Hello all,
Based on some work I've been experimenting with using SBT for Log4j Scala
API, I wrote an Apache Rat interface for SBT [1]. It's pretty minimal for
now (no docs or site, only supports some of the rat options), but it
already does some of what the ant and maven plugins do.
Hi Craig,
just committed some changes to address those concerns:
- issues #1 and #2: added into NOTICE/LICENSE
- #3: that comment is most probably there because it is a minified version,
anyway, I've added the appropiate text in NOTICE
- #4: more or less, the same issue as #3. We contacted the
Hi Juan Pablo,
The license update is looking very good. Thanks for pitching in and
doing all this heavy lifting!
I have some concerns with the files listed below.
1. The SilkIconSet images are licensed under CC-attribution 2.5
license. The NOTICE needs to accommodate the comment from the s
Hi,
comments inline
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> On Oct 8, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
>
> Hello,
>>
>> We've added support to generate RAT files (RAT report for RC3 available at
>> [#1]) and began to
On Oct 8, 2012, at 3:59 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
Hello,
We've added support to generate RAT files (RAT report for RC3
available at
[#1]) and began to play with it, via rat-ant-tasks [#2]. As noted in
previous e-mails, all the JSP files lack of a proper header. So, a
c
Hello,
We've added support to generate RAT files (RAT report for RC3 available at
[#1]) and began to play with it, via rat-ant-tasks [#2]. As noted in
previous e-mails, all the JSP files lack of a proper header. So, a couple
of questions:
- we pass the addLicenseHeaders argument to the r
On 11 June 2012 21:18, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On 06/11/12 15:17, sebb wrote:
>>
>> Do we still need the following external on
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk ?
>>
>> svn:external rat -r679965
>> http://svn.apache.org/repo
On 06/11/12 15:17, sebb wrote:
Do we still need the following external on
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk ?
svn:external rat -r679965
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/trunk/scan/src/main
Those RAT files have not been updated since 2008.
There are
Do we still need the following external on
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk ?
svn:external rat -r679965
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/trunk/scan/src/main
Those RAT files have not been updated since 2008
On 11 June 2012 11:52, sebb wrote:
> On 11 June 2012 04:50, David Crossley wrote:
>> The RAT status page is giving a 404 Not Found
>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/rat.html
>>
>> The source is still there in SVN at content/projects/rat.xml
>> but the gen
On 11 June 2012 04:50, David Crossley wrote:
> The RAT status page is giving a 404 Not Found
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/rat.html
>
> The source is still there in SVN at content/projects/rat.xml
> but the generated html is gone on the server.
>
> Perhaps Robert d
On 6/10/12 8:50 PM, "David Crossley" wrote:
> The RAT status page is giving a 404 Not Found
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/rat.html
>
> The source is still there in SVN at content/projects/rat.xml
> but the generated html is gone on the server.
>
&g
The RAT status page is giving a 404 Not Found
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/rat.html
The source is still there in SVN at content/projects/rat.xml
but the generated html is gone on the server.
Perhaps Robert deleted it by accident when doing graduation tidy up.
Anyway i tried editing that
On 03/11/12 19:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
I will tally the results no earlier than noon UTC on Thursday, March 22,
(Apologies - the convention is 72 hours, and that's what I had mind)
2012[4].
I count
(binding)
+1 Ross Gardler
+1 Marvin Humphrey
+1 Mark Struberg
+1 Ate Douma
+1 Al
/month.
Cheers,
-g
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 15:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> As recommended[1]:
>
> * the Rat community has indicated that its readiness[2] to graduate as the
> Apache Creadur Project
> * the proposed charter has been reviewed[3]
>
> The penultimate stag
Thanks.
+1
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: "Franklin, Matthew B."
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Cc: "rat-...@incubator.apache.org"
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 1:30 PM
> Subject: RE: [VOTE][IPMC] Graduate R
+1 (binding)
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:rdon...@apache.org]
>Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 3:42 PM
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Cc: rat-...@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: [VOTE][IPMC] Graduate RAT as Apache Creadur Project
&
+1 (binding)
On Mar 11, 2012, at 2:42 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> As recommended[1]:
>
> * the Rat community has indicated that its readiness[2] to graduate as the
> Apache Creadur Project
> * the proposed charter has been reviewed[3]
>
> The penultimate stag
tivity that RAT/Creadur has experienced
would be a bit alarming for a typical podling, but I don't see that as
an issue given the exceptionally experienced PMC and the use of RAT by
a lot of other Apache projects.
