Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-16 Thread Henry Saputra
Yes, thanks updating the proposal. Really appreciate it. - Henry On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Julian Hyde julianh...@gmail.com wrote: The “Relationships with Other Apache Products” section has been updated to cover Optiq’s functional overlaps with existing Apache projects.

RE: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-16 Thread Kasper Sørensen
Good section. I do agree to what it says and somehow hope we can eventually help each other out with e.g. a library of adaptors. -Original Message- From: Julian Hyde [mailto:julianh...@gmail.com] Sent: 8. maj 2014 20:03 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-11 Thread Julian Hyde
The “Relationships with Other Apache Products” section has been updated to cover Optiq’s functional overlaps with existing Apache projects. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OptiqProposal#Relationships_with_Other_Apache_Products Julian On May 2, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Henry Saputra

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-10 Thread Ashutosh Chauhan
Now that discussion is settling down, I will start a vote thread shortly. On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.orgwrote: Thanks everyone for great feedback. With Julian's help I have updated the section Relationships with Other Apache projects so that folks can

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-02 Thread Steven Noels
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014, at 03:21 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote: I would like to propose Optiq as an Apache Incubator project. I have posted the proposal to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OptiqProposal and posted the text of the proposal below. Ashutosh. Given the importance of Optiq for

RE: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-02 Thread Kasper Sørensen
, and differentiate where it makes sense. -Original Message- From: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Roman Shaposhnik Sent: 2. maj 2014 01:49 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-02 Thread Chris Douglas
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: If not part of the initial proposal, then at least making a good case as a criteria for graduation, and writing up related work and how the new project differentiates could be an initial task done on JIRA after

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-02 Thread Andrew Purtell
All that I suggest is that candidate Apache projects articulate how they differ from related projects, and that we consider the strength of this argument when evaluating the long term viability of the effort and community. It would be good if proposals have a related work section done with the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-02 Thread Henry Saputra
HI Ashutosh, Since there was a question/ comment about relationship with Apache MetaModel, I am asking to update the proposal to include this discussion in either Relationships with Other Apache Products or Alignment section before going for a VOTE. Apache Slider did the same thing with relation

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-02 Thread Henry Saputra
Ah sorry, I did not mean asking to update, I meant proposing to update. Thanks, - Henry On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: HI Ashutosh, Since there was a question/ comment about relationship with Apache MetaModel, I am asking to update the proposal

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-02 Thread Chris Douglas
All fair points. However (as your example demonstrates), referring to this duplication as failure instead of evolution biases the incubator to protect existing projects. Putting new projects on the defensive is almost always unfair, unless they're literally forking an existing project. As you

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-02 Thread Andrew Purtell
I realize this is a discussion about Optiq in particular, so please pardon the detour. I won't continue this discussion in this thread further. On the subject of Optiq, I'd be +1 for incubation considering that at least two Apache projects incorporate it substantially, and a third is considering

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-02 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: All that I suggest is that candidate Apache projects articulate how they differ from related projects, and that we consider the strength of this argument when evaluating the long term viability of the effort and

RE: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-01 Thread Kasper Sørensen
I see a lot of conceptual similarity between Optiq and the Apache MetaModel (incubator) project [1]. Maybe something can be done to align the two projects, so that we avoid having two incubating projects that do basically the same thing? Or maybe there's some glaring difference that I am

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-01 Thread Ted Dunning
I think that there is a huge difference between Metamodel and Optiq. In particular: - Optiq provides real SQL including nested queries, correlated sub-queries and so on - Metamodel uses a fluent Java API ... SQL parsing and transformation doesn't appear to be a goal - Optiq provides highly

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-01 Thread Robert Metzger
I agree with Ted. Optiq is a full fledged cost-based query optimization framework for relational workloads. I also want to highlight Optiq's JDBC infrastructure (and ODBC at a later point as well). Rather than implementing the JDBC specification, Optiq users only have to implement a few

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-01 Thread Alan Gates
Apache Hive has recently started work to integrate with Optiq as well. Having it as an Apache project will be good for both Optiq and Apache. Alan. On Apr 30, 2014, at 3:21 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.org wrote: I would like to propose Optiq as an Apache Incubator project. I have

RE: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-01 Thread Kasper Sørensen
[ted.dunn...@gmail.com] Sent: 01 May 2014 09:14 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq I think that there is a huge difference between Metamodel and Optiq. In particular: - Optiq provides real SQL including nested queries, correlated sub-queries and so on - Metamodel

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-01 Thread Henry Saputra
Unfortunately, similar projects entering Apache incubator are common things =( Even though each original project proposers can argue about differences in one way or another, it will eventually decided by adoption and community growth, and at the end the quality of the project itself. Some other

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-01 Thread Andrew Purtell
One could imagine as part of the case for incubation and graduation both an articulation of the project's place in the larger ecosystem, similar to how academic papers customarily place their work and novel findings within the larger field in 'Related Work'. If not part of the initial proposal,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-01 Thread Ted Dunning
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Kasper Sørensen kasper.soren...@humaninference.com wrote: - Can you explain or link to more information about the type inference you mention? The type inferencing is used by Drill. The problem is that strong typing is normally required to parse SQL

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-05-01 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: One could imagine as part of the case for incubation and graduation both an articulation of the project's place in the larger ecosystem, similar to how academic papers customarily place their work and novel findings

Re: [PROPOSAL] Optiq

2014-04-30 Thread Ted Dunning
Optiq has been a key technology underscoring the progress of Drill. It has wide applicability for any project that needs SQL parsing and cost based optimization. Julian has been carrying this torch for a long time, but I really think that having a wider community would help. On Thu, May 1,