are the reports for BlueSky, Cassandra, Imperius, JSPWiki,
Stonehenge,
Lucene.net, Sanselan, Tashi, Thrift, and VCL? This is unacceptable
to have
so many projects disregarding the need to report.
At the least, BlueSky, Lucene.net,
Les Hazlewood wrote:
I'm happy to put it in the wiki and I will do so as soon as I can.
Thanks. I saw that you guys had done so. :-)
I did the link because we were modifying the file over the last two
days.
I thought I was actually acting in the 'wiki spirit' by ensuring
that the data
On Jan 12, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Where are the reports for BlueSky, Cassandra, Imperius, JSPWiki,
Stonehenge,
Lucene.net, Sanselan, Tashi, Thrift, and VCL? This is unacceptable
to have
so many projects disregarding the need to report.
For several months, the practice
At the least, BlueSky, Lucene.net, Olio, and RCF have missed the
report a few times now. What is their status?
I think you have Olio confused with some other project.
Olio has filed a report every time.
I had done a quick check, and noticed the e-mail thread in November about
Olio being
Personally, I don't subscribe to changes to the Incubator wiki. I have
no bandwidth to track 19 podlings' updates to the page. So if you
update the wiki without a corresponding discussion, please notify the
dev alias.
And I find it extremely useful to keep the project history in the
Where are the reports for BlueSky, Cassandra, Imperius, JSPWiki,
Stonehenge,
Lucene.net, Sanselan, Tashi, Thrift, and VCL? This is unacceptable
to have
so many projects disregarding the need to report.
JSPWiki has been added.
Sorry guys, the report has been ready for a few days in the
JSPWiki has been added.
Thank you. :-)
there were some personal circumstances which made me
forget to copy it to the wiki earlier today.
No worries. Just trying to make sure that it all gets done. :-)
--- Noel
Craig.Russell wrote:
For several months, the practice has been to have podling reports
posted to the wiki by the Wednesday prior to the board meeting, giving
5 days for the IPMC to review the reports
Just to be clear, the Boad report is due on Monday, so those five days would
be some part of
Lucene.NET posted now, too. Thank you.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
2007-December Imperius Incubator status report
Imperius has been incubating since November 2007.
Imperius is a rule-based infrastructure management tool
Infrastructure has been partly set up. Mailing lists for dev, commits,
private, and user are operational. The repository has been set up.
Done
On Nov 11, 2007, at 11:02 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Bruce Snyder wrote:
ServiceMix graduated from the Incubator, is it still required to
report?
It is required to clean up http://incubator.apache.org/projects.
--- Noel
Has the November board report deadline changed?
Yes, which is why I told people about it in October and then again over a
week ago. The Board is meeting at ApacheCon this Wednesday.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe,
James M Snell wrote:
I am preparing the Abdera report now; once I hear back from the other
committers on whether there is anything else to add I will post it.
The Incubator PMC has a deadline to meet. That deadline is about an hour
from now. I am preparing the report now and will submit it.
Posted.
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
James M Snell wrote:
I am preparing the Abdera report now; once I hear back from the other
committers on whether there is anything else to add I will post it.
The Incubator PMC has a deadline to meet. That deadline is about an hour
from now. I am
With or without Abdera, which is not yet posted.
With. Got it just now.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... from:
Abdera
Lokahi
NMaven
ServiceMix
Woden
WSRP4J
XAP
Yoko
They must be submitted IMMEDIATELY.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 11, 2007 1:45 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... from:
Abdera
Lokahi
NMaven
ServiceMix
Woden
WSRP4J
XAP
Yoko
They must be submitted IMMEDIATELY.
ServiceMix graduated from the Incubator, is it still
I am preparing the Abdera report now; once I hear back from the other
committers on whether there is anything else to add I will post it. My
apologies for it being late.
- James
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
... from:
Abdera
Lokahi
NMaven
ServiceMix
Woden
Bruce Snyder wrote:
ServiceMix graduated from the Incubator, is it still required to report?
It is required to clean up http://incubator.apache.org/projects.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
03:45 PM
Please respond to
general@incubator.apache.org
To
general@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
RE: November Incubator Reports ARE LATE!
... from:
Abdera
Lokahi
NMaven
ServiceMix
Woden
Subject
RE: November Incubator Reports ARE LATE!
... from:
Abdera
Lokahi
NMaven
ServiceMix
Woden
WSRP4J
XAP
Yoko
They must be submitted
On Nov 11, 2007, at 12:45 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
... from:
Abdera
Lokahi
NMaven
ServiceMix
Woden
WSRP4J
XAP
Yoko
They must be submitted IMMEDIATELY.
The Yoko report has been submitted. Sorry about the delay.
Regards,
@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
RE: November Incubator Reports ARE LATE!
... from:
Abdera
Lokahi
NMaven
ServiceMix
Woden
WSRP4J
XAP
Yoko
It's that time again ... :-) The Board is meeting at ApacheCon, so we're
going to need to be a bit earlier this month. Please have your reports
completed by THIS WEEKEND at the latest.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe,
Hi Noel
Could you please clarify THIS WEEKEND, is it TODAY ? Or Nov 11?
On 11/4/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's that time again ... :-) The Board is meeting at ApacheCon, so we're
going to need to be a bit earlier this month. Please have your reports
completed by THIS
Could you please clarify THIS WEEKEND, is it TODAY ? Or Nov 11?