BR,
Ju
+1
On 2012-03-11 20:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> As recommended[1]:
>
> * the Rat community has indicated that its readiness[2] to graduate as
> the Apache Creadur Project
> * the proposed charter has been reviewed[3]
>
> The penultimate stage is this VOTE by th
On Mar 12, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> ...The penultimate stage is this VOTE by the incubator community. The VOTE is
>> open to all but only IPMC votes are binding...
>
> +1
+1
--
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> ...The penultimate stage is this VOTE by the incubator community. The VOTE is
> open to all but only IPMC votes are binding...
+1
(an easy vote given the all-stars PPMC members list ;-)
-Bertrand
--
+1
...ant
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> As recommended[1]:
>
> * the Rat community has indicated that its readiness[2] to graduate as the
> Apache Creadur Project
> * the proposed charter has been reviewed[3]
>
> The penultimate stag
+1
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
Stefan
On 2012-03-11, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> As recommended[1]:
> * the Rat community has indicated that its readiness[2] to graduate
> as the Apache Creadur Project
> * the proposed charter has been reviewed[3]
> The penultimate stage is this VOTE b
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
>
> [ ] +1 Recommend The Apache Creadur Proposal To The Board (below)
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1 Do not graduate Rat podling
> --
--
On 03/11/2012 08:42 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
-8<---
[ ] +1 Recommend The Apache Creadur Proposal To The Board (below)
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 Do not graduate Rat podl
+1
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Marvin Humphrey
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 9:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE][IPMC] Graduate RAT as Apache Creadur Project
>
>> [ ] +1 Recommend The Apache Creadur Prop
> [ ] +1 Recommend The Apache Creadur Proposal To The Board (below)
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1 Do not graduate Rat podling
+1 (binding)
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.ap
+1 (binding)
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Mar 11, 2012 7:44 PM, "Robert Burrell Donkin" wrote:
> As recommended[1]:
>
> * the Rat community has indicated that its readiness[2] to graduate as
> the Apache Creadur Project
> * the
On 03/11/12 19:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
-8<---
[X] +1 Recommend The Apache Creadur Proposal To The Board (below)
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 Do not graduate Rat podling
--
(
As recommended[1]:
* the Rat community has indicated that its readiness[2] to graduate as
the Apache Creadur Project
* the proposed charter has been reviewed[3]
The penultimate stage is this VOTE by the incubator community. The VOTE
is open to all but only IPMC votes are binding.
I will
My tally of results:
+1
[rat-dev]
Robert Burrell Donkin
Chris A.Mattmann
Craig L.Russell
William A. Rowe Jr.
David Blevins
Hugo Hirsch
Sebb
Gavin McDonald
Stefan Bodewig
David Crossley
Jochen Wiedmann
Matthew B. Franklin
Luciano Resende
Mark Struberg
[general
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> +1 - binding
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Feb 26, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
>> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
>&g
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 26, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
> willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to
> approve graduation. So, here it i
+1
On 02/26/2012 11:03 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates
it's willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the
IPMC to approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
See [2] for a draft of the charter, excl
+1 binding
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Luciano Resende
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: rat-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 7:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] RAT Ready To Graduate As Apache Creadur Top Level Project
>
+1, finally
On 2012-02-26 17:03, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates
> it's willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the
> IPMC to approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
>
> See [2
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
> willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to
> approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
>
> See [2] for a
+1 (binding)
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
> willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC t
+1
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:rdon...@apache.org]
>Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 11:03 AM
>To: rat-...@incubator.apache.org
>Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: [VOTE] RAT Ready To Graduate As Apache Creadur Top Level Project
>
+1 (non binding)
Jacques
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Burrell Donkin"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 5:03 PM
Subject: [VOTE] RAT Ready To Graduate As Apache Creadur Top Level Project
The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstr
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 02/26/2012 10:13 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
+1
2012/2/26 Robert Burrell Donkin:
The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to
approve graduation. So, here
+1
Stefan
On 2012-02-26, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates
> it's willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking
> the IPMC to approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
> See [2] for a dra
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:rdon...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012 2:03 AM
> To: rat-...@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] RAT Ready To Graduate As Apache Creadur Top Level Project
&
+1 (binding)
-David
On Feb 26, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
> willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to
> approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
>
+1
Niall
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
> willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to
> approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
>
> Se
+1
2012/2/26 Robert Burrell Donkin :
> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
> willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to
> approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
>
> See [2] for a draft of the charter, e
On 26 February 2012 16:03, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
> willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to
> approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
>
> See [2] for a
+1 (binding)
Ralph
On Feb 26, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
> willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to
> approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
>
On 2/26/2012 10:03 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> --8<---
> [X] +1 the RAT community feels ready to graduate as Apache Creadur
> ---
+1 (binding and as a mentor)
This is long overdue in my opinion, well done for finally being able
to call the vote.
