Re: Not just yet (was: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Brooklyn from incubator)

2015-10-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:43 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Any reason you need 4 weeks to add the paragraph back?.. 4 weeks is to get the board to vote on the resolution - our meeting was yesterday and the next one is on November 18. As Hadrian says, It is unfortunate that

Re: Not just yet (was: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Brooklyn from incubator)

2015-10-22 Thread John D. Ament
Ah ha. It wasn't clear from the original email this happened during the board meeting. Now I get it. On Oct 21, 2015 23:09, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:58 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > I think that's my point. Those

Re: Not just yet (was: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Brooklyn from incubator)

2015-10-22 Thread Ted Dunning
Indeed, if Hadrian had succeeded in editing during the meeting, it would have been fixed right then. Murphy weighed in and we have a 4 week delay. On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:03 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Ah ha. It wasn't clear from the original email this happened

Not just yet (was: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Brooklyn from incubator)

2015-10-21 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
The resolution to graduate Apache Brooklyn out of the incubator was tabled due to a procedural issue. This has nothing to do with the code or the community. The reason was an editorial error on my side, I used the wrong template and the last paragraph releasing the incubator from its

Re: Not just yet (was: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Brooklyn from incubator)

2015-10-21 Thread John D. Ament
Any reason you need 4 weeks to add the paragraph back? On Oct 21, 2015 21:09, "Hadrian Zbarcea" wrote: > The resolution to graduate Apache Brooklyn out of the incubator was tabled > due to a procedural issue. This has nothing to do with the code or the > community. > > The

Re: Not just yet (was: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Brooklyn from incubator)

2015-10-21 Thread Greg Stein
Several things: the description of the project in para 1 and 3 do not match. Second, the wording of the (current) last paragraph doesn't refer to "podling" like other Incubator graduation resolutions. Third, the final paragraph from the template, releasing the Incubator from responsibility. See

Re: Not just yet (was: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Brooklyn from incubator)

2015-10-21 Thread John D. Ament
On Oct 21, 2015 22:48, "Greg Stein" wrote: > > Several things: the description of the project in para 1 and 3 do not > match. Second, the wording of the (current) last paragraph doesn't refer to > "podling" like other Incubator graduation resolutions. Third, the final >

Re: Not just yet (was: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Brooklyn from incubator)

2015-10-21 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:58 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > I think that's my point. Those two weeks should be used to get incubator > approval. If you wait 4 weeks you don't graduate until December. The Incubator isn't going to vote again. The text of the graduation