:-) November 9th -- BY the weekend, not AT the weekend.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
It is that time again ... :-)
I will likely be preparing the October report on the drive home Sunday
afternoon, and submitting it late Sunday night EDT, so please try to have
all reports and reviews completed ASAP.
--- Noel
Here's the incubator status report for JSPWiki
2007-October JSPWiki Incubator status report
The project has kicked off with some basic infrastructure now in place.
Mailing lists have been set up and subscriptions from the previous
mailing
lists are being transferred.
The svn repository is
Here's the report for Sanselan.
2007-October Sanselan Incubator status report
The project has kicked off with some basic infrastructure now in place.
Mailing lists have been set up. The structure of the project has been
discussed; plans are to use maven using Jackrabbit as a model.
A site was
It is that time again ... :-)
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/19/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/19/07, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/19/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
1. should the information be public?
Yes.
2. should the information be machine readable?
Not at the expense of making
I notice that we already have a place where we can put structured
information. Each project has a project.xml file where the status
is recorded. This file gets transformed into the project.html file
for the site.
All we need to do is to decide on an xml tag that identifies the
reporting
On 6/18/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says next
month.
A frequent if not constant problem. I keep complaining about the
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says
next
month.
A frequent if not constant problem. I
On 6/19/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says
On 6/19/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. should the information be public?
Yes.
2. should the information be machine readable?
Not at the expense of making it hard for humans to maintain it. If
you can't make sense of the format in 10 seconds or less, then it's
On 6/19/07, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/19/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. should the information be public?
Yes.
2. should the information be machine readable?
Not at the expense of making it hard for humans to maintain it. If
you can't make
ADF Faces == Trinidad
= Graduated
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
Oversight implies at least three reviewers of each report.
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule and
Wicket was removed prior to its graduation, probably best to add it
until the final vote has been cast. I'll add Wicket to the schedule
again. (we were due in june)
Martijn
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from
Hi,
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tika (scheduled July in ReportingSchedule)
Tika is still doing the first three monthly reports and will switch to
the normal quarterly schedule next month.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
On Jun 18, 2007, at 7:13 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
Oversight implies at least three reviewers of each report.
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule and
already recorded in
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together so
it's likely to be a little late
Oversight implies at least three reviewers of each report.
Did a review just now..
Mvgr,
Martin
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together so
it's likely to be a
On 6/18/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did a review just now..
thanks
just before i cut the final version :-)
- robert
Leo Simons wrote:
This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says next
month.
A frequent if not constant problem. I keep complaining about the problem of
redundant and often incorrect meta-data. To resolve it, I'm considering
deleting the schedules from the Wiki entirely, and
robert burrell donkin wrote:
noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together so
it's likely to be a little late
Back online now ... until the service tech shows up tomorrow to replace the
motherboard, fan, and keyboard.
we could *really* do with one more reviewer
+1
On 6/18/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
noel is having hardware issues and he's asked me to pull this together
so
it's likely to be a little late
Back online now ... until the service tech shows up tomorrow to replace
the
motherboard, fan, and
On 6/18/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says next
month.
A frequent if not constant problem. I keep complaining about the problem
of
redundant and often incorrect meta-data. To resolve it, I'm
robert burrell donkin wrote:
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
This scheduling stuff keeps confusing me. My own calendar says next
month.
A frequent if not constant problem. I keep complaining about the
problem
of redundant and often incorrect meta-data. To
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
Oversight implies at least three reviewers of each report.
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule and
already recorded in http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2007 ...
Ode
OpenEJB
hello noel,
sorry for being late in the game...
I just added ADF Faces (Trinidad)
-M
On 12/18/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Noel,
My apologies on behalf of Cayenne. I've added an entry for Cayenne
to the wiki based on the discussions posted to Cayenne-dev last week.
On
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Yes, its that time of the month again, so this should not come as a
surprise
to anyone. Reports are due on or by Friday, December 15, 2006
And, once again, I am finalizing the Board report, and I have a long list of
missing projects: ActiveMQ (and they expect to go TLP,
I've added the OpenEJB report. Sorry for missing the deadline.
On 18/12/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Yes, its that time of the month again, so this should not come as a
surprise
to anyone. Reports are due on or by Friday, December 15, 2006
And, once
Brett Porter wrote:
I've added the OpenEJB report. Sorry for missing the deadline.
Thanks. I've copied from the Wiki into my e-mail.
Anything that gets in before I go to sleep tonight will make it into the
report. Anything after that takes its chances. I might have time in the
morning
Noel,
My apologies on behalf of Cayenne. I've added an entry for Cayenne
to the wiki based on the discussions posted to Cayenne-dev last week.
On 12/17/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Yes, its that time of the month again, so this should not come as a
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
I've added an entry for Cayenne to the wiki based on
the discussions posted to Cayenne-dev last week.
Got it.
Please note that newly accepted TLPs have to report every month for the
first three months, so assuming that the Board accepts Cayenne and OFBiz,
that would
Dan Diephouse wrote:
Just add yourself to the monthly schedule on the wiki and then you'll be
scheduled (pick any group you like) :-)
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
Also, new incubator projects must report every month for the first three
months. After that then the
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