Ross
On 26 February 2012 21:33, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
> willingness to govern its
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates
it's willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the
IPMC to approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
+1, good luck!
+1 (binding). Great work and really happy about this!
Cheers,
Chris
On Feb 26, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates
> it's willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the
> I
The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates
it's willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the
IPMC to approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
See [2] for a draft of the charter, excluding the list of initial
committers. Unless anyone jumps
Apache Rat is a suitable name for an
product, a good top level project would be more unique name.
After discussions with the wider incubator community, the Rat community aspires
to become a home for a suite of related products developed in any language. The
community prefers to retain Rat as
inform the project about, but the final decision for choosing the name is up to
the project.
If the Apache Rat podling is scurrying hard to keep the name, they should
choose it. If they want something that will ensure only they can eat their
unique cheese, they should consider a more unique na
se's?
What about Apache Ratty, leading to a host of 'Wind in the Willows' humor?
> Establish whether "Apache Rat" is a suitable name
> -
>
> Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1
>
at's an excellent "kill search"! Thanks for doing it so thoroughly.
It sure seems like there are lots of rats out there that could be found by
casual users instead of Apache Rat. Is that the environment that the Apache Rat
project wants to find itself in? Standing out among such
that trademarks are about ensuring relevant users are not confused as to
the origin of the trademarked goods (product, service, etc.). So it's critical
to understand for any of the pre-existing uses or registrations what kind of
software product they are, to consider if users of one organizati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Description: The Rat podling brought together aRat and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Evidence Of Use On World Wide Web:
Searched for &quo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Evidence Of Registration:
Searched for "Rat&quo
CH-1:
---
Evidence of several established open source projects called Rat ranked highly
by search engines.
> Establish whether "Apache Rat" is a suitable name
> -
>
> Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1
&g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Evidence Of Open Source Adoption:
Searched for &quo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Evidence Of Open Source Adoption:
Searched for &quo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Evidence Of Open Source Adoption:
Searched for &quo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Evidence Of Open Source Adoption:
Searched for &quo
Establish whether "Apache Rat" is a suitable name
-
Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1
Project: Podling Suitable Names Search
The Apache RAT team is pleased to announce the Apache RAT Incubating 0.8
release!
Release Audit Tool (RAT) is a tool to improve accuracy and efficiency
when checking releases. It is heuristic in nature: making guesses about
possible problems. It will produce false positives and cannot find every
On 2011-11-12, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> the RAT community has voted to release Apache RAT Incubating 0.8 with
> four +1s by PPMC members, all of whom are IPMC members as well.
With no additional votes from the general list this vote has now passed
and I'll start the publish/wait
Hi all,
the RAT community has voted to release Apache RAT Incubating 0.8 with
four +1s by PPMC members, all of whom are IPMC members as well.
svn tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/tags/apache-rat-0.8RC2/
tarballs:
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/apache-rat-0.8RC2
Hi...
I hope I am not too late, but as they say 'Never too late' :D
+1 for RAT being a TLP
And I also like the Apache Tools umbrella project, but as said that
can be discussed later.
I would also like to help in graduation process if possible :).
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:23
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> +1 for TLP and I could also help out with coding.
Great :-)
Hope to see you on the lists sometime soon...
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.a
+1 for TLD
My reason: > No suitable TLP exists which is build system and
language agnostic.
And I think RAT is an attractive, little project. With time, it will
become very useful to others.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> Rat is (now) one of the
+1 for TLP and I could also help out with coding.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 8/9/11, Pid wrote:
> From: Pid
> Subject: Re: Apache Rat TLP...?
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Tuesday, August 9, 2011, 9:52 AM
> On 05/08/2011 20:46, Robert Burrell
> Donkin wrote:
On 05/08/2011 20:46, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Kalle Korhonen
> wrote:
>> Agree that the scope of Rat alone is limited. You mean if Rat proposed
>> to graduate as Apache Tools (or even Apache Infrastructure Tools)? Rat
>> could st
On Aug 5, 2011, at 10:44 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Rat is (now) one of the oldest podlings, and has an unusually high
proportion of experience Apache contributors. The community and code
are small (perhaps too small) for a top level project (TLP).
Rat tools conceptually run downstream
On 2011-08-05 19:44, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> Rat is (now) one of the oldest podlings, and has an unusually high
> proportion of experience Apache contributors. The community and code
> are small (perhaps too small) for a top level project (TLP).
