Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 2.0.0.rc3

2021-03-22 Thread Juan Pan
Hi team, +1 binding My check list, [x] Download links are valid. [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [x] LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER-WIP files are correct. [x] All files have license headers if necessary. (Expect for files in `3rdparty` dir, the files existing in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 2.0.0.rc3

2021-03-17 Thread Sheng Zha
Thanks for the votes. We appreciate the help from the community. This vote is now only one binding vote short from passing. For the notice dates for TVM, since we haven't updated the TVM dependency in 2021 yet, the version of TVM's notice we included still says 2020. In this case, should we

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 2.0.0.rc3

2021-03-16 Thread David Meikle
Hi +1 (binding) from me: - Incubating in name - DISCLAIMER-WIP exists - LICENSE ok - No unexpected binary files - Signature and checksum ok - Code compiles and tests run NOTICE looked fine except the TVM date, which I think Furkan flagged earlier. Cheers, Dave On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 20:40,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 2.0.0.rc3

2021-03-16 Thread Furkan KAMACI
Hi, +1 from me (binding). I checked: - Incubating in name - DISCLAIMER-WIP exists - LICENSE is fine - NOTICE has incorrect year - No unexpected binary files - Checked PGP signatures - Checked checksums - Code compiles and tests successfully run Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On Tue, Mar 16, 2021

Re:[VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 2.0.0.rc3

2021-03-16 Thread Juan Pan
Hi, +1 non-binding My check list, [x] Download links are valid. [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [x] LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER-WIP files are correct. [x] All files have license headers if necessary. (Expect for files in `3rdparty` dir, the files existing in