Re: Mentors and members (was: Re: Mentors On IPMC [WAS Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)])

On 4/5/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/5/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, incubator policy is able to contradict itself on one and the same page: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html [...] Acceptance By Incubator

Re: Mentors and members (was: Re: Mentors On IPMC [WAS Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)])

On 4/5/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i've always assumed that every mentor needed to be a member but IMHO we should really consider what the rule should be and then vote to amend the policy appropriately. At one time, there was only one mentor, and now there are three, and

Mentors and members (was: Re: Mentors On IPMC [WAS Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)])

Well, incubator policy is able to contradict itself on one and the same page: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html [...] Acceptance By Incubator [...] * the Mentors, nominated by the Sponsor, who will guide the Candidate through the Incubation Process. At least one

Re: Mentors and members (was: Re: Mentors On IPMC [WAS Re: [Vote] RCF proposal (was: [Proposal] RCF - a rich component library for JSF)])

On 4/5/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, incubator policy is able to contradict itself on one and the same page: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html [...] Acceptance By Incubator [...] * the Mentors, nominated by the Sponsor, who will guide