>
> Rat tools conceptually
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> Agree that the scope of Rat alone is limited. You mean if Rat proposed
> to graduate as Apache Tools (or even Apache Infrastructure Tools)? Rat
> could start as the TLP and later become a sub project once other tools
> gradu
I'm +1 for the TLP case. I was before when we discussed it, and still am.
I'd happily VOTE for RAT to become a TLP. If it needs to change later, then
we can discuss it then.
Cheers,
Chris
On Aug 5, 2011, at 11:15 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:06 PM, K
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> Agree that the scope of Rat alone is limited. You mean if Rat proposed
> to graduate as Apache Tools (or even Apache Infrastructure Tools)? Rat
> could start as the TLP and later become a sub project once other tools
> gradu
Agree that the scope of Rat alone is limited. You mean if Rat proposed
to graduate as Apache Tools (or even Apache Infrastructure Tools)? Rat
could start as the TLP and later become a sub project once other tools
graduate and join Apache Tools as sub projects. Makes sense to me as
there are a lot
Rat is (now) one of the oldest podlings, and has an unusually high
proportion of experience Apache contributors. The community and code
are small (perhaps too small) for a top level project (TLP).
Rat tools conceptually run downstream from the build in the continuous
delivery space, assisting
Thanks - I think it's my crusty memory - the problems I had was
determining precisely what to do with generating
keys, etc., which was just a part of all this.
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Stuart Monteith wrote:
If I am to offer a suggestion, I would suggest
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Stuart Monteith wrote:
> If I am to offer a suggestion, I would suggest that there be a clear release
> process documented in a single location, with the rational for each of its
> steps
> included.
Is this what you'd want?
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/re
what that
process was, and in that respect the RAT tool was a very minor part.
There was
no impression on my part that you just had to run RAT and that was that.
If I am to offer a suggestion, I would suggest that there be a clear
release process
documented in a single location, with the rational
On 17/08/2010 10:45, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-08-17, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Ross, while I understand the "All it does" part I don't get the
"dangerous" part.
It becomes dangerous if people start to believe it did more than scan
for licenses.
More specifically scan for *only* Apache lic
On 17/08/2010 10:15, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Ross, while I understand the "All it does" part I don't get the
"dangerous" part.
There have been a number of people who have stated things like
(paraphrasing) "IP management issues have largely gone away now we have
On 2010-08-17, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Ross, while I understand the "All it does" part I don't get the
> "dangerous" part.
It becomes dangerous if people start to believe it did more than scan
for licenses.
Stefan
-
To unsubsc
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Ross, while I understand the "All it does" part I don't get the
> "dangerous" part.
>
> I think noone has ever announced RAT as a solution. It is a helper
> tool. I think the recommendation t
Ross, while I understand the "All it does" part I don't get the
"dangerous" part.
I think noone has ever announced RAT as a solution. It is a helper
tool. I think the recommendation to use RAT (for what it offers) is
just plainly right. Nothing more - nothing less.
Joch
I'm really worried about the growing meme that RAT is solving the IP management
problem.
It is not a solution, it is merely a tool that is useful for a very specific
use case.
All it does is do a pattern match for an Apache licence header in a bunch of
files. It's really useful fo
I'd be willing to help out with a RAT TLP. We're using it in our normal
build process for OpenJPA, Geronimo and Bean Validation, so helping out
on future votes is the least I can do.
-Donald
On 8/12/10 5:52 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Greg Stein
Hi Niall,
On 8/12/10 2:52 AM, "Niall Pemberton" wrote:
> Clearly then there are small TLPs that operate effectively. However
> any TLP that can't get 3 PMC votes is effectively dead and I don't
> want to see RAT end up in that situation in a year or two. Seeing
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
> chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
>> I feel kind of the opposite -- RAT is an important tool that's required of
>> all the Incub
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:12, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2010-08-11, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>
>>> The real point though is not size - its *activity*.
>>
>> [absolutely correct observation of low activity
Tcl TLP. And Apache Excalibur. And Apache Perl.
>> ... could probably find a few more low-activity TLPs, but I believe
>> you see my point. It isn't about activity either. It is about whether
>> you have eyeballs on the community and the codebase.
>
> Right. And if
eve
> you see my point. It isn't about activity either. It is about whether
> you have eyeballs on the community and the codebase.
Right. And if RAT is thinking about taking the next out of the Incubator
(i.e., graduation there are only 2 options):
* graduate into a TLP
* graduate in
1 - 100 of 320 matches
Mail list logo
