Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Joe Schaefer
Joe Schaefer >Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 1:23 PM >Subject: Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: >Small but otherwise happy podlings)] > > > > > >On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > >It is good that someone fin

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
he.org > >> Cc: > >> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:01 PM > >> Subject: Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report > (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)] > >> > >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Joe Schaefer >

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
idea needs more details for sure IMHO, but I like the base line of it. > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: Robert Burrell Donkin > > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > > Cc: > > > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:31 AM > > &g

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
not make one general rule and apply on all podlings that we as IPMC see that they are not doing well. I think it is better to check case by case, which I know would not be easy. > > > - Original Message - > > From: Robert Burrell Donkin > > To: general@incubator.apache

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Hi Robert... On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin < robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Stuart Monteith > wrote: > > > > >> I'll back up what Ant said - Robert and Ant have shown heroic

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
You didn't annoy me Benson, I think you're spot on, +1. Cheers, Chris On Jan 15, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I would appreciate it if the participants in this discussion would be > really clear about their views about several different podling > profiles. > > a: A reasonably div

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Benson Margulies
I would appreciate it if the participants in this discussion would be really clear about their views about several different podling profiles. a: A reasonably diverse group of 5-7 people start a podling. A year later, they've made a release or two, but no one new has turned up. Mentors attest to g

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Joe Schaefer
> Subject: Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: > Small but otherwise happy podlings)] > > Relevant difference: when we reject a project we do that on public > lists, when you apply to a university the fact you did so is private. > > Joe Schaefer w

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Daniel Shahaf
munity. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Daniel Shahaf > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:00 PM > > Subject: Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: > > Small but

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Last time I looked, mentors were delegated this duty by the IPMC. > If not, let's go ahead and do that just to add clarity. It's indeed pretty clearly documented already: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Joe Schaefer
Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: > Small but otherwise happy podlings)] > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Joe Schaefer > wrote: >>> From: Robert Burrell Donkin >>> To: general@incubator.apache.org >>> Cc: >>>

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Joe Schaefer
ache.org >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:11 PM >>> Subject: Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report > (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)] >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Joe Schaefer >

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> From: Robert Burrell Donkin >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Cc: >> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:01 PM >> Subject: Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: >>

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
e.org >>>>  Cc: >>>>  Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:01 PM >>>>  Subject: Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report >> (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)] >>>> >>>>  On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Joe Sch

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Joe Schaefer
- Original Message - > From: ant elder > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:12 PM > Subject: Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: > Small but otherwise happy podlings)] > > On Sun, Jan

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Joe Schaefer
- Original Message - > From: Robert Burrell Donkin > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:11 PM > Subject: Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: > Small but otherwise happy podlings)] > > On S

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread ant elder
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > It is good that someone finally explained their opinion of > a mentor's responsibility to the IPMC out in the open.  Let > me disagree with you that mentors are not supposed to be put > in the position of judging whether or not a podling is ac

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > - Original Message - > >> From: Robert Burrell Donkin >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Cc: >> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:01 PM >> Subject: Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this mon

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Joe Schaefer
- Original Message - > From: Robert Burrell Donkin > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 12:01 PM > Subject: Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: > Small but otherwise happy podlings)] > > On S

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Joe Schaefer
t; >> - Original Message - >> > From: Robert Burrell Donkin >> > To: general@incubator.apache.org >> > Cc: >> > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:31 AM >> > Subject: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board re

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Daniel Shahaf
gt; > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:31 AM > > Subject: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: > > Small but otherwise happy podlings)] > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:32

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > It is good that someone finally explained their opinion of > a mentor's responsibility to the IPMC out in the open.  Let > me disagree with you that mentors are not supposed to be put > in the position of judging whether or not a podling is ac

Re: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Joe Schaefer
onkin > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:31 AM > Subject: Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small > but otherwise happy podlings)] > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> On Wed, Ja

Parking Projects [WAS Re: -1 on this months board report (was: Small but otherwise happy podlings)]

2012-01-15 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Stuart Monteith wrote: >> I'll back up what Ant said - Robert and Ant have shown heroic patience as >> mentors on this project. The situation will resolve itself one way or the >> other soon. > > If the ques