On 1/22/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is also good to try to ensure that discussion has settled down, and that
there is a consensus before calling for the vote. I generally believe that
a good ASF vote isn't called to make a decision; it is called to ratify one.
Exactly. A
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Anyone on the PMC want to comment on this proposal?
It seems as if there is significant interest from ASF Members, a willingness
on the part of the donors to adopt The Apache Way, a number of ASF Members
willing to act as Mentors, and no noticeably egregious problems.
Leo Simons wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:39:51PM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Anyone on the PMC want to comment on this proposal?
It seems as if there is significant interest from ASF Members, a willingness
on the part of the donors to adopt The Apache Way, a number of ASF Members
I was actually under the impression [that] the wiki was
the place to leave this sort of thing
During the collaborative phase of the PROPOSAL, the Wiki is used as a common
edit space. When the VOTE comes up, the final propoal MUST be included in
the VOTE e-mail, else that e-mail will be
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I was actually under the impression [that] the wiki was
the place to leave this sort of thing
During the collaborative phase of the PROPOSAL, the Wiki is used as a common
edit space. When the VOTE comes up, the final propoal MUST be included in
the VOTE e-mail, else
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Is this becoming the current de-facto process, posting to a wiki? (or
@)#!)#@ wiki, as I tend to think of them...)
Can we please have things go to the mail list, as that should be the
'primary institutional memory' of the incubator community. Feel free to
also
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:03:14AM +0100, Erik Abele wrote:
[changed subject line though I don't intend to have a big discussion
about this topic]
Grr, I just did exactly the same thing and wrote just about the
same thing. My thread view must be messed up...
In any case, +1 to what he said.
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Can we please have things go to the mail list, as that should be the
'primary institutional memory' of the incubator community.
+1
But let's try to say such things to be educational, not chastising.
Sorry. The wiki made me do it :) I
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Geir (and all),
my name is Jacopo Cappellato, I'm one of the developers of the OFBiz
project and, as you can imagine, I'm very interested in your feedback
about our request to join the ASF Incubator.
About the proposal posted to the Wiki instead of to this
Is this becoming the current de-facto process, posting to a wiki? (or
@)#!)#@ wiki, as I tend to think of them...)
Can we please have things go to the mail list, as that should be the
'primary institutional memory' of the incubator community. Feel free to
also have on a wiki for
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 07:16, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Does anyone else feel this way? Mail archives will live for years in
distributed places. Wiki's seem to be single-sourced and a lot more
ephemeral
Yes. As the primary tool of communication for myself and many others, mails
are
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Is this becoming the current de-facto process, posting to a wiki? (or
@)#!)#@ wiki, as I tend to think of them...)
Can we please have things go to the mail list, as that should be the
'primary institutional memory' of the incubator community. Feel free to
also
[changed subject line though I don't intend to have a big discussion
about this topic]
On 18.01.2006, at 00:16, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Is this becoming the current de-facto process, posting to a wiki?
(or @)#!)#@ wiki, as I tend to think of them...)
Can we please have things go to the
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Can we please have things go to the mail list, as that should be the
'primary institutional memory' of the incubator community.
+1
But let's try to say such things to be educational, not chastising.
--- Noel
Hi Geir (and all),
my name is Jacopo Cappellato, I'm one of the developers of the OFBiz
project and, as you can imagine, I'm very interested in your feedback
about our request to join the ASF Incubator.
About the proposal posted to the Wiki instead of to this list... well if
you go to the
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 10:45:49PM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
David N. Welton wrote:
I guess it should be placed on the wiki? I'll do that later today if no
one else beats me to it.
Here we go:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OFBizProposal
I changed the proposed sponsor to the
On 1/18/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 10:45:49PM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
David N. Welton wrote:
I guess it should be placed on the wiki? I'll do that later today if no
one else beats me to it.
Here we go:
Any other questions or comments on this for now?
I guess it should be placed on the wiki? I'll do that later today if no
one else beats me to it.
Ciao,
--
David N. Welton
- http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/
Linux, Open Source Consulting
- http://www.dedasys.com/
David N. Welton wrote:
I guess it should be placed on the wiki? I'll do that later today if no
one else beats me to it.
Here we go:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OFBizProposal
I changed the proposed sponsor to the Incubator PMC, as that's
apparently the done thing.
Ciao,
--
David N.
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 13 January 2006 04:27, David E. Jones wrote:
As I understand it in order to become a top level project the Board
must be the sponsor, which is why the proposal was written that way.
That is a misconception. For projects targetting top-level, EITHER the
On 1/10/06, David E. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are all looking forward to your comments and desire to express in
advance appreciation for all that you have done and are doing for the
open source world and the software world in general through your
efforts in the Apache Software
J Aaron Farr wrote:
On 1/10/06, David E. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are all looking forward to your comments and desire to express in
advance appreciation for all that you have done and are doing for the
open source world and the software world in general through your
efforts in the
On 1/12/06, David N. Welton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should look at whether this project is a good fit for the ASF
(I think so, or I wouldn't have mentioned the idea to them) rather than
if we are stepping on someone's toes. Geronimo steps on toes. Harmony
does to some degree, as
On Jan 12, 2006, at 11:57 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
This proposal has caught my interest. I'd be willing to help mentor.
That would be great. I've been skimming through the policy emails
that have been on this list for the last few days and it's sounding
like 3 mentors is something that
On Jan 12, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
There IS a conceptual and code-level separation between the OFBiz
framework and components built on top of it, but I think it makes a
nice cohesive project together. It's sort of like if Tomcat and
Struts were under the same umbrella: not
On Friday 13 January 2006 04:27, David E. Jones wrote:
As I understand it in order to become a top level project the Board
must be the sponsor, which is why the proposal was written that way.
That is a misconception. For projects targetting top-level, EITHER the Board
or the Incubator PMC
On Jan 12, 2006, at 6:00 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 13 January 2006 04:27, David E. Jones wrote:
As I understand it in order to become a top level project the Board
must be the sponsor, which is why the proposal was written that way.
That is a misconception. For projects targetting
27 matches
Mail list logo
