Re: Log4jcxx2 status

2017-03-06 Thread Ralph Goers
OK. Before we hold a vote on general I think we should hold a vote in logging service, although I really don’t know what would happen if it didn’t pass. Unfortunately, the board isn’t going to be happy since the only sane place to have that vote is on the private list. Most of the PMC members

Re: Log4jcxx2 status

2017-03-06 Thread Rhys Ulerich
Apologies for falling down as a member of the reboot team. Thank you to Thorsten for trying so hard for so long. Glad to see the code survive. - Rhys On Mar 6, 2017 5:04 PM, "John D. Ament" wrote: > Ralph, > > Sounds fair to me. Based on what we did for CommonsRDF, I'd

Re: Log4jcxx2 status

2017-03-06 Thread John D. Ament
Ralph, Sounds fair to me. Based on what we did for CommonsRDF, I'd recommend that we hold a vote on the general@incubator list indicating the intent to transfer log4cxx from Incubator to Logging. The steps are pretty close on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#subproject John

Log4jcxx2 status

2017-03-06 Thread Ralph Goers
The attempt to reboot Log4cxx has not had the hoped for results. Under normal circumstances the project would probably be terminated at Apache. However, this project came to the incubator from the Logging Services project in hopes that it would be able to generate more activity since there were